Copyright Malvin Porter, Jr. 2010 - acumen - The University of ...

. Null Hypotheses: There is no relationship between the proportion of
teacher reports on the Aggressive With Peers subscale of the CBS and
children’s Justification Choices (e.g., Prosocial/Care,
Aggressive/Retribution, Justice/Fair).
6. Does children’s Gender, Story Character Role (e.g., Bystander, Victim), Story Bully
Form (e.g., Physical, Relational), and Bully/Victim Group Membership (e.g.,
Nonbully/Nonvictim, Victim, Bully, Bully/Victim,) relate to the frequency of
children’s CBVS Justification Choices (e.g., Justice/Fair, Prosocial/Care,
Aggressive/Retribution) and the frequency of their CBVS Action Choices (e.g.,
Prosocial, Aggressive)?
a. Null Hypotheses: There is no difference between the proportions of males
and females who choose Prosocial/Care Justifications, who choose
Aggression/Noncare Justifications, and who choose Justice/Fair
Justifications.
b. Hypotheses: There is no difference between the proportions of males and
females who choose Prosocial Actions and who choose Aggressive
Actions.
c. Null Hypotheses: There is no difference between the proportions of
Prosocial/Care Justification Choices, Aggressive/Retribution Justification
Choices, and Justice/Fair Justification Choices among children across
different Victim and Bystander Story Character Roles.
7