Second National Reconcilation Study EITI Peru - unofficial…

Second National Reconcilation Study EITI Peru - unofficial… Second National Reconcilation Study EITI Peru - unofficial…

16.08.2013 Views

Consultancy for the Second National Reconciliation Study of the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI) in Peru (2008 – 2010) (Continuation) VIII.1.4 Findings of the Reconciliation Study regarding the materiality levels proposed in the Terms of Reference of the Second EITI-Peru National Reconciliation Study Present study shows that the materiality levels proposed in the Terms of Reference with respect to the domestic production value by subsector have been reached, i.e. over 75% in the case of the mining subsector (86.94% in 2008, 84.41% in 2009 and 83.42% in 2010) and over 85% in the case of the hydrocarbon subsector (88.06% in 2008, 89.73 in 2009 and 90.33% in 2010). Furthermore, the participation of all the companies was achieved, which production exceeds 2% participation in the domestic production value in the case of mining and oil subsector and 1% in the case of the gas subsector. VIII.2 Recommendations Even though the reconciliation process was successful since the objectives of the Study were achieved, based on the information provided by public entities and companies, below we indicate some recommendations intended to increase the efficiency of future reconciliation studies within the frame of the EITI Peru Study. VIII.2.1 Recommendations to improve the reconciliation process Item Remark Recommendation Validity Right INGEMMET does not monitor title to the mining claims. This means that some holders may be prospecting and/ or operating claims without informing INGEMMET timely. This hinders the reconciliation Study. General For purposes of consistency of the reconciliation, special forms were created to gather information on each of the items to be reconciled and for each type of participant in the Study (companies and public entities). However, such forms were not used by the public entities in charge of Income Tax, Mining Royalty and Validity Right. Consultancy for the EITI Peru Multi-Sector Permanent Working Committee We recommend implementation by INGEMMET of monitoring controls and information cross-checking with the General Mining Directorate of the Ministry of Energy and Mines regarding title of the mining claims (in case of managing validity right). For consistency of the information required, we recommend that the Working Committee, in future studies, commits public entities to using the tools provided by the reconciler to make reconciling more efficient. 156

Consultancy for the Second National Reconciliation Study of the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI) in Peru (2008 – 2010) (Continuation) VIII.2.2 Recommendations for future reconciliation studies under recommended EITI standards Item Remark Recommendation Communication of the objectives of the Study to the key personnel of the signed up companies. Presentation of amounts paid by companies Information on volumes of Government revenues The information level of the key personnel in the companies participating in the Study remains limited and requires informal awareness-raising processes. Even though the Committee provides sufficient and necessary information to the representatives of the signed-up companies, such information is not adequately disseminated within the companies. At present, and for this Study, the EITI-Peru Working Committee agreed that information regarding payments made by the companies may be presented in disaggregated form, i.e. Showing each amount pertaining to such company, or in aggregate form, i.e. showing a total amount for a group of companies, according to the preference of the companies signed- up to the Study. . Where Government revenues are associated with the amounts of resources extracted, as is the case with royalties, the volumes of resources generating such amounts were not provided. For present Study, only information on amounts collected was provided. Consultancy for the EITI Peru Multi-Sector Permanent Working Committee For future reconciliation studies in Peru, we recommend a better information dissemination and channelling to following key personnel within companies, for them to appropriately provide required information: - Director of Legal or Regulatory Affairs - Financial Director - General Accountant - Head of Taxes For future reconciliation studies in Peru, we recommend that the EITI Working Committee promote a detailed presentation by each company of the payments made for the items under review. We recommend considering not only the amounts assessed but also the volumes of resources generating such amounts in future reconciliation studies, in order to cover the requirements of the EITI initiative in a comprehensive manner. 157

Consultancy for the <strong>Second</strong> <strong>National</strong> Reconciliation <strong>Study</strong> of the Extractive<br />

Industries Transparency Initiative (<strong>EITI</strong>) in <strong>Peru</strong> (2008 – 2010) (Continuation)<br />

VIII.1.4 Findings of the Reconciliation <strong>Study</strong> regarding the materiality levels proposed in the<br />

Terms of Reference of the <strong>Second</strong> <strong>EITI</strong>-<strong>Peru</strong> <strong>National</strong> Reconciliation <strong>Study</strong><br />

Present study shows that the materiality levels proposed in the Terms of Reference with respect to the<br />

domestic production value by subsector have been reached, i.e. over 75% in the case of the mining<br />

subsector (86.94% in 2008, 84.41% in 2009 and 83.42% in 2010) and over 85% in the case of the<br />

hydrocarbon subsector (88.06% in 2008, 89.73 in 2009 and 90.33% in 2010). Furthermore, the<br />

participation of all the companies was achieved, which production exceeds 2% participation in the<br />

domestic production value in the case of mining and oil subsector and 1% in the case of the gas<br />

subsector.<br />

VIII.2 Recommendations<br />

Even though the reconciliation process was successful since the objectives of the <strong>Study</strong> were achieved,<br />

based on the information provided by public entities and companies, below we indicate some<br />

recommendations intended to increase the efficiency of future reconciliation studies within the frame of the<br />

<strong>EITI</strong> <strong>Peru</strong> <strong>Study</strong>.<br />

VIII.2.1 Recommendations to improve the reconciliation process<br />

Item Remark Recommendation<br />

Validity Right INGEMMET does not monitor title to the mining<br />

claims. This means that some holders may be<br />

prospecting and/ or operating claims without<br />

informing INGEMMET timely. This hinders the<br />

reconciliation <strong>Study</strong>.<br />

General For purposes of consistency of the reconciliation,<br />

special forms were created to gather information on<br />

each of the items to be reconciled and for each type<br />

of participant in the <strong>Study</strong> (companies and public<br />

entities). However, such forms were not used by the<br />

public entities in charge of Income Tax, Mining<br />

Royalty and Validity Right.<br />

Consultancy for the <strong>EITI</strong> <strong>Peru</strong> Multi-Sector Permanent Working Committee<br />

We recommend implementation by<br />

INGEMMET of monitoring controls and<br />

information cross-checking with the<br />

General Mining Directorate of the<br />

Ministry of Energy and Mines regarding<br />

title of the mining claims (in case of<br />

managing validity right).<br />

For consistency of the information<br />

required, we recommend that the<br />

Working Committee, in future studies,<br />

commits public entities to using the<br />

tools provided by the reconciler to make<br />

reconciling more efficient.<br />

156

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!