16.08.2013 Views

Teacher Learning in a Community of Practice: A Case Study of ...

Teacher Learning in a Community of Practice: A Case Study of ...

Teacher Learning in a Community of Practice: A Case Study of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

1.2.3 Relationship between the TEMS study and the PLESME study<br />

As noted above, <strong>in</strong> the area <strong>of</strong>teacher learn<strong>in</strong>g and teacher learn<strong>in</strong>g communities, Graven<br />

(2002) conducted a significant study entitled: An <strong>in</strong>vestigation <strong>of</strong>mathematics teachers<br />

learn<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> relation to preparationfor curriculum change. The work <strong>of</strong>Graven (2002) is<br />

important to the present study as it embraced the usefulness <strong>of</strong>social practice theory (<strong>in</strong><br />

particular the work <strong>of</strong>Wenger 1998) <strong>in</strong> understand<strong>in</strong>g teacher learn<strong>in</strong>g through<br />

participation <strong>in</strong> a learn<strong>in</strong>g community, an approach common with the present study.<br />

While there are similarities between the present study and the Graven study, the present<br />

study was not a replication <strong>of</strong>the Graven study as both studies have dist<strong>in</strong>ct theoretical<br />

and methodological differences that arise ma<strong>in</strong>ly out <strong>of</strong>their <strong>in</strong>itial conceptions.<br />

In the present study, the research process was <strong>in</strong>formed by the tenets <strong>of</strong>symbolic<br />

<strong>in</strong>teractionist theory. The theoretical framework for analys<strong>in</strong>g the stages <strong>of</strong>development<br />

<strong>of</strong>a community <strong>of</strong>practice as presented by Wenger, McDermott and Snyder (2002) was<br />

adopted, an area <strong>of</strong> analysis that the Graven study did not pursue. This is an important<br />

difference as the present study tracked and analysed the development <strong>of</strong> a community <strong>of</strong><br />

EMS teachers as the community progressed through its various stages. It analysed<br />

different levels <strong>of</strong> membership as theorised by Wenger et al (2002) and drew on the work<br />

<strong>of</strong>Bourdieu (1986) <strong>in</strong> order to analyse the development <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>dividuals with<strong>in</strong> the<br />

community. Ofsignificance is the fact that the EMS community <strong>of</strong>teacher learners was a<br />

naturally occurr<strong>in</strong>g phenomenon that presented itself as an 'opportunity' sample. The<br />

TEMS programme, which became the empirical field for this study was designed with the<br />

<strong>in</strong>tention <strong>of</strong>creat<strong>in</strong>g conditions for eventual learn<strong>in</strong>g community autonomy.<br />

The PLESME 'sample' was a sample that could be viewed as a 'contrived' group<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong><br />

Mathematics teacher volunteers whose schools had been identified by local education<br />

department <strong>of</strong>ficials as schools that could participate <strong>in</strong> the project. These Mathematics<br />

teachers had enrolled formally for an accredited and funded <strong>in</strong>-service programme. Four<br />

teachers <strong>in</strong> the sample had no formal mathematics teacher education. Ofthese teachers,<br />

three had been teach<strong>in</strong>g Mathematics for 20 years, 12 years and 9 years respectively<br />

while the fourth had no Mathematics teach<strong>in</strong>g experience. The rema<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g teachers held<br />

7

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!