16.08.2013 Views

Quantifying Uncontrolled Landfill Gas Emissions from Two Florida ...

Quantifying Uncontrolled Landfill Gas Emissions from Two Florida ...

Quantifying Uncontrolled Landfill Gas Emissions from Two Florida ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Executive Summary<br />

Waste decomposition in a municipal landfill is a biological process which occurs over multiple<br />

decades <strong>from</strong> initial waste placement. Use of leachate recirculation is getting more widespread<br />

use in the U.S. because it results in accelerating waste decomposition and extending landfill air<br />

space (allowing more waste to be deposited in the landfill). Differences in how leachate and<br />

other liquids are added and how the site is designed and managed will lead to differences in the<br />

quantity of landfill gas that is not collected and controlled. Some landfills are designed and<br />

operated to minimize fugitive loss such as the landfill site in Yolo County, California where<br />

liquid is not added until synthetic liners are in place surrounding the waste mass including the<br />

top of the cell (http://www.yolocounty.org/). Other sites are operated to add liquid as soon as<br />

waste is placed in the landfill at the working face (U.S. EPA, 2005a). With this type of<br />

operation, there is no ability to collect and control fugitive loss.<br />

There are limited data on which to base the performance of wet landfills to traditional landfill<br />

operation (i.e., not leachate recirculation). The most extensive work to date was released in 2005<br />

and evaluated gas extraction data <strong>from</strong> twenty-nine wet landfill sites (U.S. EPA, 2005b; Faour et<br />

al., 2007). The data were used to develop inputs for gas generation using a first-order<br />

decomposition rate equation. For a few sites there were longer term data to evaluate trends over<br />

time. However, most of the data were <strong>from</strong> a single sampling event (only one point in time).<br />

None of the sites provided data on potential fugitive loss such as delays in gas collection <strong>from</strong><br />

waste placement or leaks in the surface cover or landfill gas header pipes and extraction wells.<br />

The purpose of this study is to evaluate fugitive loss <strong>from</strong> two different municipal landfills which<br />

were reported to be operating as a wet or bioreactor landfill and have an area regarded as a<br />

“control” cell (where no additional liquid was added). Fugitive methane emissions were<br />

measured at both sites for the “wet” and “control” cells using optical remote sensing (ORS)<br />

technology. <strong>Two</strong> different instruments were used - an open-path tunable diode laser (OP­<br />

TDLAS) instrument by Boreal, Inc (the <strong>Gas</strong>-Finder 2.0) and an open-path Fourier transform<br />

infrared (OP-FTIR) instrument by IMACC, Inc. The measurements were conducted using<br />

vertical radial plume mapping (VRPM) to calculate net methane-flux emission values <strong>from</strong> the<br />

top and side slopes of each landfill cell. In addition to the ORS measurements, SUMMA canister<br />

samples were collected <strong>from</strong> the gas header pipes at the sites to obtain data on trace constituents<br />

in landfills gas including non-methane organic compounds (NMOC), hydrogen sulfide, mercury,<br />

and other hazardous air pollutants (HAPs).<br />

Problems were encountered during the field test. An intercomparison study was planned to<br />

ensure no bias in measurements when using two different ORS instruments (i.e., OP-FTIR and<br />

TDL). A regression analysis indicated that the TDL-AS instrument indicating a potential 40%<br />

bias. However, the very limited number of measurements (n = 7) and the poor regression<br />

coefficient (r 2 = 0.20), raise questions as to the validity of the intercomparison results. Previous<br />

xiii

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!