15.08.2013 Views

Copyright Malvin Porter, Jr. 2010 - acumen - The University of ...

Copyright Malvin Porter, Jr. 2010 - acumen - The University of ...

Copyright Malvin Porter, Jr. 2010 - acumen - The University of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>The</strong> mean, range, standard deviation, internal consistencies, and correlations were calculated for<br />

the CBVS Action Choice (Prosocial vs. Aggressive) and the CBVS Justification Choices<br />

(Justice/Fair vs. Prosocial/Care vs. Aggressive/Retribution) for each story and across all four<br />

stories.<br />

While the initial parametric analyses for internal consistency and correlations within<br />

stories and subjects will be described in detail, results were found to be lower than anticipated.<br />

Even though alpha can take on any value less than or equal to 1, including negative values,<br />

higher values are more desirable; whereas, the rule <strong>of</strong> thumb requires a reliability <strong>of</strong> .70 or higher<br />

obtained on a substantial sample (Lomax, 2001). Specifically, the findings for CBVS Action<br />

Choice and CBVS Justification Choices revealed low positive to negative internal consistencies<br />

and low positive correlations between all four stories. Findings for within CBVS Aggressive<br />

Action Choices and CBVS Justification Choices for all four stories showed similar low internal<br />

consistencies and both positive and negative values. <strong>The</strong>se findings lead to the decision to not<br />

use a general linear model approach to assess the rated data; but rather, to focus on nonparametic<br />

analyses <strong>of</strong> the categorical ranked data. <strong>The</strong> nonparametric techniques subsequently used to<br />

perform the final analyses will be discussed following the analytic descriptions <strong>of</strong> the rated data.<br />

Table 3 presents the descriptive data and Cronbach alpha for the Prosocial Action Choice<br />

subscales by each story on the CBVS. <strong>The</strong> first consideration was to calculate the means for<br />

Prosocial Action Choice items for each story. However, internal consistencies for CBVS<br />

Prosocial Actions were low for all four stories with a relatively small sample. While bystander<br />

character/physical victimization story 1 and bystander character/relational victimization story 3<br />

showed moderately low (.3220, .2405 respectively) internal consistencies for Prosocial Actions,<br />

victim character/physical victimization story 2 showed a negative internal consistency (-2835)<br />

72

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!