Copyright Malvin Porter, Jr. 2010 - acumen - The University of ...

of the independent variable such as Action Choices and Justification Choices because each
child’s responses for story 1 will be compared to that of stories 2, 3, and 4. The resulting
variances between each story will reflect relative strengths and weaknesses of each story.
In contrast, a fundamental disadvantage of the within-story design is "carryover effect"
(e.g., practice, memory imprinting, fatigue, boredom), which means that the a child’s responses
in one story may effect performance in the other three stories, thus creating a confounding
extraneous variable that varies with the independent Action and Justification Choice variables.
Another study should include specific gender differentiation with respect to Story
Character Roles and Story Forms of Victimization among the population sample.
Still other interesting study should attempt to identify clusters of children who sometimes
justify aggressive actions with prosocial justifications. One research objective should correlates
with this pattern of reasoning, such as children’s intellectual ability, bully/victim group
membership, gender, roles, or forms of victimization?
Possible Interventions for CBVS Inclusion
Findings from this study have implications for implementing effective interventions
aimed at reducing rates of bully victimization among children in elementary schools.
First, an important point of intervention would be to make children aware of how they
rationalize their aggressive actions in response to bully victimization.
Social Support Intervention Programs
In contrast to supporting or reinforcing bullying, peers may also play an important role in
discouraging bullying or minimizing the negative effects of being victimized by bullies. This is
because peers who defend against bullying may instrumental in promoting ant bullying behaviors
(Sutton & Smith, 1999). Research highlights the value of uninvolved children or “bystanders”
155