15.08.2013 Views

Copyright Malvin Porter, Jr. 2010 - acumen - The University of ...

Copyright Malvin Porter, Jr. 2010 - acumen - The University of ...

Copyright Malvin Porter, Jr. 2010 - acumen - The University of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

symptoms <strong>of</strong> depression and other clinical symptoms when support from peers and teachers was<br />

high compared to when it was low (Conners-Burrow et al., 2009; Flashpohler et al., 2009).<br />

In contrast, Cullerston-Sen and Crick (2005) found that teachers were less likely to<br />

intervene in covert relational victimization than in cases <strong>of</strong> overt physical victimization; in part,<br />

because teachers were generally unaware <strong>of</strong> such experiences among their students. Studies have<br />

shown that teachers <strong>of</strong>ten identified girls who were the targets <strong>of</strong> vicious rumors, but teachers<br />

were not aware <strong>of</strong> peers exclusionary behaviors until severe experiences <strong>of</strong> exclusion caused the<br />

girls to contemplate suicide (Craig, Henderson, & Murphy, 2000; Owens, Slee, & Shute, 2000).<br />

Owens et al. (2000) suggest several reasons for why teachers may not be aware <strong>of</strong> children’s<br />

relational victimization. First, victimization becomes more complex and differentiated as<br />

children age and aggression becomes more covert, which makes it difficult to observe by the<br />

time students become teenagers (e.g., via instant messaging, stealing boyfriends).<br />

In summary, children who are victims <strong>of</strong> bullies and children who bully are associated<br />

with negative consequences (T. Nansel et al., 2001a; Rigby, 2001; Rigby, 2003), whereas social<br />

support has a positive influence on the behaviors and social-emotional health <strong>of</strong> children<br />

(Colarossi & Eccles, 2003; Demaray & Malecki, 2002; Gilman & Huebner, 2006a).<br />

Research on Children’s Social Reasoning<br />

Social-Cognitive Learning <strong>The</strong>ory<br />

Social-cognitive learning theory explains how children learn new behaviors and under<br />

what conditions they will exhibit the newly learned behavior. Social-cognitive learning theory is<br />

widely used to explain how children learn both desirable prosocial behaviors and undesirable<br />

antisocial aggressive behaviors (M. S. Tisak, Tisak, & Goldstein, 2006). Albert Bandura<br />

theorized that children base their behavioral judgments on the resultant outcomes they expect<br />

32

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!