Teacher Learning in a Community of Practice: A Case Study of ...
Teacher Learning in a Community of Practice: A Case Study of ... Teacher Learning in a Community of Practice: A Case Study of ...
issues that his pupils were raising in his lesson. He was also able to clearly motivate the reasons for his altered course ofaction in his lesson. An area ofhis teaching, in which John had made a notable shift, was his questioning style. John had begun to vary the type ofquestions he posed to his learners. Questions with different levels ofcomplexity became a feature ofhis lesson. This was evidenced in the lesson transcript and the worksheet that he compiled. The quality ofJohn's worksheet had changed to become more focussed and directed towards achieving the purpose ofthe lesson. The next section provides a summary ofthe key differences between John's teaching practice before his involvement in the TEMS programme and after eight months of participation in the TEMS programme. 181
5.4.3 A summary of the key differences between John's teaching practice before his involvement in the TEMS programme and after eight months of participation in the TEMS programme Table 5.1: Key differences in John's practice Key characteristics of his classroom Key characteristics of his classroom practice before participation in TEMS practice after participation TEMS Poor subject content knowledge Displayed significant subject content knowledge Inability to relate everyday economic Had developed an economics perspective - phenomena to EMS and EMS teaching in a ability to identify and make sense ofeconomics meaningful way in everyday phenomena Lessons built on potentially misleading Lessons developed with an understanding of everyday understandings ofeconomic the concepts ofthe discipline phenomena Tight locus ofcontrol with regard to what and Improved knowledge enabled a more dispersed how learning took place (as a result of 'rein' on how and what was learnt. Ability to insecurity related to inadequate EMS exploit opportunities that arose to enhance knowledge) pupils' understanding ofEMS Inadequate subject content knowledge resulted Improved knowledge facilitated freer and more in stifled interactions with pupils purposeful interchange with pupils Unfamiliar with the nature ofthe discipline and Had begun to engage in a pedagogical its associated pedagogical approach approach that articulated with the nature ofthe discipline Limited meaningful questioning - little or no Significantly improved questioning technique attention paid to levels ofquestions asked and testing higher order thinking skills with seemingly little awareness ofhow these might contribute to learners' conceptual development Inability to probe incorrect responses - Confidence to engage with incorrect responses dismissive - preferred to 'side-step' the - tolerant and supportive - comfortable with unknown uncertainty and confident in his ability to direct responses towards more correct positions Insular approach to content and its boundaries Easily identifies opportunities for integration across learning areas Limited opportunities to engage pupils in Opportunities for reading, writing and speaking reading, writing and speaking leading to conceptual development in EMS Fairly rigid approach to lesson planning and Made critical and valid shifts during the course presentation - lesson proceeded rigidly ofthe lesson, making the most oflearning according to plan opportunities as they arose - had developed a deep enough understanding ofsubject content knowledge to do so. Poor subject matter knowledge resulted in Logical, sequential development ofconcepts - misconception and confusion ofconcepts increasing complexity 182
- Page 145 and 146: completed, final text: rather, they
- Page 147 and 148: the teacher over classroom events (
- Page 149: 'connoisseurship'. I realised that
- Page 152 and 153: In this study, the criteria for the
- Page 154 and 155: In Chapter One I described the sequ
- Page 156 and 157: tactic by indicating to research pa
- Page 158 and 159: On the occasions that I delivered b
- Page 160 and 161: "Confidentiality involves a clear u
- Page 163 and 164: were cordial and professional. The
- Page 165 and 166: CHAPTER FIVE HOW HAD TEACHER LEARNI
- Page 167 and 168: individual participants changed dif
- Page 169 and 170: He received his schooling under the
- Page 171 and 172: school regularly updated the books
- Page 173 and 174: gone on to become really wealthy. I
- Page 175 and 176: John noted that in planning the cur
- Page 177 and 178: Significant changes had thus occurr
- Page 179 and 180: just transfer it. For example, bank
- Page 181 and 182: Extract from the lesson: John: Pupi
- Page 183 and 184: schoolwork as 'economic work'. This
- Page 185 and 186: John: Now we are not looking at thi
- Page 187 and 188: cardboard and drawing or sticking i
- Page 189 and 190: John: Now I want you to remember wh
- Page 191 and 192: John succeeded in drawing on the sp
- Page 193: at her maths books to which the tea
- Page 198 and 199: 5.5 JOHN'S CHANGING PROFESSIONAL ID
- Page 200 and 201: to achieve their joint enterprise o
- Page 202 and 203: 5.6 JOHN'S INCREASED PARTICIPATION
- Page 204 and 205: John regarded the close interaction
- Page 206 and 207: As stated earlier, because the 'con
- Page 209 and 210: CHAPTER SIX USING WENGER'S CONSTRUC
- Page 211: 6.2 SECTION ONE AN ANALYSIS OF TEAC
- Page 214 and 215: understanding it at all. I just don
- Page 216 and 217: In the final interview that took pl
- Page 218 and 219: MM: Shirley: learning outcomes and
- Page 220 and 221: the little things like we started i
- Page 222 and 223: understandings and conceptions ofth
- Page 224 and 225: Extract from Mary's final interview
- Page 227 and 228: Teachers were able to describe the
- Page 229 and 230: The essential differences between D
- Page 231 and 232: Debbie's school, Eden Primary was l
- Page 233 and 234: what he's saying. And in that lesso
- Page 235 and 236: they were excellent, really good. I
- Page 237 and 238: Extract from first lesson observati
- Page 239 and 240: out of the material that they had.
