Copyright Malvin Porter, Jr. 2010 - acumen - The University of ...

c. Null Hypotheses: Of the children who make Justice/Fair Justification
Choices, there is no difference in proportion of those who make Prosocial
Action Choices and those who make Aggressive Action Choices.
4. Does the difference in proportions of teacher reports of children’s social behavior
with peers as assessed by the Prosocial with Peers subscale and the Aggressive
Behavior with Peers subscale of the Child Behavior Scale (CBS, Ladd & Profilet,
1996) relate children’s CBVS Action Choices that are coded as either Prosocial or
Aggressive?
a. Null Hypotheses: There is no relationship between the proportion of
teacher reports on the Prosocial with Peers subscale of the CBS and
children’s Action Choices (e.g., Prosocial, Aggressive).
b. Null Hypotheses: There is no relationship between the proportion of
teacher reports on the Aggressive with Peers subscale of the CBS and
children’s Action Choices (e.g., Prosocial, Aggressive).
5. Does the difference in proportions of teacher reports of children’s social behavior
with peers as assessed by the Prosocial with Peers subscale and the Aggressive
Behavior with Peers subscale of the Child Behavior Scale (CBS, Ladd & Profilet,
1996) relate children’s CBVS Justification Choices that are coded as either
Justice/Fair, Prosocial/Care, Aggressive/Retribution?
a. Null Hypotheses: There is no relationship between the proportion of
teacher reports on the Prosocial with Peers subscale of the CBS and
children’s Justification Choices (e.g., Prosocial/Care,
Aggressive/Retribution, Justice/Fair).
6