15.08.2013 Views

Copyright Malvin Porter, Jr. 2010 - acumen - The University of ...

Copyright Malvin Porter, Jr. 2010 - acumen - The University of ...

Copyright Malvin Porter, Jr. 2010 - acumen - The University of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Social Information Processing <strong>The</strong>ory<br />

Social information processing theory asserts that children’s understanding <strong>of</strong> social<br />

situations influences their subsequent behavior. Social information processing theory emphasizes<br />

decision-making in the context <strong>of</strong> differing social situations (Arsenio & Lemerise, 2004).<br />

Children enter into social situations with different social and biological abilities and diverse past<br />

experiences. Social information processing theory posits that past experiences and knowledge<br />

make up latent mental structures that represent past events which are stored in long-term<br />

memory. <strong>The</strong>se latent mental structures interact with and influence mental processing (Crick &<br />

Dodge, 1994) and are incorporated, in turn, with other memories into a general mental or<br />

knowledge structure that directs the processing <strong>of</strong> future social cues.<br />

Crick and Dodge (1994) theorized that children’s cognitive information processing<br />

occurs in distinct sequential steps. Children receive an assortment <strong>of</strong> social cues as input.<br />

Resulting behavioral responses are a function <strong>of</strong> how children process social cues. Social<br />

information processing steps include (1) encoding <strong>of</strong> social cues, (2) interpretation and mental<br />

representation <strong>of</strong> those cues, (3) clarification or selection <strong>of</strong> a goal, (4) response access or<br />

construction, (5) response decision, and (6) behavioral enactment.<br />

Crick and Dodge (1994) argued that children encode and interpret social cues by<br />

selectively attending to a contextualized external situation and to perceived internal cues.<br />

Children must attempt to understand the objective nature <strong>of</strong> what happened in a specific situation<br />

and attempt to understand why the event occurred. For example, a child who trips on a<br />

classmate’s foot must first figure out what happened (“I tripped on his feet”) and why it might<br />

have happened (“he tripped me” or “. It was an accident”). <strong>The</strong> interpretation <strong>of</strong> events is<br />

36

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!