16.08.2013 Views

Teacher Learning in a Community of Practice: A Case Study of ...

Teacher Learning in a Community of Practice: A Case Study of ...

Teacher Learning in a Community of Practice: A Case Study of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Wenger expla<strong>in</strong>s that:<br />

Def<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g a jo<strong>in</strong>t enterprise is a process, not a static agreement. It produces relations <strong>of</strong><br />

accountability that are notjust fixed constra<strong>in</strong>ts or norms. These relations are manifested<br />

not as conformity but as the ability to negotiate actions as accountable to the enterprise<br />

(Wenger 1998:82).<br />

3.3.2.3.3 How is 'shared repertoire' a characteristic <strong>of</strong> practice as a source <strong>of</strong><br />

community coherence?<br />

Over time, the jo<strong>in</strong>t pursuit <strong>of</strong>an enterprise by its participants creates resources for<br />

negotiat<strong>in</strong>g mean<strong>in</strong>g. The elements <strong>of</strong> a shared repertoire <strong>of</strong>a community <strong>of</strong>practice can<br />

be very heterogeneous and could <strong>in</strong>clude "rout<strong>in</strong>es, words, tools, ways <strong>of</strong> do<strong>in</strong>g th<strong>in</strong>gs,<br />

stories, gestures, symbols" that the community has developed over time and which have<br />

become part <strong>of</strong>its practice (Wenger 1998:83). It comb<strong>in</strong>es both reificative and<br />

participative elements and <strong>in</strong>cludes discourse by which members create mean<strong>in</strong>gful<br />

statements about the world. The term 'repertoire' emphasises both the rehearsed character<br />

<strong>of</strong>the shared resources and its availability for further engagement <strong>in</strong> practice. As a<br />

resource for the negotiation <strong>of</strong>mean<strong>in</strong>g, a repertoire <strong>of</strong> a community <strong>of</strong>practice reflects a<br />

history <strong>of</strong>mutual engagement. "Histories <strong>of</strong><strong>in</strong>terpretation create shared po<strong>in</strong>ts <strong>of</strong><br />

reference but do not impose mean<strong>in</strong>g" (ibid.:84).<br />

While communities <strong>of</strong>practice provide a privileged context for the negotiation <strong>of</strong><br />

mean<strong>in</strong>g, Wenger (1998) warns about romanticiz<strong>in</strong>g them. Shared practice does not itself<br />

imply harmony or collaboration, <strong>in</strong> fact a community <strong>of</strong>practice may not necessarily be<br />

an emancipatory force. He cautions<br />

Communities <strong>of</strong>practice are not <strong>in</strong>tr<strong>in</strong>sically beneficial or harmful. They are not privileged<br />

<strong>in</strong> terms <strong>of</strong>positive or negative effects. Yet they are a force to be reckoned with, for better<br />

or for worse. As a locus <strong>of</strong> engagement <strong>in</strong> action, <strong>in</strong>terpersonal relations, shared<br />

knowledge, and negotiations <strong>of</strong> enterprises, such communities hold the keys to real<br />

transformation - the k<strong>in</strong>d that has real effect on people's lives (ibid:.85).<br />

91

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!