Copyright Malvin Porter, Jr. 2010 - acumen - The University of ...

Copyright Malvin Porter, Jr. 2010 - acumen - The University of ... Copyright Malvin Porter, Jr. 2010 - acumen - The University of ...

acumen.lib.ua.edu
from acumen.lib.ua.edu More from this publisher
15.08.2013 Views

aggressive behavioral patterns are highly salient predictors for other risk factors in children's development such as peer rejection, delinquency, criminality, mental illness, underachievement, and dropping out of school. Aggression with peers may likely to put children on a negative developmental course for future social difficulties in adolescence and adulthood. This has implications for preventive interventions that expose maladaptive social competencies and provide prosocial strategies for solving peer conflict and dealing with social stress. Preventive education and counseling may also provide critical reflective strategies for enhancing prosocial values and beliefs about peer relationships. Child Variables Intellectual Ability Previous research finds that children’s social behavior is related to their intellectual ability. Dodge (1986) argued that children’s social information processing skills are determined at least in part by intelligence and that those skills are determined in part by intelligence. Specifically, children of lower intelligence are more likely to be physically aggressive with peers than children of higher intelligence. More recent research found that adaptive emotion-regulation strategies, aggressive-response generation, and problem-solving response generation were all related to adolescents’ intelligence; however, hostile attribution of intent was not related to intelligence (Nas et al., 2005). Therefore, it is reasonable to expect that children’s Action and Justification Choices will co-vary with their intellectual ability. However, this study found that neither CBVS Action Choices nor CBVS Justification Choices varied with teacher-reports of children’s intellectual ability. The vast majority of children in this study were classified by teachers as Average in intellectual ability. Very few children were classified as Above Average/High in intellectual 146

ability. The lack of variance in teacher-reports of children’s intellectual ability may explain the non-significant relations between this variable and CBVS Action Choices and CBVS Justification Choices. This measure was intended to serve as a proxy measure for children’s intellectual ability and as a statistical control in subsequent data analyses. This analytic strategy is supported by previous findings that children’s social information processing skills, which include self- regulating emotions, developing social problem-solving strategies, and generating prosocial and aggressive responses, are determined at least in part by intelligence; specifically, that children of lower intelligence are more likely to be physically aggressive with peers than children of higher intelligence (Dodge, 1986). Bully/Victim Group Membership This study found that neither CBVS Action Choices nor Justification Choices varied across participant children’s teacher reported Bully/Victim Group Membership. In support of this strategy, many studies cite the prevalence of negative psychosocial and behavioral effects resulting from victimization on bully/victim group members (Flashpohler et al., 2009; Huitsing et al., 2007; Olweus, 1993; Veenstra et al., 2005). As with children’s Intellectual Ability, it was hoped that children’s Bully/Victim Group Membership would serve as another statistical control in subsequent data analyses. One explanation for the invariance of Bully/Victim Group Membership across CBVS Action Choices and Justification Choices may be that in this study there were insufficient numbers in each group, particularly in the Bully/Victim group, to account for a significant group effect. Indirect Assessments Versus Direct Assessments One of the issues of this study involves the validity and reliability of comparing indirect teacher-reports of children’s social competencies, such as CBS prosocial and aggressive behavior 147

aggressive behavioral patterns are highly salient predictors for other risk factors in children's<br />

development such as peer rejection, delinquency, criminality, mental illness, underachievement,<br />

and dropping out <strong>of</strong> school. Aggression with peers may likely to put children on a negative<br />

developmental course for future social difficulties in adolescence and adulthood. This has<br />

implications for preventive interventions that expose maladaptive social competencies and<br />

provide prosocial strategies for solving peer conflict and dealing with social stress. Preventive<br />

education and counseling may also provide critical reflective strategies for enhancing prosocial<br />

values and beliefs about peer relationships.<br />

Child Variables<br />

Intellectual Ability<br />

Previous research finds that children’s social behavior is related to their intellectual<br />

ability. Dodge (1986) argued that children’s social information processing skills are determined<br />

at least in part by intelligence and that those skills are determined in part by intelligence.<br />

Specifically, children <strong>of</strong> lower intelligence are more likely to be physically aggressive with peers<br />

than children <strong>of</strong> higher intelligence. More recent research found that adaptive emotion-regulation<br />

strategies, aggressive-response generation, and problem-solving response generation were all<br />

related to adolescents’ intelligence; however, hostile attribution <strong>of</strong> intent was not related to<br />

intelligence (Nas et al., 2005).<br />

<strong>The</strong>refore, it is reasonable to expect that children’s Action and Justification Choices will<br />

co-vary with their intellectual ability. However, this study found that neither CBVS Action<br />

Choices nor CBVS Justification Choices varied with teacher-reports <strong>of</strong> children’s intellectual<br />

ability. <strong>The</strong> vast majority <strong>of</strong> children in this study were classified by teachers as Average in<br />

intellectual ability. Very few children were classified as Above Average/High in intellectual<br />

146

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!