Teacher Learning in a Community of Practice: A Case Study of ...

Teacher Learning in a Community of Practice: A Case Study of ... Teacher Learning in a Community of Practice: A Case Study of ...

pfeiffer.nele60
from pfeiffer.nele60 More from this publisher
16.08.2013 Views

In this study, the criteria for the selection ofthe teachers included their (lack of) EMS teaching experience, their commitment to the teaching ofthis learning area, and their commitment to participation in the TEMS project. After the initial workshop, eleven teachers committed themselves to the TEMS project. It was important for me to earn the trust and respect of teachers and to develop a mutually -satisfying relationship with each one ofthem. Gaining access to teachers' lives and work had to be built on trust and mutual respect. This proved to be crucial when it came to gaining access to teachers' classrooms. 4.5.5 Triangulation The use ofthese multiple data collection methods has merit. Denzin (cited in Mouton 1996: 167) coined the term 'triangulation' to refer to multiple methods ofdata collection which complement each other, thereby balancing out their respective shortcomings. Merriam (1988:69) argues that"... the rationale for this strategy is that the flaws ofone method are often the strength ofanother, and by combining methods, observers can achieve the best ofeach, while overcoming their unique deficiencies". However, Patton (1980:330) asserts that there is "no magic in triangulation", that is, the researcher using different methods should not expect findings generated by different methods to fall into a coherent picture. A similar criticism ofthe romanticism associated with the concept of triangulation is presented by McFee (1992). He argues that while triangulation between methods compares two research solutions to a single problem in an effort to validate outcomes, it is premised on the claim that both methods are investigating the same thing. ". " there is an intimate connection between methods and issues, so one cannot triangulate between methods unless one can be sure that both (or all) ofthe methods address the same issues" (ibid.:217). 4.5.6 Reflexivity 137

Reflexivity is a process in which"... the researcher recognises and glories in the endless cycle ofinteractions and perceptions which characterise relationships with other human beings" (Delamont 2002:8). Educational research takes place in a social context. She argues that the researcher should not "waste time trying to eliminate investigator effects", but should concentrate on understanding those effects. Reflexivity should penneate all aspects ofthe research process. Each researcher should be "constantly self-conscious about her role, her interactions and her theoretical and empirical material as it accumulates. As long as qualitative researchers are reflexive, making all their processes explicit, then issues ofreliability and validity are served" (Delamont 2002:9). 4.6 INTO THE FIELD 4.6.1 Initial access Negotiating access is part ofthe data collection process and should be properly documented. It is often fraught with break-throughs and blockages that shape the research process (Delamont 2002). The real world ofresearch is one ofconstraint and compromise. A researcher has to continually negotiate further access to observe classrooms and interview teachers and students. At a deeper level, access can be seen as a process ofbuilding relationships with people within the organization. The aim is that teachers and students learn to trust the researcher to the point where they are prepared to be open and honest about their perceptions and beliefs. Access is thus never total, but might be seen as an incremental continuum, where the researcher is gradually able to move from initial pennission to enter buildings to a series of developed and trusting relationships with some students and teachers. Access is always provisional as pennission can be withdrawn at any time by principals, teachers, parents, or students (Walford 2001). 138

In this study, the criteria for the selection <strong>of</strong>the teachers <strong>in</strong>cluded their (lack <strong>of</strong>) EMS<br />

teach<strong>in</strong>g experience, their commitment to the teach<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong>this learn<strong>in</strong>g area, and their<br />

commitment to participation <strong>in</strong> the TEMS project.<br />

After the <strong>in</strong>itial workshop, eleven teachers committed themselves to the TEMS project.<br />

It was important for me to earn the trust and respect <strong>of</strong> teachers and to develop a mutually<br />

-satisfy<strong>in</strong>g relationship with each one <strong>of</strong>them. Ga<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g access to teachers' lives and work<br />

had to be built on trust and mutual respect. This proved to be crucial when it came to<br />

ga<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g access to teachers' classrooms.<br />

4.5.5 Triangulation<br />

The use <strong>of</strong>these multiple data collection methods has merit. Denz<strong>in</strong> (cited <strong>in</strong> Mouton<br />

1996: 167) co<strong>in</strong>ed the term 'triangulation' to refer to multiple methods <strong>of</strong>data collection<br />

which complement each other, thereby balanc<strong>in</strong>g out their respective shortcom<strong>in</strong>gs.<br />

Merriam (1988:69) argues that"... the rationale for this strategy is that the flaws <strong>of</strong>one<br />

method are <strong>of</strong>ten the strength <strong>of</strong>another, and by comb<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g methods, observers can<br />

achieve the best <strong>of</strong>each, while overcom<strong>in</strong>g their unique deficiencies". However, Patton<br />

(1980:330) asserts that there is "no magic <strong>in</strong> triangulation", that is, the researcher us<strong>in</strong>g<br />

different methods should not expect f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs generated by different methods to fall <strong>in</strong>to a<br />

coherent picture. A similar criticism <strong>of</strong>the romanticism associated with the concept <strong>of</strong><br />

triangulation is presented by McFee (1992). He argues that while triangulation between<br />

methods compares two research solutions to a s<strong>in</strong>gle problem <strong>in</strong> an effort to validate<br />

outcomes, it is premised on the claim that both methods are <strong>in</strong>vestigat<strong>in</strong>g the same th<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

". " there is an <strong>in</strong>timate connection between methods and issues, so one cannot<br />

triangulate between methods unless one can be sure that both (or all) <strong>of</strong>the methods<br />

address the same issues" (ibid.:217).<br />

4.5.6 Reflexivity<br />

137

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!