DESIGN OF A CUSTOM ASIC INCORPORATING CAN™ AND 1 ...
DESIGN OF A CUSTOM ASIC INCORPORATING CAN™ AND 1 ... DESIGN OF A CUSTOM ASIC INCORPORATING CAN™ AND 1 ...
Whenever a new CAN node is added to the network and powered up, it should wait for a random amount of time and transmit a message with an address assignment pending status (Reserved bits = 01). The CAN Controller should start claiming addresses from zero and the message transmitted should have the highest priority CAN message ID which is stored in the Highest Priority ID register. The Address Claim Unit should monitor the CAN bus for the successful transmission of an address claim message. If there is a bus error which prevents this message from being successfully transmitted then the node should wait for a random amount of time before attempting retransmission (i.e., automatic retransmission disabled). After a successful transmission of an address claim message, the CAN node should monitor the bus for the response from other CAN nodes possibly having the same source address. If the CAN node does not receive a response within a specified amount of time, it can assume that it has successfully claimed the address. If it receives a message from another CAN node with the same source address, then the address status bits are checked. If the status bits indicate an address claim override and the newly received CAN ID has an equal or higher priority than the new CAN node, then the new node will try to claim the next available valid address. If the override/normal Tx message comes from a lower priority CAN ID, then the address claim message is retransmitted with override information so the other CAN node will release its address. The CAN node should continuously monitor the data bus to check for address claim messages and if any CAN node has the same address as its own, take appropriate action. The above procedure will result in a sequential address assignment to networked CAN nodes. For example, if there are 25 CAN nodes at the start of the first address claim 91
procedure, then the address claim process will result in addresses being assigned from zero to 24. If a new higher priority node is added to the CAN bus at a later time, all of the existing 25 CAN nodes will be bumped off to a lower priority address resulting in a complete reassignment of CAN node addresses. This problem can be avoided by reserving some addresses at regular intervals. These addresses can be claimed by the CAN nodes only if they are being bumped out of a valid address claimed status and cannot be claimed during the initial configuration [40]. The reader is referred to [40] for a complete state machine diagram of the address claim process. The last proposed method to solve the issue of bridging message ID-based and address- based protocols such as CAN and 1 – Wire® would require that the PIC® microcontroller and CAN Controller used in the prototype system be CANopen® compliant. One of the biggest challenges in developing the hardware for a CANopen® compliant node can be selecting the right part, as some 20 chip manufacturers produce microcontrollers with CANopen® compliant CAN interfaces. CANopen® is a CAN - based higher layer application protocol conceived for process control and automated manufacturing environments that, at present, is knowing widespread diffusion all over the world and, in particular, in the European countries. CANopen® requires that each device in the network be assigned a unique node address (Node – ID) before the normal operations are started. To this extent, the CANopen® specifications provide a means to remotely configure the addresses of the slave devices attached to the CAN bus. This technique, however, requires that each device has to be connected separately to a configuration tool. CANopen®, in fact, does not have a mechanism to identify, in an efficient and reliable way, the 92
- Page 65 and 66: with a single selected slave. If an
- Page 67 and 68: user group was founded in March of
- Page 69 and 70: protocol on multiple media for maxi
- Page 71 and 72: ecessive bit and the monitored stat
- Page 73 and 74: specification: Start-Of-Frame, Arbi
- Page 75 and 76: Cyclic Redundancy Check (CRC) Field
- Page 77 and 78: Arbitration FieldThe Arbitration Fi
- Page 79 and 80: SOF SOF Bit 28 Bit 27 Arbitration f
- Page 81 and 82: Afterwards it starts transmitting s
- Page 83 and 84: Figure 3.9 Structure of the Interfr
- Page 85 and 86: error occurs, an Error Frame is gen
- Page 87 and 88: Table 3.4 Error Flag Output Timing
- Page 89 and 90: 3.5.2 Error-Passive A node becomes
- Page 91 and 92: where tNBT is the Nominal Bit Time
- Page 93 and 94: Figure 3.12 Propagation Delay Betwe
- Page 95 and 96: 3.6.4 Synchronization t t t t (3.
