16.08.2013 Views

Gugrajah_Yuvaan_ Ramesh_2003.pdf

Gugrajah_Yuvaan_ Ramesh_2003.pdf

Gugrajah_Yuvaan_ Ramesh_2003.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Adaptation ofthe Fixed Point Approximation to Ad Hoc Networks<br />

Figure 5-4. Network topology used to obtain results<br />

Chapter 5<br />

The average blocking probability for the network for varying mean arrival rates per<br />

node pair is shown in Figure 5-5. The mean arrival rate of calls for each node pair is<br />

identical and the average blocking probability for the network is calculated as<br />

(5-23)<br />

In Figure 5-5 the call activity probability p, labelled as "rho" in the graphs, was<br />

varied to investigate the effect of call activity probability on the blocking probability.<br />

The ratio of the weighting factors, Wratio is 2. As expected, the larger the probability<br />

of activity of a call, the larger the blocking probability for the network, however the<br />

large difference in blocking probability for different p values is worthy of further<br />

consideration. In the analysis of a communications system, when a node is assumed<br />

to be transmitting with a certain probability while engaged in a call, it is important to<br />

able to adequately characterise the value ofp based on experimental data. Due to the<br />

lack of experimental data for ad hoc networks, p =0.45 is used for the results that<br />

follow. Another striking feature of the graph in Figure 5-5 are the oscillations that<br />

occur for a high probability of call activity. The analytical model becomes unstable<br />

5-12

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!