Putallaz, M., Grimes, C. L., Foster, K. J., Kupersmidt, J. B., Coie, J. D., & Dearing, K. (2007). Overt and relational aggression and victimization: Multiple perspectives within the school setting. Journal <strong>of</strong> School Psychology, 45, 523–547. Rabiner, D. L., & Coie, J. D. (1989). <strong>The</strong> effect <strong>of</strong> expectancy in inductions on rejected children's acceptance by unfamiliar peers. Developmental Psychology, 25, 450-457. Rabiner, D. L., Lenhart, L., & Lochman, J. E. (1990). Automatic versus reflective social problem solving in relation to children's sociometric status. Developmental Psychology, 26, 1010- 1016. Rest, J. R., Narvaez, D., Bebeau, M. J., & Thoma, S. (1999). Postconventional Moral Thinking: A Neo-Kohlbergian Approach. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Rest, J. R., Narvaez, D., Thoma, S. J., & Bebeau, M. J. (2000). A neo-Kohlbergian approach to morality research. Journal <strong>of</strong> Moral Education, 29(4). Richard, B. A., & Dodge, K. A. (1982). Social maladjustment and problem solving in schoolaged children. Journal <strong>of</strong> Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 50, 226-233. Richman, N., Stevenson, J., & Graham, P. J. (1982). Preschool to school: A behavioural study. London UK: Academic Press. Rigby, K. (2000). Effects <strong>of</strong> peer victimization in schools and perceived social support on adolescent well-being. Journal <strong>of</strong> Adolescence, 23, 57–68. Rigby, K. (2001). Health consequences <strong>of</strong> bullying and its prevention in schools. In J. Juvonen & S. Graham (Eds.), Peer harassment in school: <strong>The</strong> plight <strong>of</strong> the vulnerable and victimized (pp. 315–331). New York: Guilford Press. Rigby, K. (2002a). Stop the bullying: A handbook for teachers. Markham, Ontario: Pembroke Publishers. Rigby, K. (2002b). New perspectives on bullying. London: Jessica Kinglsey Publications. Rigby, K. (2003). Consequences <strong>of</strong> bullying in schools. Canadian Journal <strong>of</strong> Psychiatry, 48, 583–590. Roberts, W., & Strayer, J. (1996). Empathy, emotional expressiveness, and prosocial behavior. Child Development, 67, 449-470. Rock, E. A., Hammond, M., & Rasmussen, S. (2005). School-wide bullying prevention program for elementary students. Journal <strong>of</strong> Emotional Abuse, 4(3), 225-239. 178
Rogers, M. J., & Tisak, M. S. (1996). Children's reasoning about responses to peer aggression: Victims’ and witness's expected and prescribed behaviors. Aggressive Behavior, 22, 259- 269. Rubin, J. Z., Provenzano, F. J., & Luria, Z. (1974). <strong>The</strong> eye <strong>of</strong> the beholder: parents' view on sex <strong>of</strong> newborns. American Journal <strong>of</strong> Orthopsychiatry, 43, 720-731. Rubin, K. H., & Krasnor, L. R. (Eds.). (1986). Social cognitive and social behavioral perspectives on problem solving (Vol. 18). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Rule, B. G., & Ferguson, T. J. (1986). <strong>The</strong> effects <strong>of</strong> media violence on attitudes, emotions, and cognitions. Journal <strong>of</strong> Social Issues, 42, 29-50. Salmivall, C., & Nieminen, E. (2002). Proactive and reactive aggression among school bullies, victims, and bully-victims. Aggressive Behavior, 28, 30–44. Salmivalli, C. (2001). Group view on victimization: Empirical findings and their implications. In J. Juvonen & S. Graham (Eds.), Peer harassment in school. <strong>The</strong> plight <strong>of</strong> the vulnerable and victimized (pp. 398-419). New York, NY: Guilford. Salmivalli, C., & Isaacs, J. (2005). Prospective relations among victimization, rejection, friendlessness, and children's self- and peer-perceptions. Child