The Psychology of Safety with regards to Confined Space Entry

The Psychology of Safety with regards to Confined Space Entry The Psychology of Safety with regards to Confined Space Entry

<strong>The</strong> <strong>Psychology</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Safety</strong> <strong>with</strong><br />

<strong>regards</strong> <strong>to</strong> <strong>Confined</strong> <strong>Space</strong> <strong>Entry</strong><br />

Chris Goulart MS, CSP, ARM, CDT<br />

Direc<strong>to</strong>r <strong>of</strong> Consulting Services


This Session Will<br />

Seek <strong>to</strong> explore the concept <strong>of</strong> Human Risk Taking<br />

Provide an overview <strong>of</strong> the psychology <strong>of</strong> safety<br />

Describe why employees work unsafely and enter<br />

confined spaces improperly<br />

Discuss strategies and methods <strong>to</strong> enhance<br />

workplace safety in the most effective manner<br />

possible


This session will NOT<br />

Discuss discipline as a viable option<br />

Quote numbers, statistics, or specific<br />

exposures<br />

Provide any advice about the technical<br />

aspects <strong>of</strong> Grain Bin <strong>Entry</strong><br />

Cover actions during CSE rescues and<br />

retrievals


Your organization has policies and<br />

procedures regarding CSE???<br />

Generally, plans and policies are well<br />

written<br />

Often they are canned or out <strong>of</strong> the box<br />

Sometimes specific <strong>to</strong> the company or even<br />

<strong>to</strong> the particular confined space<br />

SO WHY ARE THESE POLICIES OFTEN NOT<br />

FOLLOWED?


HUMAN RISK TAKING<br />

Discipline is generally ineffective at<br />

preventing <strong>Confined</strong> <strong>Space</strong> <strong>Entry</strong> (CSE)<br />

incidents, injuries, and fatalities?<br />

WHY???<br />

• People don’t want <strong>to</strong> get hurt<br />

• A huge percentage <strong>of</strong> events involve<br />

rescue situations<br />

• It is an absolute guarantee that NO ONE<br />

thinks “it” will happen <strong>to</strong> them


Why do people put themselves at risk?<br />

It’s all about the consequences (more about<br />

that later)<br />

A belief that when bad things happen <strong>to</strong><br />

others it is somehow their fault and a<br />

converse belief that when bad things<br />

happen <strong>to</strong> us, it is just bad luck<br />

A sincere desire <strong>to</strong> help out <strong>with</strong>out serious<br />

consideration <strong>of</strong> the risks


Why do people REALLY put themselves<br />

at risk???<br />

Job pressure<br />

<strong>Safety</strong> requires effort<br />

It has never happened before<br />

A lack <strong>of</strong> a solid “<strong>Safety</strong> Culture”<br />

Peer pressure<br />

A desire <strong>to</strong> assist a distressed employee


THE PSYCHOLOGY OF SAFETY<br />

What are the two most fundamental<br />

concepts when it comes <strong>to</strong> motivating<br />

employees safety???<br />

I.e.… why do employees work safely?<br />

What do they have in common?