- Page 241: largely recall, repetition or were
- Page 244 and 245: Third extract from Debbie's second
5.4.3 A summary <strong>of</strong> the key differences between John's teach<strong>in</strong>g practice before<br />
his <strong>in</strong>volvement <strong>in</strong> the TEMS programme and after eight months <strong>of</strong><br />
participation <strong>in</strong> the TEMS programme<br />
Table 5.1: Key differences <strong>in</strong> John's practice<br />
Key characteristics <strong>of</strong> his classroom Key characteristics <strong>of</strong> his classroom<br />
practice before participation <strong>in</strong> TEMS practice after participation TEMS<br />
Poor subject content knowledge Displayed significant subject content<br />
knowledge<br />
Inability to relate everyday economic Had developed an economics perspective -<br />
phenomena to EMS and EMS teach<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> a ability to identify and make sense <strong>of</strong>economics<br />
mean<strong>in</strong>gful way <strong>in</strong> everyday phenomena<br />
Lessons built on potentially mislead<strong>in</strong>g Lessons developed with an understand<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong><br />
everyday understand<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>of</strong>economic the concepts <strong>of</strong>the discipl<strong>in</strong>e<br />
phenomena<br />
Tight locus <strong>of</strong>control with regard to what and Improved knowledge enabled a more dispersed<br />
how learn<strong>in</strong>g took place (as a result <strong>of</strong> 're<strong>in</strong>' on how and what was learnt. Ability to<br />
<strong>in</strong>security related to <strong>in</strong>adequate EMS exploit opportunities that arose to enhance<br />
knowledge) pupils' understand<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong>EMS<br />
Inadequate subject content knowledge resulted Improved knowledge facilitated freer and more<br />
<strong>in</strong> stifled <strong>in</strong>teractions with pupils purposeful <strong>in</strong>terchange with pupils<br />
Unfamiliar with the nature <strong>of</strong>the discipl<strong>in</strong>e and Had begun to engage <strong>in</strong> a pedagogical<br />
its associated pedagogical approach approach that articulated with the nature <strong>of</strong>the<br />
discipl<strong>in</strong>e<br />
Limited mean<strong>in</strong>gful question<strong>in</strong>g - little or no Significantly improved question<strong>in</strong>g technique<br />
attention paid to levels <strong>of</strong>questions asked and test<strong>in</strong>g higher order th<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g skills<br />
with seem<strong>in</strong>gly little awareness <strong>of</strong>how these<br />
might contribute to learners' conceptual<br />
development<br />
Inability to probe <strong>in</strong>correct responses - Confidence to engage with <strong>in</strong>correct responses<br />
dismissive - preferred to 'side-step' the - tolerant and supportive - comfortable with<br />
unknown uncerta<strong>in</strong>ty and confident <strong>in</strong> his ability to direct<br />
responses towards more correct positions<br />
Insular approach to content and its boundaries Easily identifies opportunities for <strong>in</strong>tegration<br />
across learn<strong>in</strong>g areas<br />
Limited opportunities to engage pupils <strong>in</strong> Opportunities for read<strong>in</strong>g, writ<strong>in</strong>g and speak<strong>in</strong>g<br />
read<strong>in</strong>g, writ<strong>in</strong>g and speak<strong>in</strong>g lead<strong>in</strong>g to conceptual development <strong>in</strong> EMS<br />
Fairly rigid approach to lesson plann<strong>in</strong>g and Made critical and valid shifts dur<strong>in</strong>g the course<br />
presentation - lesson proceeded rigidly <strong>of</strong>the lesson, mak<strong>in</strong>g the most <strong>of</strong>learn<strong>in</strong>g<br />
accord<strong>in</strong>g to plan opportunities as they arose - had developed a<br />
deep enough understand<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong>subject content<br />
knowledge to do so.<br />
Poor subject matter knowledge resulted <strong>in</strong> Logical, sequential development <strong>of</strong>concepts -<br />
misconception and confusion <strong>of</strong>concepts <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g complexity<br />
182