16.08.2013 Views

Gugrajah_Yuvaan_ Ramesh_2003.pdf

Gugrajah_Yuvaan_ Ramesh_2003.pdf

Gugrajah_Yuvaan_ Ramesh_2003.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Conclusion Chapter 6<br />

While the reactive protocols are able to cope better with mobility, there is a greater<br />

delay in providing routes due to the route request procedure that is only initiated<br />

when a route is required. Another disadvantage of reactive routing is that the entire<br />

network needs to be searched before a route is found, which makes the route<br />

discovery procedure very costly. The inclusion of route caches for nodes using<br />

reactive protocols could be useful, but the disadvantage is that stale routes represent<br />

a liability that may degrade performance rather than improve it.<br />

Various modifications have been made to the basic reactive and proactive routing<br />

protocols, which include special adaptations that are unique to ad hoc networking.<br />

By using physical layer properties such as signal quality and spatial properties such<br />

as mobility prediction, routes can be chosen such that they are more reliable, with the<br />

cost of the route request procedure being decreased.<br />

Hybrid varieties of the proactive and reactive routing protocols employ the table­<br />

driven approach locally and the on demand approach globally, thereby attempting to<br />

exploit the advantages of both classifications of routing. The hierarchical routing<br />

protocols attempt to mimic the fixed infrastructure of cellular networks, with the aim<br />

of simplifying medium access control, code assignment, and routing functions.<br />

However selected nodes become overburdened and resources are consumed unfairly<br />

in the network<br />

All the routing protocols have advantages and disadvantages, and the particular<br />

application for the ad hoc network would determine what type of routing protocol to<br />

implement and whether or not higher cost and greater computational complexity can<br />

be justified.<br />

This dissertation proposes a new routing protocol based on DLAR [GerlaOO], which<br />

is a load balancing routing protocol. The new routing protocol, referred to as DLAR<br />

4 is unique because it combines load balancing with signal quality determination,<br />

which allows the routes selected to be of better quality, hence providing higher<br />

throughput. Simulations are used to compare the protocol to the original DLAR<br />

schemes and to another prominent reactive routing protocol, AODV [Perkins99].<br />

6-2

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!