Teacher Learning in a Community of Practice: A Case Study of ...
Teacher Learning in a Community of Practice: A Case Study of ... Teacher Learning in a Community of Practice: A Case Study of ...
4.3 THE COHERENCE OF METHODOLOGY AND THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK In the present study, theory was used in different ways. Wenger's social practice theory oflearning informed the conceptualisation ofthe TEMS project and provided a focus for data collection. The research approach and the data analysis were guided by the tenets of symbolic interactionist ethnography. In terms ofWenger's social practice theory of learning, data collection would have to include teachers' voices and actions as they engaged in the community ofpractice. This necessitated a special kind of relationship with the teachers, one that involved building relationships, establishing trust, developing rapport and credibility, and developing mutual respect in order to gain meaningful and effective access to the data. Data collection would depend on active participation by research participants as well as acute researcher sensitivity to the participants in the study. Wenger's theory articulates well with the tenets ofsymbolic interactionist ethnography, which also advocates, "learning the languag'e ofthe participants, with all its nuances... (and) to show how meanings emerge in interaction" (Woods 1996:41). Symbolic interactionist ethnography has much potential and "can contribute to a sociology oflearning" (ibid.:75). In the process ofdesigning the research study, I had to work out the multiple roles that I would have to take on as the research process unfolded. Graven's (2002) approach to this dilemma was particularly useful and relevant to the current study. One ofthe roles that I adopted was that of 'participant observer' in the TEMS community ofpractice. This entailed my participation that took the form ofme as facilitator ofthe TEMS project embedded in the community ofpractice (providing a professional input). Merriam (1998) notes that adopting this role requires that the observer's activities be well known to all and subordinate to the researcher's role as participant. My ventures into teachers' classrooms saw my role shift to that of 'observer participant'. In this instance, the observer's activities are known to all, but take precedence above participation. The dynamic nature ofthe research and the complex, constantly changing nature ofthe TEMS project influenced the way in which these roles ofobserver participant and participant 117
observer played themselves out. A comprehensive analysis ofmy role is provided in Chapter Seven. Researchers inherently become a part of, and help to shape, the settings in which they study teachers' learning: ...as researchers trying to understand what teachers know and how they learn, we must be particularly attentive to the support and guidance that we provide... (B)ehaviourist perspectives worked hard to avoid this issue... recording what transpired (as if) not influencing it (putman and Borko 2000: 14). Researchers working within the interpretative tradition and holding a situative perspective, recognise that as researchers we are inevitably a part ofthe contexts in which we seek to understand teachers' knowing and learning. This issue is important when individuals take on multiple roles ofresearchers and teachers ofteachers. Putman and Borko note that recent professional development programmes illustrate: ... the bringing together ofteachers and university-based researchers or staffdevelopers into new forms ofdiscourse communities focused on teaching and learning. University participants can bring to these communities the critical and reflective stance and modes ofdiscourse that are important norms within the academic community. In addition, they bring research-based knowledge... that can contribute to the improvement ofteaching. Teachers, in tum, can bring to such discourse communities craft knowledge about pedagogical practices, their own students, and the cultural and instructional contexts of their classrooms (Putman and Borko 2000:9). The next section deals with the various methods that were used in the research study. The fieldwork for this research study took place from October 2002 to February 2004. It entailed periodic interviews, classroom observations, informal discussions, and regular entries in myjournal. 118
- Page 81 and 82: • Understand and promote the impo
- Page 83 and 84: 2.7 CONCLUSION This chapter began b
- Page 85 and 86: (Walford 2001; Anderson 1999). With
- Page 87 and 88: • It places value on the research
- Page 89 and 90: The main research question in this
- Page 91 and 92: Lave and Wenger emphasise the centr
- Page 93 and 94: 3.3.2 The Work ofWenger (1998): Com
- Page 95 and 96: agree with the way it takes place o
- Page 97 and 98: Figure 3.3: Refined intersection of
- Page 99 and 100: eflecting. The ability of a communi
- Page 101 and 102: object to something that in reality
