16.08.2013 Views

Teacher Learning in a Community of Practice: A Case Study of ...

Teacher Learning in a Community of Practice: A Case Study of ...

Teacher Learning in a Community of Practice: A Case Study of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

possible when experience <strong>of</strong>mean<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>teracts with a 'regime <strong>of</strong>competence'. Both<br />

experience and competence are constituents <strong>of</strong>learn<strong>in</strong>g. They do not however, determ<strong>in</strong>e<br />

each other or they may <strong>in</strong>deed even be out <strong>of</strong>sync with each other.<br />

Competence may drive experience (Wenger 1998). Sometimes a participant has to align<br />

herselfwith a regime <strong>of</strong> competence. For participants to achieve the competence def<strong>in</strong>ed<br />

by a community, they transform their experience until it fits with<strong>in</strong> the regime.<br />

Experience may drive competence. Ifone <strong>of</strong>the participants had an experience that fell<br />

out <strong>of</strong>the regime <strong>of</strong> competence <strong>of</strong> a community, as a way <strong>of</strong>assert<strong>in</strong>g her membership,<br />

she may attempt to change the community's regime <strong>of</strong>competence so that it <strong>in</strong>cludes her<br />

experience. To achieve this she may negotiate its mean<strong>in</strong>g with the community <strong>of</strong><br />

practice, by <strong>in</strong>vit<strong>in</strong>g others to participate <strong>in</strong> her experience and may attempt to reify it for<br />

them. "Ifthey have enough legitimacy, as members to be successful, they will have<br />

changed the regime <strong>of</strong>competence - created new knowledge <strong>in</strong> the process" (ibid.: 138)<br />

Wenger (ibid.: 139) states, "This two-way <strong>in</strong>teraction <strong>of</strong> experience and competence is<br />

crucial to the evolution <strong>of</strong>practice. In it lies the potential for the transformation <strong>of</strong>both<br />

experience and competence, and thus for learn<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dividually and collectively".<br />

3.3.2.8 The concept 'identity' as espoused by Wenger<br />

The issue <strong>of</strong>identity is an <strong>in</strong>tegral part <strong>of</strong>a social theory and as such cannot be separated<br />

from issues <strong>of</strong>practice, community and mean<strong>in</strong>g. A participant, <strong>in</strong> build<strong>in</strong>g an identity,<br />

has to negotiate the mean<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>of</strong>her experience <strong>of</strong>membership <strong>in</strong> social community. In<br />

understand<strong>in</strong>g the concept identity, one should avoid a simplistic <strong>in</strong>dividual-social<br />

dichotomy (Wenger 1998). Us<strong>in</strong>g the concept identity <strong>in</strong> social terms, does not deny<br />

<strong>in</strong>dividuality, but <strong>in</strong>dividuality is seen as someth<strong>in</strong>g that is part <strong>of</strong>the practices <strong>of</strong> specific<br />

communities. The focus should be on how the <strong>in</strong>dividual and the community mutually<br />

constitute their identities. Each act <strong>of</strong>participation and reification reflects the mutual<br />

constitution (<strong>of</strong>identities) between <strong>in</strong>dividuals and collectives. There is a deep<br />

connection between identity and practice. (ibid.). In develop<strong>in</strong>g a practice, members<br />

97

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!