15.08.2013 Views

Copyright Malvin Porter, Jr. 2010 - acumen - The University of ...

Copyright Malvin Porter, Jr. 2010 - acumen - The University of ...

Copyright Malvin Porter, Jr. 2010 - acumen - The University of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

scored above the 66 th percentile on victimization and at or below on the 66 th percentile on<br />

aggression. Bully/Victims were identified as children who scored above the 66 th percentile on<br />

aggression and above the 66 th percentile on victimization. Nonbully/nonvictims were identified<br />

as children who scored below the 66 th percentile on aggression and below the 66 th percentile on<br />

victimization. Precedent for this methodology can be found in Pellegrini et al. (1999), Schwartz<br />

(2000), and Huitsing, et al. (2007). See Table 2.<br />

Table 2<br />

Bully/Victim Group Membership Demographics<br />

Bully/Victim Membership Count Total Male Female<br />

Nonbully/Nonvictim 98 (62.0%) 45 (63.4%) 53 (60.9%)<br />

Victim 15 (9.5%) 9 (12.7%) 6 (6.9%)<br />

Bully 18 (11.3%) 7 (9.9%) 11 (12.6%)<br />

Bully/Victim 27 (17.1%) 10 (14.1%) 17 (19.5%)<br />

N = 158, n (male) = 71, n (female) = 87<br />

A Chi-Square (Ҳ 2 ) test on independence was used to determine whether or not there was a<br />

dependency between children’s Bully/Victim group membership as perceived by teachers and<br />

children’s selection <strong>of</strong> different categories CBVS Action Choices and different categories on<br />

CBVS Justification Choices.<br />

70

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!