Copyright Malvin Porter, Jr. 2010 - acumen - The University of ...
Copyright Malvin Porter, Jr. 2010 - acumen - The University of ...
Copyright Malvin Porter, Jr. 2010 - acumen - The University of ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Choices (e.g., Prosocial, Aggressive) and Justification Choices (e.g., Prosocial/Care,<br />
Aggressive/Retribution, Justice/Fair).<br />
Story Character Role. A Chi-Square (Ҳ 2 ) test <strong>of</strong> independence was used to determine<br />
whether or not there was a dependency between Story Character Role (e.g., Bystander, Victim)<br />
and children’s CBVS Action Choices (e.g., Prosocial, Aggressive) and Justification Choices (e.g.,<br />
Prosocial/Care, Aggressive/Retribution, Justice/Fair). Tests for differences in proportions were<br />
conducted to determine the difference in frequency (ƒ) in which the Story Character Role was a<br />
bystander or a victim and children’s CBVS Action Choices and Justification Choices.<br />
Story Form <strong>of</strong> Victimization. A Chi-Square (Ҳ 2 ) test <strong>of</strong> independence was used to<br />
determine whether or not there was a dependency between Story Form <strong>of</strong> Victimization (e.g.,<br />
Physical, Relational) children’s CBVS Action Choices (e.g., Prosocial, Aggressive) and<br />
Justification Choices (e.g., Prosocial/Care, Aggressive/Retribution, Justice/Fair). Tests for<br />
differences in proportion were conducted to determine the difference in frequency (ƒ) in which<br />
the Story Form <strong>of</strong> Victimization and children’s CBVS Action Choices and Justification Choices.<br />
Bully/Victim Group Membership. For the present study, composite variables were<br />
computed for four Bully/Victim groups: Nonbully/Nonvictim, Victim, Bully, Bully/Victim. To<br />
compute Bully/Victim group membership, an aggression score was computed for each child by<br />
summing five relational aggression items and four physical aggression items from the teacher-<br />
rated Children’s Social Behavior Scale (CSBS) and dividing by nine. A victimized score was<br />
computed by summing the three relational victimized items and three physical victimized items<br />
on the Children’s Social Experience Questionnaire (CSEQ) and dividing by six.<br />
Bullies were identified as children who scored above the 66 th percentile on aggression<br />
and at or below the 66 th percentile on victimization. Victims were identified as children who<br />
69