Second National Reconcilation Study EITI Peru - unofficial…
Second National Reconcilation Study EITI Peru - unofficial…
Second National Reconcilation Study EITI Peru - unofficial…
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Consultoría para la Elaboración del Segundo Estudio Nacional de<br />
Conciliación de la Iniciativa de Transparencia para las Industrias<br />
Extractivas (ITIE) en el Perú (2008 – 2010) (continuación)<br />
Conclusions of the Reconciliation <strong>Study</strong> regarding revenues collected by State institutions and the sums<br />
distributed at central, regional and local level<br />
Official information on the distribution of the mining, oil and gas canon, oil sobrecanon (royalty surtax) and mining<br />
royalties is prepared by State institutions in aggregated form and without a breakdown of the amounts for<br />
distribution in terms of payment by contributing company. Furthermore, the 51 companies signed up to the <strong>Study</strong><br />
do not represent 100% of national production of extracted resources. Given these two facts, the figures for<br />
distribution by company were recalculated. It was considered reasonable that the results of the aforesaid<br />
recalculations should be less than or equal to, depending on the case, the official figures reported by the<br />
respective public institutions, PCM and INGEMMET.<br />
This recalculation yielded the following results: in the case of the mining canon, mining royalties, oil canon and<br />
sobrecanon, and gas canon, the recalculations were less than, or equal to, the figures reported by the PCM,<br />
consistent with the methodology explained in the paragraph above.<br />
Additionally, with regard to the Reconciliation of the validity rights collected by INGEMMET and the totals<br />
distributed by the aforesaid institution at central, regional and local level, it was established that the sum<br />
distributed by INGEMMET, in the majority of cases, represents 75% of the sums collected, as stipulated in its<br />
regulations. The distribution did not need to be recalculated as INGEMMET presented the data in question in<br />
terms of the companies signed up to the <strong>Study</strong>.<br />
Conclusions of the Reconciliation <strong>Study</strong> regarding the participation of the companies signed up to the<br />
<strong>Study</strong><br />
This <strong>Second</strong> Reconciliation <strong>Study</strong> achieved participation by 51 companies in the <strong>Peru</strong>vian extractive industry<br />
sector: 18 companies from the hydrocarbons subsector and 33 companies from the mining sector. This<br />
represents an increase of 54.5% in comparison with the First <strong>Study</strong> conducted in 2009.<br />
Conclusions of the Reconciliation <strong>Study</strong> regarding the levels of materiality established in the Terms of<br />
Reference of the <strong>Second</strong> <strong>National</strong> Reconciliation <strong>Study</strong> of <strong>EITI</strong> <strong>Peru</strong><br />
In the current <strong>Study</strong>, it can be observed that the materiality thresholds have been reached in terms of national<br />
production volumes by subsector, as established in the Terms of Reference. Specifically, this means greater than<br />
75% in the case of the mining subsector: 86.94% in 2008, 84.41% in 2009, and 83.42% in 2010. In the case of<br />
the hydrocarbons sector, the figures are: 88.06% in 2008, 89.73% in 2009, and 90.33% in 2010. Similarly, the<br />
participation was gained of all companies with a production rate exceeding 2% of national production volumes in<br />
the case of the mining and oil subsectors, and 1% in the case of the gas subsector.<br />
Consultoría para la Comisión Multisectorial Permanente de la ITIE Perú<br />
13