- Page 97 and 98: opposite value is inserted into the
- Page 99 and 100: many systems, the bus length will b
- Page 101 and 102: CHAPTER 4 THE CHALLENGES OF INTERFA
- Page 103 and 104: In June 2004, Maxim Integrated Prod
- Page 105 and 106: Wearable sensor technology is a new
- Page 107 and 108: In traditional bus architectures, o
- Page 109 and 110: Figure 4.3 Centralized arbiter with
- Page 111 and 112: For the initial prototype design pr
- Page 113 and 114: the ID of 31 transmits a ‘0’ (d
- Page 115: Recently, a technique has been prop
- Page 119 and 120: paradigms are prevalent in the desi
- Page 121 and 122: systems possess a higher flexibilit
- Page 123 and 124: fixed identifier and hence a fixed
- Page 125 and 126: 348sm Cm 47 8 smbit 11-bit hea
- Page 127 and 128: est-case latency occurs when the bu
- Page 129 and 130: to break the 1 - Wire® network int
- Page 131 and 132: ow, is most critical for power deli
- Page 133 and 134: computations have device-specific p
- Page 135 and 136: Table 4.7 Example results with N 2
- Page 137 and 138: 4.3.5 Communication Speed Different
- Page 139 and 140: anging” a port pin on a microproc
- Page 141 and 142: From Figure 5.1, the block I/O pins
- Page 143 and 144: 5.2.2 Command Register In addition
- Page 145 and 146: specifies the selected bit value to
- Page 147 and 148: with i > m. This process is repeate
- Page 149 and 150: Figure 5.6 Interrupt Register. OW_
- Page 151 and 152: the INTR pin will be pulled high si
- Page 153 and 154: master reset occurs. Table 5.2 show
- Page 155 and 156: EN_FOW: Enable Force One Wire. Sett
- Page 157 and 158: READ_ROM - Used to read the 64-bit
- Page 159 and 160: 5.2.8.1 Single Search ROM (single_s
- Page 161 and 162: 5.2.8.3 Scratchpad Memory (scratchp
- Page 163 and 164: 5.2.8.4 Command Recognition (cmd_re
- Page 165 and 166: TBF - The Transmit Buffer provides
procedure, then the address claim process will result in addresses being assigned from zero to 24.<br />
If a new higher priority node is added to the CAN bus at a later time, all of the existing 25<br />
CAN nodes will be bumped off to a lower priority address resulting in a complete<br />
reassignment of CAN node addresses. This problem can be avoided by reserving some<br />
addresses at regular intervals. These addresses can be claimed by the CAN nodes only if they<br />
are being bumped out of a valid address claimed status and cannot be claimed during the initial<br />
configuration [40]. The reader is referred to [40] for a complete state machine diagram of the<br />
address claim process.<br />
The last proposed method to solve the issue of bridging message ID-based and address-<br />
based protocols such as CAN and 1 – Wire® would require that the PIC® microcontroller and<br />
CAN Controller used in the prototype system be CANopen® compliant. One of the biggest<br />
challenges in developing the hardware for a CANopen® compliant node can be selecting the<br />
right part, as some 20 chip manufacturers produce microcontrollers with CANopen® compliant<br />
CAN interfaces.<br />
CANopen® is a CAN - based higher layer application protocol conceived for process<br />
control and automated manufacturing environments that, at present, is knowing widespread<br />
diffusion all over the world and, in particular, in the European countries. CANopen® requires<br />
that each device in the network be assigned a unique node address (Node – ID) before the normal<br />
operations are started. To this extent, the CANopen® specifications provide a means to remotely<br />
configure the addresses of the slave devices attached to the CAN bus. This technique,<br />
however, requires that each device has to be connected separately to a configuration tool.<br />
CANopen®, in fact, does not have a mechanism to identify, in an efficient and reliable way, the<br />
92