- Page 103 and 104: practice is not just an aggregate o
- Page 105 and 106: system or institution and the influ
- Page 107 and 108: 3.3.2.4 Learning Practice has to be
- Page 109 and 110: new possibilities for meaning. Brok
- Page 111 and 112: These characteristics indicate that
- Page 113 and 114: engage with one another and acknowl
- Page 115 and 116: A structural model ofa community of
- Page 117 and 118: who were regarded as peripheral. A
- Page 119 and 120: Ideally I would have wanted teacher
- Page 121 and 122: they represent key ingredients in s
- Page 123 and 124: that the Wenger framework presents
- Page 125 and 126: more useful and effective than part
- Page 127 and 128: 3.6 CONCLUSION This chapter provide
- Page 129 and 130: • While my professional input int
- Page 131: • Cycle ofhypothesis and theory b
- Page 135 and 136: organised events and linked communi
- Page 137 and 138: In keeping with ethnographic princi
- Page 139 and 140: In this qualitative study, my inter
- Page 141 and 142: collection. He questions whether co
- Page 143 and 144: physical context, the complex body
- Page 145 and 146: completed, final text: rather, they
- Page 147 and 148: the teacher over classroom events (
- Page 149: 'connoisseurship'. I realised that
- Page 152 and 153: In this study, the criteria for the
- Page 154 and 155: In Chapter One I described the sequ
- Page 156 and 157: tactic by indicating to research pa
- Page 158 and 159: On the occasions that I delivered b
- Page 160 and 161: "Confidentiality involves a clear u
- Page 163 and 164: were cordial and professional. The
- Page 165 and 166: CHAPTER FIVE HOW HAD TEACHER LEARNI
- Page 167 and 168: individual participants changed dif
- Page 169 and 170: He received his schooling under the
- Page 171 and 172: school regularly updated the books
- Page 173 and 174: gone on to become really wealthy. I
- Page 175 and 176: John noted that in planning the cur
- Page 177 and 178: Significant changes had thus occurr
- Page 179 and 180: just transfer it. For example, bank
- Page 181 and 182: Extract from the lesson: John: Pupi
observer played themselves out. A comprehensive analysis <strong>of</strong>my role is provided <strong>in</strong><br />
Chapter Seven.<br />
Researchers <strong>in</strong>herently become a part <strong>of</strong>, and help to shape, the sett<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>in</strong> which they<br />
study teachers' learn<strong>in</strong>g:<br />
...as researchers try<strong>in</strong>g to understand what teachers know and how they learn, we must be<br />
particularly attentive to the support and guidance that we provide... (B)ehaviourist<br />
perspectives worked hard to avoid this issue... record<strong>in</strong>g what transpired (as if) not<br />
<strong>in</strong>fluenc<strong>in</strong>g it (putman and Borko 2000: 14).<br />
Researchers work<strong>in</strong>g with<strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>terpretative tradition and hold<strong>in</strong>g a situative<br />
perspective, recognise that as researchers we are <strong>in</strong>evitably a part <strong>of</strong>the contexts <strong>in</strong> which<br />
we seek to understand teachers' know<strong>in</strong>g and learn<strong>in</strong>g. This issue is important when<br />
<strong>in</strong>dividuals take on multiple roles <strong>of</strong>researchers and teachers <strong>of</strong>teachers. Putman and<br />
Borko note that recent pr<strong>of</strong>essional development programmes illustrate:<br />
... the br<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g together <strong>of</strong>teachers and university-based researchers or staffdevelopers<br />
<strong>in</strong>to new forms <strong>of</strong>discourse communities focused on teach<strong>in</strong>g and learn<strong>in</strong>g. University<br />
participants can br<strong>in</strong>g to these communities the critical and reflective stance and modes<br />
<strong>of</strong>discourse that are important norms with<strong>in</strong> the academic community. In addition, they<br />
br<strong>in</strong>g research-based knowledge... that can contribute to the improvement <strong>of</strong>teach<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
<strong>Teacher</strong>s, <strong>in</strong> tum, can br<strong>in</strong>g to such discourse communities craft knowledge about<br />
pedagogical practices, their own students, and the cultural and <strong>in</strong>structional contexts <strong>of</strong><br />
their classrooms (Putman and Borko 2000:9).<br />
The next section deals with the various methods that were used <strong>in</strong> the research study. The<br />
fieldwork for this research study took place from October 2002 to February 2004. It<br />
entailed periodic <strong>in</strong>terviews, classroom observations, <strong>in</strong>formal discussions, and regular<br />
entries <strong>in</strong> myjournal.<br />
118