REFORMING INSURANCE LAW: - Law Commission
REFORMING INSURANCE LAW: - Law Commission
REFORMING INSURANCE LAW: - Law Commission
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
4.23 The section is hardly a model of clarity, and Treasury Review II, 2004, has proposed two<br />
major reforms which have been adopted by the revised version of s 21A in the draft Insurance<br />
Contracts Amendment Bill 2007. First, the section should extend to renewals: 100 the reason why<br />
it was initially confined just to placement is uncertain. As is noted in the explanatory notes to the<br />
2007 Bill, the change will mean that insurers will have to ask specific questions both on<br />
placement, renewal and on any variation or reinstatement of the policy, 101 a duty which could be<br />
satisfied by, for example, providing the assured with a copy of his previous answers, although<br />
that approach is not to be mandatory. Secondly, and far more importantly, Treasury Review II<br />
recommended the repeal of the exceptional circumstances provisions of s 21A(4)(b) in order to<br />
match its proposed amendment of the “prudent assured” test in s 21(1)(b) which is to take into<br />
account specific questions asked by insurers. 102 The effect of the proposed amendment is to<br />
remove entirely the right of insurers to ask “catch all” questions even to pick up information<br />
about exceptional circumstances: instead the risk that such exceptional circumstances might exist<br />
is to be borne by the insurers. The draft revised, and far more clear and logical, version of s 21A<br />
is as follows<br />
21A.—(1) This section applies to an eligible contract of insurance.<br />
(2) The insurer is taken to have waived compliance with the duty of disclosure in<br />
relation to the contract unless, before the contract is entered into, the insurer requests the<br />
insured to answer one or more specific questions that are relevant to the decision of the<br />
insurer whether to accept the risk and, if so, on what terms.<br />
(3) If:<br />
(a) in accordance with subsection (2), the insurer requests the insured to<br />
answer one or more specific questions; and<br />
(b) the insurer asks the insured to disclose to the insurer any other matters<br />
that would be covered by the duty of disclosure in relation to the contract;<br />
the insurer is taken to have waived compliance with the duty of disclosure in relation to<br />
those matters.<br />
(4) If:<br />
(a) in accordance with subsection (2), the insurer requests the insured to<br />
answer one or more specific questions; and<br />
(b) in answer to each specific question, the insured discloses each matter that:<br />
(i) is known to the insured; and<br />
(ii) a reasonable person in the circumstances could be expected to<br />
have disclosed in answer to that question;<br />
the insured is taken to have complied with the duty of disclosure in relation to the<br />
contract.<br />
(5) In this section: eligible contract of insurance means a contract of insurance that is<br />
specified in the regulations.<br />
100<br />
Recommendation 4.2.<br />
101<br />
The definition of entering into a contract of insurance includes extension or variation: Insurance Contracts Act<br />
1984, s 11(9).<br />
102<br />
Recommendation 4.2.<br />
24