Development, 76, 1161- 1171. Salmivalli, C., Kaukiainen, A., Kaistaniemi, L., & Lagerspetz, K. M. (1999). Self-evaluated selfesteem, peerevaluated self-esteem, and defensive egotism as predictors <strong>of</strong> adolescents’ participation in bullying situations. Personal Social Psychology <strong>of</strong> Bullying, 25, 1268- 1278. Salmivalli, C., Lagerspetz, K., Bjorkqvist, K., Osterman, K., & Kaukiainen, A. (1996). Bullying as a group process: Participant roles and their relations to social status within the group. Aggressive Behavior, 22, 1–15. Schwartz, D. (2000). Subtypes <strong>of</strong> victims and aggressors in children's peer groups. Journal <strong>of</strong> Abnormal Child Psychology, 28, 181–192. Schwartz, D., Dodge, K., Coie, J., Hubbard, J., Cillessen, A., Lemerise, E., et al. (1998). Socialcognitive and behavioural correlates <strong>of</strong> aggression and victimization in boys’ play groups. Journal <strong>of</strong> Abnormal Child Psychology, 26, 431–440. Schwartz, D., Dodge, K. A., & Coie, J. D. (1993). <strong>The</strong> emergence <strong>of</strong> chronic peer victimization in boys' play groups. Child Development, 64, 1755–1772. Schwartz, D., Dodge, K. A., Pettit, G. S., & Bates, J. E. (1997). <strong>The</strong> early socialization <strong>of</strong> aggressive victims <strong>of</strong> bullying. Child Development, 68, 665–675. 179
- Page 1 and 2:
CHILDREN’S SOCIAL REASONING IN TH
- Page 3 and 4:
ABSTRACT The purpose of this study
- Page 5 and 6:
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This dissertation w
- Page 7 and 8:
Victim ............................
- Page 9 and 10:
Story Character Role ..............
- Page 11 and 12:
LIST OF TABLES 1. CBVS Sample Demog
- Page 13 and 14:
30. Chi-Square (Ҳ 2 ) Test for Ind
- Page 15 and 16:
CHAPTER I: INTRODUCTION TO THE PROB
- Page 17 and 18:
anxiety, loneliness, and self-worth
- Page 19 and 20:
Research Questions and Hypotheses T
- Page 21 and 22:
. Null Hypotheses: There is no rela
- Page 23 and 24:
information will be helpful to prac
- Page 25 and 26:
Justice/Fair Justifications. An exp
- Page 27 and 28:
CHAPTER II: LITERATURE REVIEW Chapt
- Page 29 and 30:
actively involved, or as defenders
- Page 31 and 32:
who are victimized themselves), and
- Page 33 and 34:
Bullying often occurs within the co
- Page 35 and 36:
manipulate social relationships to
- Page 37 and 38:
Longitudinal studies of children en
- Page 39 and 40:
Bully Bullying also damages the bul
- Page 41 and 42:
for the nonbully/nonvictim. From co
- Page 43 and 44:
Being victimized has been correlate
- Page 45 and 46:
Linking Social Support and Bullying
- Page 47 and 48:
(Bandura, 1986, 1991). Bandura (198
- Page 49 and 50:
Social-cognitive learning theory ha
- Page 51 and 52:
influenced and guided by informatio
- Page 53 and 54:
ignore him or her, or that it is be
- Page 55 and 56:
(Dodge, 1980a; Dodge & Frame, 1982)
- Page 57 and 58:
during a child’s early years and
- Page 59 and 60:
The reader is reminded that the pur
- Page 61 and 62:
CBVS is scored by comparing the dif
- Page 63 and 64:
Other research suggests that childr
- Page 65 and 66:
their behaviors, which may explain
- Page 67 and 68:
Aggressive) and Justification Choic
- Page 69 and 70:
Cohen-Posey, 1995; Coloroso, 2003;
- Page 71 and 72:
children’s arrival, answered ques
- Page 73 and 74:
esponse to either being bullied or
- Page 75 and 76:
Peers (7 items) and the Aggressive
- Page 77 and 78:
Children’s Social Experience Ques
- Page 79 and 80:
Standard Deviations, ranges, and Cr
- Page 81 and 82:
Prosocial with Peers and CBS Aggres
- Page 83 and 84:
Choices (e.g., Prosocial, Aggressiv
- Page 85 and 86:
CHAPTER IV: RESULTS The purpose of
- Page 87 and 88:
for Prosocial Actions and victim ch
