Gugrajah_Yuvaan_ Ramesh_2003.pdf
Gugrajah_Yuvaan_ Ramesh_2003.pdf
Gugrajah_Yuvaan_ Ramesh_2003.pdf
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Simulation ofa Load Balancing Routing Protocol Chapter 3<br />
intennediate nodes to respond to route requests prevents the further propagation of<br />
the route request, congestion can result in the network.<br />
0<br />
0 0<br />
0<br />
0<br />
0 0 node<br />
0 • congested node<br />
route<br />
Figure 3-2. Network congestion due to intermediate routes replying to<br />
route requests<br />
3.2.2. Original DLAR Schemes<br />
The authors [GerlaOO] of DLAR originally suggested 3 schemes that could be used.<br />
The three schemes vary in the manner in which the buffers at each intennediate node<br />
are evaluated. The three DLAR schemes operate as follows:<br />
a) DLAR scheme 1: The first scheme adds the routing load of each intennediate<br />
node on the route and selects the route with the least sum of data packets in<br />
the buffers. Iftwo or more routes have the same sum of data packets, then the<br />
shorter route is selected. If the shortest routes are the same length then the<br />
route whose route request arrived first is the route that is selected as the most<br />
appropriate.<br />
b) DLAR scheme 2: The second scheme uses the average number of packets<br />
buffered at each intermediate node. The route with the lowest average<br />
number of buffered packets is selected as the best route to use. The tiebreaker<br />
3-5