When we attempt <strong>to</strong> motivate persons<br />

Does motivation through avoidance really<br />

work?<br />

Do you work harder trying <strong>to</strong> achieve<br />

something or trying <strong>to</strong> avoid something?<br />

Scale and scope is important, but is known<br />

NOT <strong>to</strong> be the most important<br />

consideration, especially relating <strong>to</strong><br />

discretionary effort…


Typically focused on the person<br />

Motivation by avoidance<br />

Based on rules and regulations<br />

Failure oriented<br />

Management owned and driven<br />

Traditional <strong>Safety</strong><br />

People work safely because they have<br />

<strong>to</strong>…


Somewhat like a Merry‐go‐Round<br />

And there’s<br />

nothing wrong<br />

<strong>with</strong> traditional<br />

safety… if you<br />

are happy <strong>with</strong><br />

the ride…<br />

Traditional <strong>Safety</strong>


<strong>The</strong> Punishment Trap<br />

•Punishment is Easy<br />

•Punishment Gets Immediate Results<br />

•Punishment Becomes an<br />

Organizational Value<br />

•Punishment Becomes a Reinforcer<br />

for the Person Applying It<br />

Punishment gets only avoidance behavior.<br />

Punishment does not reinforce anything.<br />

Causing bad behavior <strong>to</strong> go away doesn’t<br />

mean that it will be replaced by the behavior<br />

you want


WHY DO EMPLOYEES<br />

WORK UNSAFELY?<br />

Its all about the expected results <strong>of</strong> the<br />

behavior<br />

Always keep in mind that decisions are<br />

motivated by a desire <strong>to</strong> achieve<br />

something, not avoid something


<strong>The</strong> ABCs <strong>of</strong> Human<br />

Behavior<br />

A<br />

B<br />

C<br />

Antecedent<br />

Behavior<br />

Consequence


ANTECEDENTS<br />

Occur before behavior<br />

Communicate<br />

expectations<br />

Provide instructions<br />

Cue behavior


Antecedents in the workplace<br />

not a strong influence behavior ~ 20%<br />

have short term effects<br />

work best when paired <strong>with</strong> consequences<br />

are overused (ex: train and re-train)


Some examples <strong>of</strong> antecedents


BEHAVIOR<br />

Undesirable Behavior<br />

• job behavior which does not meet expectations<br />

and requirements<br />

• fail <strong>to</strong> comply <strong>with</strong> all safety rules<br />

Desirable Behavior<br />

• job behavior which meets expectations and<br />

requirements<br />

• complies <strong>with</strong> all safety rules all <strong>of</strong> the time


Consequences


CONSEQUENCES<br />

Are either Positive or<br />

Negative for the<br />

behaviors<br />

Predict the<br />

probability <strong>of</strong> future<br />

behavior<br />

Occur after the<br />

behavior<br />

Are <strong>to</strong>o powerful <strong>to</strong><br />

be left <strong>to</strong> chance<br />

Not used <strong>of</strong>ten<br />

enough


Learned His<strong>to</strong>ry = Habit =<br />

Behavior<br />

Antecedent Behavior Consequence<br />

A B C<br />

Learned His<strong>to</strong>ry<br />

(Habit)


What is a Habit…<br />

How does it work for us in<br />

<strong>Safety</strong>?<br />

How does it work against us?


A word about Training Vs Behavior


Why does the workplace allow unsafe<br />

confined space entry?<br />

Workplace Culture<br />

A sense <strong>of</strong> production over safety<br />

Each workplace is perfectly designed <strong>to</strong> get the<br />

results it is currently getting<br />

A belief that unsafe acts are the “fault” <strong>of</strong> the<br />

individual (lack <strong>of</strong> a systems perspective)


WHAT IS THE BEST METHOD TO<br />

IMPROVE CONFINED SPACE ENTRY?<br />

Understand the results from employee<br />

actions and CHANGE the consequences!!!<br />

Move from a traditional safety culture <strong>of</strong><br />

punishment <strong>to</strong> one <strong>of</strong> positive<br />

reinforcement and accomplishment<br />

Always create situations where employees<br />

are more likely <strong>to</strong> succeed doing CSE the<br />

right way rather than <strong>to</strong> do it unsafely


Some Options for Improving CSE<br />

Evaluate safety culture <strong>to</strong> see what the<br />

perceptions <strong>of</strong> the workforce are… (This is a<br />

KEY leading indica<strong>to</strong>r)<br />

Establish a FORMAL Behavioral <strong>Safety</strong><br />

Process<br />

Create a Risk Assessment Group that is fully<br />

Cross‐Functional


Remember….<br />

<strong>The</strong> system <strong>of</strong> your workplace is perfectly<br />

designed <strong>to</strong> get the results you are<br />

currently getting<br />

If you want different results, do something<br />

different

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!