16.08.2013 Views

Teacher Learning in a Community of Practice: A Case Study of ...

Teacher Learning in a Community of Practice: A Case Study of ...

Teacher Learning in a Community of Practice: A Case Study of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Here Beth expla<strong>in</strong>ed the difficult circumstances under which she had to teach, cit<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

lack <strong>of</strong> support from teachers with<strong>in</strong> her school for the new curriculum. She described<br />

teachers' resistance to the new curriculum and negative perceptions there<strong>of</strong>. Harley and<br />

Wedek<strong>in</strong>d (2004) posit that teacher support for C200S is uneven and stems from support<br />

for C200S as a 'political project', that is, its ability to deliver equity and redress. They<br />

refer to the anomalous situation <strong>in</strong> which teachers <strong>in</strong>dicate support for C200S, yet do not<br />

have a good understand<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong>it.<br />

It was <strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>g to note that Beth could identify with, and support, the <strong>in</strong>tentions <strong>of</strong><br />

C200S, that is the need to develop 'active' learners. She contrasted this with her own<br />

school experience <strong>in</strong> which she was a 'passive' learner. She could articulate the process<br />

that could unfold for group work but as will be discussed later, her subject matter<br />

knowledge <strong>of</strong>EMS stifled her ability to teach EMS <strong>in</strong> the way she wanted. However,<br />

Beth rema<strong>in</strong>ed guardedly positive about the new curriculum.<br />

<strong>Teacher</strong>s' understand<strong>in</strong>gs and mean<strong>in</strong>gs are closely l<strong>in</strong>ked to their th<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g, attitudes and<br />

perceptions. In terms <strong>of</strong>teachers' th<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g, attitudes and perceptions regard<strong>in</strong>g the new<br />

curriculum, the vignettes <strong>in</strong>dicate that there was a dist<strong>in</strong>ct sense amongst teachers, that<br />

the new curriculum was not work<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> their classrooms and that there were several flaws<br />

that they had identified, such as the overemphasis on practical work at the expense <strong>of</strong><br />

learn<strong>in</strong>g read<strong>in</strong>g and writ<strong>in</strong>g skills. Beth <strong>in</strong> particular was able to embrace one <strong>of</strong>the<br />

design pr<strong>in</strong>ciples <strong>of</strong>the new curriculum, namely, that <strong>of</strong>learner centeredness. While she<br />

could manipulate her teach<strong>in</strong>g to embrace the form (<strong>of</strong> learner centredness), she was<br />

unable to come to terms with the substance <strong>of</strong>this design pr<strong>in</strong>ciple. 2 With the exception<br />

<strong>of</strong>John and Beth, it was clear that teachers had developed negative perceptions <strong>of</strong> the<br />

new curriculum. The discussion that follows reveals how teachers had shifted <strong>in</strong> terms <strong>of</strong><br />

their th<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g, attitudes and perceptions <strong>of</strong>the new curriculum after their <strong>in</strong>volvement <strong>in</strong><br />

theTEMS.<br />

2 Brodie, Lelliot and Davis (2002) refer to this as the tension between form and substance <strong>in</strong> learner centred<br />

practice.<br />

200

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!