16.08.2013 Views

Application of Behavior Change Theory to the Development

Application of Behavior Change Theory to the Development

Application of Behavior Change Theory to the Development

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

viii<br />

BEHAVIOR CHANGE THEORY<br />

enhance <strong>the</strong> contents <strong>of</strong> warning letters. Li (1980) recommended <strong>the</strong> inclusion <strong>of</strong> a<br />

statement reinforcing <strong>the</strong> importance <strong>of</strong> personal responsibility, and also noted <strong>the</strong> need<br />

<strong>to</strong> raise <strong>the</strong> consciousness <strong>of</strong> negligent drivers. Carpenter and Peck (1980) <strong>of</strong>fered<br />

choice in <strong>the</strong>ir probation by mail study. Ayers (1980) concurred with <strong>the</strong> need <strong>to</strong><br />

express empathy as a means <strong>to</strong> motivate <strong>the</strong> drivers <strong>to</strong> accept <strong>the</strong> message contained in<br />

<strong>the</strong> warning letter. Kaestner et al. (1965) thought it was important <strong>to</strong> make an attempt<br />

<strong>to</strong> streng<strong>the</strong>n <strong>the</strong> driver’s sense <strong>of</strong> self-efficacy. Epperson and Harano (1975)<br />

recognized <strong>the</strong> necessity <strong>of</strong> providing information regarding <strong>the</strong> nature and risk <strong>of</strong><br />

unsafe driving behaviors. And, Campbell (1959) recommended <strong>the</strong> use <strong>of</strong> contingency<br />

management.<br />

Warning letters are not new; Michigan, for instance, has been issuing <strong>the</strong>m since 1940<br />

(Hayes, 1969). What has been missing is a <strong>the</strong>ory or model <strong>of</strong> behavior change that<br />

incorporates <strong>the</strong> observations <strong>of</strong> past traffic safety pr<strong>of</strong>essionals with current<br />

knowledge generated from studies conducted within <strong>the</strong> field <strong>of</strong> transformational<br />

psychology.<br />

The Trans<strong>the</strong>oretical Model <strong>of</strong> change (Prochaska and DiClemente, 1982, 1984) satisfies<br />

<strong>the</strong>se requirements and, in addition, provides results from a research agenda that has<br />

steadfastly evaluated <strong>the</strong> effectiveness <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>ory’s elements. Over <strong>the</strong> past halfcentury,<br />

traffic safety researchers independently identified 11 <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> 16 General, Early,<br />

and Late Stage strategies as important components <strong>to</strong> be included in advisory letters.<br />

These 16 TTM elements provided a standard basis for evaluating <strong>the</strong> quality <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

warning letters reviewed for this report.<br />

The TTM is a <strong>the</strong>ory <strong>of</strong> change that incorporates most <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> recommendations that<br />

traffic safety researchers have been recommending over a period <strong>of</strong> 50 years. While <strong>the</strong><br />

TTM was developed independent <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> traffic safety field, it addresses issues that are<br />

common <strong>to</strong> traffic safety. In addition, it has been used extensively and has been<br />

successfully validated with recalcitrant populations <strong>to</strong> address problems once thought<br />

<strong>to</strong> be immutable, such as alcohol and drug abuse.<br />

The results <strong>of</strong> this literature review suggest that <strong>the</strong> Trans<strong>the</strong>oretical Model <strong>of</strong> behavior<br />

change can be creatively used <strong>to</strong> guide <strong>the</strong> development <strong>of</strong> improved negligent opera<strong>to</strong>r<br />

letter treatments that will be cost-effective, and that will improve traffic safety. The<br />

following recommendations are <strong>of</strong>fered.<br />

1. A negligent opera<strong>to</strong>r treatment and evaluation system, with an enhanced<br />

component designed <strong>to</strong> conduct ongoing research in<strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> effective elements <strong>of</strong><br />

treatment letters, should be reinstituted <strong>to</strong> provide regular program and cost<br />

effectiveness data <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> Department’s decision makers. The enhanced component<br />

should be guided both by <strong>the</strong> TTM and <strong>the</strong> research results emanating from that<br />

model.<br />

2. A no-contact control condition should be approved so that true experimental<br />

research can be conducted. Smaller control groups and/or allowing one additional<br />

point <strong>to</strong> accumulate before drivers are removed from <strong>the</strong> no-contact condition<br />

should be considered as means <strong>to</strong> address <strong>the</strong> concerns <strong>of</strong> management.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!