16.08.2013 Views

Gugrajah_Yuvaan_ Ramesh_2003.pdf

Gugrajah_Yuvaan_ Ramesh_2003.pdf

Gugrajah_Yuvaan_ Ramesh_2003.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Routing Protocols for Ad Hoc Networks Chapter 2<br />

The imprecise knowledge of the best path to a distance destination is compensated by<br />

the fact the route becomes progressively more accurate as the packet gets closer to<br />

the destination.<br />

FSR is based on Global State Routing (GSR) [Gerla98]. GSR can be considered a<br />

special case of FSR where there is only one fisheye scope level. Although<br />

information is still only exchanged between direct neighbours, the overhead is high<br />

in GSR because the entire topology table is exchanged among neighbours. Unlike<br />

FSR, GSR does not distinguish between nodes based on their relative distance away<br />

from the node in question. FSR was designed to be able to scale to large networks,<br />

but avoid on-demand techniques while keeping overhead low and still provide<br />

adequate routes which become more accurate closer to the destination.<br />

2.2:6.3.<br />

CGSR<br />

Figure 2-9. Fisheye scope in FSR.<br />

• Centre node<br />

-0 I-hop scope<br />

• 2-hop scope<br />

• > 2-hop scope<br />

Cluster-head Gateway Switch Routing (CGSR) [Chiang97] aggregates nodes into<br />

clusters. Each cluster is controlled by a cluster-head and adjacent clusters<br />

communicate via gateway nodes, which are members of two or more clusters. A<br />

node is always within transmission range of the cluster-head of its cluster. The<br />

cluster-head selection process is determined by the Least-Cluster-head Change<br />

2-27

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!