16.08.2013 Views

Teacher Learning in a Community of Practice: A Case Study of ...

Teacher Learning in a Community of Practice: A Case Study of ...

Teacher Learning in a Community of Practice: A Case Study of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

practice is not just an aggregate <strong>of</strong>people and is not a synonym for an arbitrary group,<br />

team or network (Wenger 1998).<br />

An essential component <strong>of</strong>any practice is essentially what it takes to cohere to make<br />

mutual engagement possible. Inclusion <strong>in</strong> what matters is a prerequisite for be<strong>in</strong>g<br />

engaged <strong>in</strong> a community's practice. The k<strong>in</strong>d <strong>of</strong>coherence that transforms mutual<br />

engagement <strong>in</strong>to a community <strong>of</strong>practice requires concerted effort. Wenger (1998)<br />

describes the concept 'community ma<strong>in</strong>tenance' as be<strong>in</strong>g an '<strong>in</strong>tr<strong>in</strong>sic part' <strong>of</strong>any<br />

practice. However, because it may be much less visible than the more <strong>in</strong>strumental<br />

aspects <strong>of</strong>that practice, it can be easily undervalued or not recognised (ibid.). Proactive<br />

steps have to be taken to ensure mutual engagement is transformed <strong>in</strong>to a community <strong>of</strong><br />

practice (ibid.).<br />

Mutual engagement <strong>in</strong> a community <strong>of</strong>practice does not entail a homogenous group<strong>in</strong>g;<br />

<strong>in</strong> fact, the mutual engagement <strong>in</strong> a practice is more productive when there is diversity <strong>in</strong><br />

the group<strong>in</strong>g. Not only are members <strong>of</strong>a community <strong>of</strong>practice different, but also<br />

work<strong>in</strong>g together creates differences as well as similarities. In as much as they develop<br />

shared ways <strong>of</strong>do<strong>in</strong>g th<strong>in</strong>gs, members also dist<strong>in</strong>guish themselves or ga<strong>in</strong> a reputation.<br />

Each participant <strong>in</strong> a community <strong>of</strong>practice f<strong>in</strong>ds a unique place and ga<strong>in</strong>s a unique<br />

identity, which is both further <strong>in</strong>tegrated and further def<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> the course <strong>of</strong>engagement<br />

<strong>in</strong> the community <strong>of</strong>practice. ':Homogeneity is neither a requirement for, nor the result<br />

<strong>of</strong>, the development <strong>of</strong> a community <strong>of</strong>practice" (Wenger 1998:76). Mutual engagement<br />

<strong>in</strong>volves not merely the competence <strong>of</strong> an <strong>in</strong>dividual participant but the competence <strong>of</strong>all<br />

participants. Mutual engagement draws on what participants do and what they know as<br />

well as their ability to connect mean<strong>in</strong>gfully to what they do not do and do not know, that<br />

is, the ability to connect mean<strong>in</strong>gfully to the contributions and knowledge <strong>of</strong>others. It is<br />

therefore important to know how to give and receive help. Develop<strong>in</strong>g a shared practice<br />

depends on mutual engagement.<br />

88

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!