15.08.2013 Views

Aggravated, Exemplary and Restitutionary ... - Law Commission

Aggravated, Exemplary and Restitutionary ... - Law Commission

Aggravated, Exemplary and Restitutionary ... - Law Commission

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

‘moderation’ <strong>and</strong> of ‘proportionality’, which are each a vital part of the law’s<br />

protection of the rights of wrongdoers, require this.<br />

(iii) Exceptions to the general principle of several liability to punitive damages:<br />

vicarious liability <strong>and</strong> partnerships<br />

1.204 We consider that two exceptions are required to the principle that liability to<br />

punitive damages should be ‘several’, rather than joint or joint <strong>and</strong> several. The<br />

first is the doctrine of vicarious liability. The second is the liability of partners for<br />

wrongs of their co-partners. We therefore recommend that:<br />

(35) recommendation (34) (‘several liability’, rather than joint or joint<br />

<strong>and</strong> several liability shall apply to punitive damages) is without<br />

prejudice to:<br />

(a) our recommendation that vicarious liability to pay punitive<br />

damages should be retained; (Draft Bill, clause 8(2)(a))<br />

(b) the liability of a partner for the wrongs of his co-partner.<br />

(Draft Bill, clause 8(2)(b))<br />

We explain the exception for vicarious liability below, 747<br />

but it is convenient at this<br />

point to explain the exception for the liability of partners for co-partners.<br />

1.205 Partners are jointly <strong>and</strong> severally liable to any persons who are not themselves<br />

partners for the wrongs committed by any partner acting in the ordinary course of<br />

the business of the ‘firm’ or with the authority of his co-partners. 748<br />

That liability<br />

is expressed to include a liability for “penalties” imposed as a result of the wrongful<br />

conduct. 749<br />

Prima facie section 10 of the Partnership Act 1890 also makes partners<br />

jointly <strong>and</strong> severally liable to pay punitive damages in respect of the wrong of a copartner.<br />

We have been unable to discover any case in which partners have been<br />

held to be so liable, or in which the point is even discussed. But we do consider<br />

that this could properly occur. Accordingly, our proposal that any liability to<br />

punitive damages should be several (rather than joint, or joint <strong>and</strong> several) is<br />

subject to the qualification that it should not affect the (joint <strong>and</strong> several) liability<br />

of ‘innocent’ partners to pay punitive damages in respect of the wrongs of a copartner.<br />

(iv) The right to contribution under the Civil Liability (Contribution) Act 1978<br />

1.206 The Civil Liability (Contribution) Act 1978 provides that any person who is<br />

“liable in respect of any damage” suffered by another may recover contribution<br />

747 See paras 5.209-5.230 below.<br />

748 Section 10 of the Partnership Act 1890 provides:<br />

Where by any wrongful act or omission of any partner acting in the ordinary<br />

course of the business of the firm, or with the authority of his co-partners, loss or<br />

injury is caused to any person not being a partner in the firm, or any penalty is<br />

incurred, the firm is liable therefor to the same extent as the partner so acting or<br />

omitting to act.<br />

749 Partnership Act 1890, s 10.<br />

157

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!