15.08.2013 Views

Copyright Malvin Porter, Jr. 2010 - acumen - The University of ...

Copyright Malvin Porter, Jr. 2010 - acumen - The University of ...

Copyright Malvin Porter, Jr. 2010 - acumen - The University of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

engaging in high rates <strong>of</strong> aggressive behavior with peers. <strong>The</strong> lack <strong>of</strong> variation in these two<br />

variables may have limited the ability to detect a statistically significant relationship. A larger<br />

sample with more variance is needed to further explore the relationships between these variables.<br />

Because the backwards stepwise regression procedure eliminated both CBS variables for<br />

predicting CBVS Action Choices makes this methodological model suspect to doubt. Similarly,<br />

the multinominial regression procedure may be suspect to doubt as a methodological model<br />

because it failed to produce significant results for CBVS Justification Choices.<br />

Additionally, the low numbers <strong>of</strong> children participating in the study who chose<br />

aggressive actions on the CBVS may suggest a chance <strong>of</strong> being wrong a greater percentage <strong>of</strong><br />

time than correct. In contrast to the preponderance <strong>of</strong> research to the contrary, some researchers<br />

might argue that aggressive bullying behavior tends to occur when adults are either not around or<br />

when adults are not looking and that children; and, therefore, teachers may differ in their reports<br />

about children’s behavior, especially about children’s antisocial, aggressive behavior (Veenstraa<br />

et al., 2008). A problematic issue in this study with regard to relating teacher-report perceptions<br />

<strong>of</strong> children’s Aggressive Behavior with Peers to child-report perceptions <strong>of</strong> bullying with peers<br />

is that the CBS asks teachers to identify children who are perpetrators <strong>of</strong> bullying; whereas,<br />

CBVS asks children how they would respond to a perpetrator. Teachers may not have knowledge<br />

about how children think in these situations. One implication for intervention is that teachers<br />

need to be informed about how children’s cognitive processes vary when they are deciding how<br />

to respond to victimization.<br />

It is important to note that the CBVS parametric analyses revealed significant internal<br />

consistencies and correlations for Aggressive Actions Choices and Aggressive/Retribution<br />

Justifications. One reason this is important is because Ladd and Pr<strong>of</strong>ilet (1996) found that<br />

145

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!