Teacher Learning in a Community of Practice: A Case Study of ...

Teacher Learning in a Community of Practice: A Case Study of ... Teacher Learning in a Community of Practice: A Case Study of ...

pfeiffer.nele60
from pfeiffer.nele60 More from this publisher
16.08.2013 Views

4.3 THE COHERENCE OF METHODOLOGY AND THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK In the present study, theory was used in different ways. Wenger's social practice theory oflearning informed the conceptualisation ofthe TEMS project and provided a focus for data collection. The research approach and the data analysis were guided by the tenets of symbolic interactionist ethnography. In terms ofWenger's social practice theory of learning, data collection would have to include teachers' voices and actions as they engaged in the community ofpractice. This necessitated a special kind of relationship with the teachers, one that involved building relationships, establishing trust, developing rapport and credibility, and developing mutual respect in order to gain meaningful and effective access to the data. Data collection would depend on active participation by research participants as well as acute researcher sensitivity to the participants in the study. Wenger's theory articulates well with the tenets ofsymbolic interactionist ethnography, which also advocates, "learning the languag'e ofthe participants, with all its nuances... (and) to show how meanings emerge in interaction" (Woods 1996:41). Symbolic interactionist ethnography has much potential and "can contribute to a sociology oflearning" (ibid.:75). In the process ofdesigning the research study, I had to work out the multiple roles that I would have to take on as the research process unfolded. Graven's (2002) approach to this dilemma was particularly useful and relevant to the current study. One ofthe roles that I adopted was that of 'participant observer' in the TEMS community ofpractice. This entailed my participation that took the form ofme as facilitator ofthe TEMS project embedded in the community ofpractice (providing a professional input). Merriam (1998) notes that adopting this role requires that the observer's activities be well known to all and subordinate to the researcher's role as participant. My ventures into teachers' classrooms saw my role shift to that of 'observer participant'. In this instance, the observer's activities are known to all, but take precedence above participation. The dynamic nature ofthe research and the complex, constantly changing nature ofthe TEMS project influenced the way in which these roles ofobserver participant and participant 117

observer played themselves out. A comprehensive analysis ofmy role is provided in Chapter Seven. Researchers inherently become a part of, and help to shape, the settings in which they study teachers' learning: ...as researchers trying to understand what teachers know and how they learn, we must be particularly attentive to the support and guidance that we provide... (B)ehaviourist perspectives worked hard to avoid this issue... recording what transpired (as if) not influencing it (putman and Borko 2000: 14). Researchers working within the interpretative tradition and holding a situative perspective, recognise that as researchers we are inevitably a part ofthe contexts in which we seek to understand teachers' knowing and learning. This issue is important when individuals take on multiple roles ofresearchers and teachers ofteachers. Putman and Borko note that recent professional development programmes illustrate: ... the bringing together ofteachers and university-based researchers or staffdevelopers into new forms ofdiscourse communities focused on teaching and learning. University participants can bring to these communities the critical and reflective stance and modes ofdiscourse that are important norms within the academic community. In addition, they bring research-based knowledge... that can contribute to the improvement ofteaching. Teachers, in tum, can bring to such discourse communities craft knowledge about pedagogical practices, their own students, and the cultural and instructional contexts of their classrooms (Putman and Borko 2000:9). The next section deals with the various methods that were used in the research study. The fieldwork for this research study took place from October 2002 to February 2004. It entailed periodic interviews, classroom observations, informal discussions, and regular entries in myjournal. 118

observer played themselves out. A comprehensive analysis <strong>of</strong>my role is provided <strong>in</strong><br />

Chapter Seven.<br />

Researchers <strong>in</strong>herently become a part <strong>of</strong>, and help to shape, the sett<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>in</strong> which they<br />

study teachers' learn<strong>in</strong>g:<br />

...as researchers try<strong>in</strong>g to understand what teachers know and how they learn, we must be<br />

particularly attentive to the support and guidance that we provide... (B)ehaviourist<br />

perspectives worked hard to avoid this issue... record<strong>in</strong>g what transpired (as if) not<br />

<strong>in</strong>fluenc<strong>in</strong>g it (putman and Borko 2000: 14).<br />

Researchers work<strong>in</strong>g with<strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>terpretative tradition and hold<strong>in</strong>g a situative<br />

perspective, recognise that as researchers we are <strong>in</strong>evitably a part <strong>of</strong>the contexts <strong>in</strong> which<br />

we seek to understand teachers' know<strong>in</strong>g and learn<strong>in</strong>g. This issue is important when<br />

<strong>in</strong>dividuals take on multiple roles <strong>of</strong>researchers and teachers <strong>of</strong>teachers. Putman and<br />

Borko note that recent pr<strong>of</strong>essional development programmes illustrate:<br />

... the br<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g together <strong>of</strong>teachers and university-based researchers or staffdevelopers<br />

<strong>in</strong>to new forms <strong>of</strong>discourse communities focused on teach<strong>in</strong>g and learn<strong>in</strong>g. University<br />

participants can br<strong>in</strong>g to these communities the critical and reflective stance and modes<br />

<strong>of</strong>discourse that are important norms with<strong>in</strong> the academic community. In addition, they<br />

br<strong>in</strong>g research-based knowledge... that can contribute to the improvement <strong>of</strong>teach<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

<strong>Teacher</strong>s, <strong>in</strong> tum, can br<strong>in</strong>g to such discourse communities craft knowledge about<br />

pedagogical practices, their own students, and the cultural and <strong>in</strong>structional contexts <strong>of</strong><br />

their classrooms (Putman and Borko 2000:9).<br />

The next section deals with the various methods that were used <strong>in</strong> the research study. The<br />

fieldwork for this research study took place from October 2002 to February 2004. It<br />

entailed periodic <strong>in</strong>terviews, classroom observations, <strong>in</strong>formal discussions, and regular<br />

entries <strong>in</strong> myjournal.<br />

118

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!