Teacher Learning in a Community of Practice: A Case Study of ...

Teacher Learning in a Community of Practice: A Case Study of ... Teacher Learning in a Community of Practice: A Case Study of ...

pfeiffer.nele60
from pfeiffer.nele60 More from this publisher
16.08.2013 Views

The focus ofthe theory is on the components that are necessary to make a community function in the work environment, especially in what they term "the knowledge economy" (Wenger et aI, 2002:6). They argue that communities ofpractice are an effective way ofmanaging knowledge and explain the importance and necessity ofthis management ofknowledge in the modern rapidly changing global economy. Knowledge management needs to become more systematic and deliberate. Knowledge has a collective nature and involves every person contributing a perspective to a problem. A community ofpractice allows for the connection ofisolated pockets ofexpertise across an organisation The concept of 'cultivating' communities ofpractice is used by referring to the analogy ofa plant that does its own growing irrespective ofhow its germination had occurred. Just as it is not possible to pull the components (stem and leaves) ofa plant to make it grow faster, it is also not possible to force a community ofpractice to grow. They note however, that much can be done to encourage the healthy growth ofa community of practice. While some communities ofpractice grow spontaneously, others require careful seeding. It is important to value the learning that takes place in communities ofpractice, by making time and resources available for their work, encouraging participation and removing barriers (Wenger et al 2002). What follows is a list of some ofthe benefits ofcommunities ofpractice to its members as suggested by Wenger et al (more or less verbatim)(Wenger et al 2002: 16). They: Help with challenges Provide a forum for expanding skills and access to expertise Develop abilities to contribute to a team and keeping abreast ofthe field Develop confidence in approach to problems Provide a sense ofbelonging and enhances professional reputations Allow for more meaningful participation Allow for increased marketability and employability Develop a strong sense ofprofessional identity 99

A structural model ofa community ofpractice is proposed. It suggests that a community ofpractice is a combination ofthree fundamental elements, namely, a domain, a community and practice (Wenger et al2002). 3.3.3.1 Domain The concept domain is an extension ofwhat Wenger previously referred to as 'joint enterprise' (Wenger 1998). Domain refers to the core business or set ofissues or common ground that creates the identity ofthe community ofpractice. It is what inspires members to participate and contribute to the community ofpractice by guiding their learning and giving meaning to their actions. Members decide what is worth sharing and which activities to pursue. They become accountable to a body ofknowledge and to the development ofa practice. Members decide what matters. The domain therefore guides the way they organize their knowledge. "What creates ... common ground, the domain of a community is its raison d'etre" (Wenger et al 2002:31). 3.3.3.2 Community Here, Wenger's concept of 'mutual engagement' (Wenger 1998) is presented as the concept 'community'. It is described as creating the 'social fabric oflearning' (Wenger et al2002:28) and refers to regular interactions and valuable relations that are based on mutual respect and trust. Learning is a matter ofbelonging. Communities ofpractice can take on various sizes, but requires a 'critical mass' ofpeople (ibid.). Participation is voluntary. The success of a community ofpractice depends on the energy that the community generates and distributed internal leadership. Recognized experts help legitimise the community's existence but may not necessarily be the one's who bring the community together. Every community develops a unique atmosphere that could either be intense, or laid back, formal or informal and either hierarchical or democratic. The focus however is on collective inquiry (Wenger et al2002). 100

The focus <strong>of</strong>the theory is on the components that are necessary to make a community<br />

function <strong>in</strong> the work environment, especially <strong>in</strong> what they term "the knowledge<br />

economy" (Wenger et aI, 2002:6). They argue that communities <strong>of</strong>practice are an<br />

effective way <strong>of</strong>manag<strong>in</strong>g knowledge and expla<strong>in</strong> the importance and necessity <strong>of</strong>this<br />

management <strong>of</strong>knowledge <strong>in</strong> the modern rapidly chang<strong>in</strong>g global economy. Knowledge<br />

management needs to become more systematic and deliberate. Knowledge has a<br />

collective nature and <strong>in</strong>volves every person contribut<strong>in</strong>g a perspective to a problem. A<br />

community <strong>of</strong>practice allows for the connection <strong>of</strong>isolated pockets <strong>of</strong>expertise across<br />

an organisation<br />

The concept <strong>of</strong> 'cultivat<strong>in</strong>g' communities <strong>of</strong>practice is used by referr<strong>in</strong>g to the analogy<br />

<strong>of</strong>a plant that does its own grow<strong>in</strong>g irrespective <strong>of</strong>how its germ<strong>in</strong>ation had occurred.<br />

Just as it is not possible to pull the components (stem and leaves) <strong>of</strong>a plant to make it<br />

grow faster, it is also not possible to force a community <strong>of</strong>practice to grow. They note<br />

however, that much can be done to encourage the healthy growth <strong>of</strong>a community <strong>of</strong><br />

practice. While some communities <strong>of</strong>practice grow spontaneously, others require careful<br />

seed<strong>in</strong>g. It is important to value the learn<strong>in</strong>g that takes place <strong>in</strong> communities <strong>of</strong>practice,<br />

by mak<strong>in</strong>g time and resources available for their work, encourag<strong>in</strong>g participation and<br />

remov<strong>in</strong>g barriers (Wenger et al 2002).<br />

What follows is a list <strong>of</strong> some <strong>of</strong>the benefits <strong>of</strong>communities <strong>of</strong>practice to its members<br />

as suggested by Wenger et al (more or less verbatim)(Wenger et al 2002: 16).<br />

They:<br />

Help with challenges<br />

Provide a forum for expand<strong>in</strong>g skills and access to expertise<br />

Develop abilities to contribute to a team and keep<strong>in</strong>g abreast <strong>of</strong>the field<br />

Develop confidence <strong>in</strong> approach to problems<br />

Provide a sense <strong>of</strong>belong<strong>in</strong>g and enhances pr<strong>of</strong>essional reputations<br />

Allow for more mean<strong>in</strong>gful participation<br />

Allow for <strong>in</strong>creased marketability and employability<br />

Develop a strong sense <strong>of</strong>pr<strong>of</strong>essional identity<br />

99

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!