- Page 89 and 90:
Table 4 Psychometric Properties for
- Page 91 and 92:
all four stories. Bystander charact
- Page 93 and 94:
Victim character / relational victi
- Page 95 and 96:
Table 8 Psychometric Properties for
- Page 97 and 98:
Prosocial/Care justification or Jus
- Page 99 and 100:
Figure 1. Chi-Square (Ҳ2) Test for
- Page 101 and 102:
Figure 2. Chi-Square (Ҳ2) Test for
- Page 103 and 104:
Table 11 CBVS Chi-Square (Ҳ 2 ) Te
- Page 105 and 106:
Of the 187 responses to Prosocial/C
- Page 107 and 108:
of children’s Prosocial Action Ch
- Page 109 and 110:
Table 15 Predicting Action Choices
- Page 111 and 112:
Table 18 Predicting Action Choices
- Page 113 and 114:
participant child variable such as
- Page 115 and 116:
Figure 4. Chi-Square (Ҳ2) Test for
- Page 117 and 118:
A test for the Difference in Propor
- Page 119 and 120:
Figure 5. Chi-Square (Ҳ2) Test for
- Page 121 and 122:
Table 24 CBVS Test and Confidence I
- Page 123 and 124:
Therefore, I reject the null hypoth
- Page 125 and 126:
Figure 6. Chi-Square (Ҳ 2 ) Test f
- Page 127 and 128:
Table 28 CBVS Test and Confidence I
- Page 129 and 130:
Justice/Fair) on bystander and vict
- Page 131 and 132:
A test for the Difference in Propor
- Page 133 and 134:
of children’s Aggressive/Retribut
- Page 135 and 136:
Story Form of Victimization The nex
- Page 137 and 138:
A test for the Difference in Propor
- Page 139 and 140:
hypothesis and I conclude that ther
- Page 141 and 142: Figure 9. Chi-Square (Ҳ 2 ) Test f
- Page 143 and 144: Table 38 CBVS Test and Confidence I
- Page 145 and 146: Justice/Fair Justification Choice r
- Page 147 and 148: Figure 10. Chi-Square (Ҳ 2 ) Test
- Page 149 and 150: Figure 11. Chi-Square (Ҳ 2 ) Test
- Page 151 and 152: Action Choices in this study varied
- Page 153 and 154: CHAPTER V: DISCUSSION How people ju
- Page 155 and 156: y administering the measure in a in
- Page 157 and 158: get what they deserve.” It is lik
- Page 159 and 160: engaging in high rates of aggressiv
- Page 161 and 162: ability. The lack of variance in te
- Page 163 and 164: lie in the lack of variability in C
- Page 165 and 166: whether the story character was a b
- Page 167 and 168: Schwartz et al., 1998). These child
- Page 169 and 170: of the independent variable such as
- Page 171 and 172: strong component, which is directed
- Page 173 and 174: too long, given other curriculum-ba
- Page 175 and 176: REFERENCES Ableson, R. P. (1981). T
- Page 177 and 178: Brewster, A. B., & Bowen, G. L. (20
- Page 179 and 180: Craig, W. M., Henderson, K., & Murp
- Page 181 and 182: Dodge, K. A. (1980a). Social cognit
- Page 183 and 184: Frisch, M. B. (2000). Improving men
- Page 185 and 186: Haynie, D. L., Nansel, T. R., Eitel
- Page 187 and 188: Ladd, G. W., & Burgess, K. B. (2001
- Page 189 and 190: Munoz, M. A., & Vanderhaar, J. E. (
- Page 191: Paquette, J. A., & Underwood, M. K.
- Page 195 and 196: Smokowski, P. R., Reynolds, A. J.,
- Page 197 and 198: Turiel, E. (2006). Thought, emotion
- Page 199 and 200: APPENDICES 185
- Page 201 and 202: Date, ______________, 2009 Malvin (
- Page 203 and 204: Appendix C School Approvals 189
- Page 205 and 206: 191
- Page 207 and 208: Appendix D Informed Consent Forms 1
- Page 209 and 210: 195
- Page 211 and 212: 197
- Page 213 and 214: Asian American European Ame
- Page 215 and 216: Rate each reason for how good you t
- Page 217 and 218: III. Of all the actions that you ju
- Page 219 and 220: 5. Talk to Mike about his feelings
- Page 221 and 222: 4. Make up something about the mean
- Page 223 and 224: Appendix F Teacher Online Questionn
- Page 225 and 226: fights with peers. 1 = Never True 2
- Page 227 and 228: • Make new friends / change peer
- Page 229 and 230: • Get bullies to think about thei
- Page 231 and 232: 217