DESIGN OF A CUSTOM ASIC INCORPORATING CAN™ AND 1 ...
DESIGN OF A CUSTOM ASIC INCORPORATING CAN™ AND 1 ... DESIGN OF A CUSTOM ASIC INCORPORATING CAN™ AND 1 ...
Often to describe measurements that are critical to 1 – Wire® network performance, two simple terms are used: radius and weight. The radius of a network is the wire distance from the 1 – Wire® Master to the most distant slave and is measured in meters. The weight of a network is the total amount of connected wire in the network, and it too is measured in meters. In general, the weight of the network limits the rise time on the cable, while the radius establishes the timing of the slowest signal reflections [4]. 2.5.1 Slave Device Weight The weight that can be supported in a 1 – Wire® network is limited and depends on the driver (1 – Wire® Master interface). In simple terms, the weight can consist of many slaves on very little cable, or very few slaves on a lot of cable. Slave devices add equivalent weight to a network. Each device adds weight similar to that of a small length of wire, so devices can be rated in terms of their equivalent wire weight. Consequently, when a network is designed, the weight of the devices is an important consideration. A slave in iButton form usually contributes more weight than a slave packaged as a soldered-in component. iButtons add a weight of approximately 1m, and non-iButton slaves add a weight of approximately 0.5m [4]. In addition to the weight added by the slave devices, circuit-board traces, connectors and ESD protection devices also contribute to the weight of a 1 – Wire® network. Although weight is influenced by many factors, capacitance is clearly the largest single contributor. As a general rule, the weight contribution of ESD circuits and PC-board traces can be related to their capacitance by a factor of approximately 24pF/m [4]. 35
2.5.2 1 – Wire® Network Topologies Although there are countless configurations of 1 – Wire® networks, they usually fit into a few general categories including linear, stubbed, and star topologies. 1 – Wire® network topologies are based on the distribution of the 1 – Wire® slaves and the organization of the interconnecting wires. Linear topology: The 1 – Wire® bus is a single pair, starting from the master and extending to the farthest slave device. Other slaves are attached to the 1 – Wire® bus with (
- Page 9 and 10: SI Serial In SO Serial Out SOF Star
- Page 11 and 12: ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to ex
- Page 13 and 14: 2.4 Types of Devices...............
- Page 15 and 16: 4.3.5 Communication Speed Different
- Page 17 and 18: 5.3.21.1 Synchronization Test (test
- Page 19 and 20: 5.3 Resource Utilization...........
- Page 21 and 22: LIST OF FIGURES 2.1 1 - Wire® Netw
- Page 23 and 24: 4.12 Read-Data Time Slot...........
- Page 25 and 26: 6.4 DS1996 Address Registers ......
- Page 27 and 28: manufacturing process. Structured o
- Page 29 and 30: describes the 1 - Wire® and CAN co
- Page 31 and 32: 2.2 1 - Wire® Overview The basis o
- Page 33 and 34: All 1 - Wire® masters described in
- Page 35 and 36: attachments, microcontroller with b
- Page 37 and 38: Figure 2.3 Bidirectional port pin w
- Page 39 and 40: 2.3.3 Synthesizable 1 - Wire® Bus
- Page 41 and 42: Figure 2.7 UART/RS232 Serial Port I
- Page 43 and 44: hardware. Through control registers
- Page 45 and 46: Table 2.2 1 - Wire® Bus Operations
- Page 47 and 48: 2.3.6 1 - Wire® Search Algorithm F
- Page 49 and 50: detected. This ‘read two bits’
- Page 51 and 52: in Figure 2.15. Alternatively, the
- Page 53 and 54: of the bit, then write the desired
- Page 55 and 56: 2.4.2 Device Functions and Typical
- Page 57 and 58: and development (R&D) investments b
- Page 59: 2.5 Network Types and Precedents As
- Page 63 and 64: 2.5.3 1 - Wire® Network Limitation
- Page 65 and 66: with a single selected slave. If an
- Page 67 and 68: user group was founded in March of
- Page 69 and 70: protocol on multiple media for maxi
- Page 71 and 72: ecessive bit and the monitored stat
- Page 73 and 74: specification: Start-Of-Frame, Arbi
- Page 75 and 76: Cyclic Redundancy Check (CRC) Field
- Page 77 and 78: Arbitration FieldThe Arbitration Fi
- Page 79 and 80: SOF SOF Bit 28 Bit 27 Arbitration f
- Page 81 and 82: Afterwards it starts transmitting s
- Page 83 and 84: Figure 3.9 Structure of the Interfr
- Page 85 and 86: error occurs, an Error Frame is gen
- Page 87 and 88: Table 3.4 Error Flag Output Timing
- Page 89 and 90: 3.5.2 Error-Passive A node becomes
- Page 91 and 92: where tNBT is the Nominal Bit Time
- Page 93 and 94: Figure 3.12 Propagation Delay Betwe
- Page 95 and 96: 3.6.4 Synchronization t t t t (3.
- Page 97 and 98: opposite value is inserted into the
- Page 99 and 100: many systems, the bus length will b
- Page 101 and 102: CHAPTER 4 THE CHALLENGES OF INTERFA
- Page 103 and 104: In June 2004, Maxim Integrated Prod
- Page 105 and 106: Wearable sensor technology is a new
- Page 107 and 108: In traditional bus architectures, o
- Page 109 and 110: Figure 4.3 Centralized arbiter with
Often to describe measurements that are critical to 1 – Wire® network performance, two<br />
simple terms are used: radius and weight. The radius of a network is the wire distance from the<br />
1 – Wire® Master to the most distant slave and is measured in meters. The weight of a network<br />
is the total amount of connected wire in the network, and it too is measured in meters. In<br />
general, the weight of the network limits the rise time on the cable, while the radius establishes<br />
the timing of the slowest signal reflections [4].<br />
2.5.1 Slave Device Weight<br />
The weight that can be supported in a 1 – Wire® network is limited and depends on the<br />
driver (1 – Wire® Master interface). In simple terms, the weight can consist of many slaves on<br />
very little cable, or very few slaves on a lot of cable. Slave devices add equivalent weight to a<br />
network. Each device adds weight similar to that of a small length of wire, so devices can be<br />
rated in terms of their equivalent wire weight. Consequently, when a network is designed, the<br />
weight of the devices is an important consideration. A slave in iButton form usually<br />
contributes more weight than a slave packaged as a soldered-in component. iButtons add a<br />
weight of approximately 1m, and non-iButton slaves add a weight of approximately 0.5m [4].<br />
In addition to the weight added by the slave devices, circuit-board traces, connectors and ESD<br />
protection devices also contribute to the weight of a 1 – Wire® network. Although weight is<br />
influenced by many factors, capacitance is clearly the largest single contributor. As a general<br />
rule, the weight contribution of ESD circuits and PC-board traces can be related to their<br />
capacitance by a factor of approximately 24pF/m [4].<br />
35