16.08.2013 Views

Teacher Learning in a Community of Practice: A Case Study of ...

Teacher Learning in a Community of Practice: A Case Study of ...

Teacher Learning in a Community of Practice: A Case Study of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>in</strong>dividual participants changed differed. <strong>Teacher</strong>s' biographies, personal epistemologies<br />

and motivations <strong>in</strong>fluenced the extent to which their learn<strong>in</strong>g 'progressed' <strong>in</strong> terms <strong>of</strong>the<br />

four elements <strong>of</strong>learn<strong>in</strong>g as espoused by Wenger. While some teachers were attracted by<br />

the excitement <strong>of</strong>learn<strong>in</strong>g new commerce content knowledge, others emphasised the<br />

importance <strong>of</strong>develop<strong>in</strong>g pedagogical content knowledge. For some participants, the<br />

social aspect and network<strong>in</strong>g provided by the TEMS project was particularly appeal<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

For others, TEMS provided an opportunity to develop and ref<strong>in</strong>e personal identities, a<br />

means for personal growth and advancement.<br />

This chapter provides a detailed narrative vignette <strong>of</strong>one research participant, a strategy<br />

gleaned from Graven (2002). The reason for the selection <strong>of</strong>one teacher is to provide an<br />

analysis us<strong>in</strong>g a 'thick' description (Geertz 1973) so as to illustrate with richness and<br />

f<strong>in</strong>e-gra<strong>in</strong>ed texture the nature <strong>of</strong>the change that had occurred for this teacher. An<br />

analysis <strong>of</strong>this teacher's learn<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> terms <strong>of</strong>Wenger's (1998) four components <strong>of</strong><br />

learn<strong>in</strong>g is presented. This is summarised and consolidated <strong>in</strong> tabular form and captures<br />

the key difference <strong>in</strong> terms <strong>of</strong>these four components <strong>of</strong>learn<strong>in</strong>g (see Section 5.7, figure<br />

5.2).<br />

Wenger's framework provides a basis for theoriz<strong>in</strong>g the frame for the data analysis that<br />

follows <strong>in</strong> Chapters Six and Seven. Full data sets for all participat<strong>in</strong>g teachers were<br />

compiled. These <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong>itial <strong>in</strong>terviews, lesson observations, records <strong>of</strong>conversations<br />

and <strong>in</strong>teractions with teachers (made <strong>in</strong> myjournal) and data from f<strong>in</strong>al <strong>in</strong>terviews.<br />

Interviews were recorded, transcribed and returned to teachers for verification (see<br />

Chapter 4).<br />

From the data sets, John's data set was selected to demonstrate the nature, extent and<br />

complexity <strong>of</strong>teacher learn<strong>in</strong>g that had occurred dur<strong>in</strong>g the TEMS project. The rationale<br />

for this selection was that John demonstrated the most significant changes with regard to<br />

Wenger's four components <strong>of</strong>leam<strong>in</strong>g. A narrative vignette was constructed from<br />

selective transcripts drawn from <strong>in</strong>terviews, <strong>in</strong>formal conversations, classroom<br />

observations and TEMS workshop observations. In qualitative research, selection is<br />

152

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!