Aggravated, Exemplary and Restitutionary ... - Law Commission
Aggravated, Exemplary and Restitutionary ... - Law Commission
Aggravated, Exemplary and Restitutionary ... - Law Commission
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
‘moderation’ <strong>and</strong> of ‘proportionality’, which are each a vital part of the law’s<br />
protection of the rights of wrongdoers, require this.<br />
(iii) Exceptions to the general principle of several liability to punitive damages:<br />
vicarious liability <strong>and</strong> partnerships<br />
1.204 We consider that two exceptions are required to the principle that liability to<br />
punitive damages should be ‘several’, rather than joint or joint <strong>and</strong> several. The<br />
first is the doctrine of vicarious liability. The second is the liability of partners for<br />
wrongs of their co-partners. We therefore recommend that:<br />
(35) recommendation (34) (‘several liability’, rather than joint or joint<br />
<strong>and</strong> several liability shall apply to punitive damages) is without<br />
prejudice to:<br />
(a) our recommendation that vicarious liability to pay punitive<br />
damages should be retained; (Draft Bill, clause 8(2)(a))<br />
(b) the liability of a partner for the wrongs of his co-partner.<br />
(Draft Bill, clause 8(2)(b))<br />
We explain the exception for vicarious liability below, 747<br />
but it is convenient at this<br />
point to explain the exception for the liability of partners for co-partners.<br />
1.205 Partners are jointly <strong>and</strong> severally liable to any persons who are not themselves<br />
partners for the wrongs committed by any partner acting in the ordinary course of<br />
the business of the ‘firm’ or with the authority of his co-partners. 748<br />
That liability<br />
is expressed to include a liability for “penalties” imposed as a result of the wrongful<br />
conduct. 749<br />
Prima facie section 10 of the Partnership Act 1890 also makes partners<br />
jointly <strong>and</strong> severally liable to pay punitive damages in respect of the wrong of a copartner.<br />
We have been unable to discover any case in which partners have been<br />
held to be so liable, or in which the point is even discussed. But we do consider<br />
that this could properly occur. Accordingly, our proposal that any liability to<br />
punitive damages should be several (rather than joint, or joint <strong>and</strong> several) is<br />
subject to the qualification that it should not affect the (joint <strong>and</strong> several) liability<br />
of ‘innocent’ partners to pay punitive damages in respect of the wrongs of a copartner.<br />
(iv) The right to contribution under the Civil Liability (Contribution) Act 1978<br />
1.206 The Civil Liability (Contribution) Act 1978 provides that any person who is<br />
“liable in respect of any damage” suffered by another may recover contribution<br />
747 See paras 5.209-5.230 below.<br />
748 Section 10 of the Partnership Act 1890 provides:<br />
Where by any wrongful act or omission of any partner acting in the ordinary<br />
course of the business of the firm, or with the authority of his co-partners, loss or<br />
injury is caused to any person not being a partner in the firm, or any penalty is<br />
incurred, the firm is liable therefor to the same extent as the partner so acting or<br />
omitting to act.<br />
749 Partnership Act 1890, s 10.<br />
157