15.08.2013 Views

REFORMING INSURANCE LAW: - Law Commission

REFORMING INSURANCE LAW: - Law Commission

REFORMING INSURANCE LAW: - Law Commission

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

third party rights, but that section is confined to the right to recover: it says nothing about<br />

insurers owing any separate duties to third parties. The proposals do not align the rights of third<br />

parties with those of the assured in all cases, but there are a number of situations in which third<br />

parties have been given equivalent rights. Under the proposals:<br />

(1) There is a definition of “third party beneficiary” in s 11(1), being “a person who<br />

is not a party to the contract but is specified or referred to in the contract,<br />

whether by name or otherwise, as a person to whom the insurance cover provided<br />

by the contract extends.”<br />

(2) New ss 13(3)-(4) extend the insurers’ post-contractual duty of utmost good faith<br />

to a third party beneficiary. This means that claims handling and other obligations<br />

owed by insurers to the assured under s 13 are extended to beneficiaries. 552<br />

(3) Third party beneficiaries are entitled to the benefits conferred by s 41 of the 1984<br />

Act, so that a liability insurer owes the same duties to provide information to a<br />

third party beneficiary as he does to the assured: this point is discussed in more<br />

detail above.<br />

(4) Third party beneficiaries are to be given the right to receive policy documents<br />

under a revised version of s 74 of the 1984 Act.<br />

(5) The existing right of a third party under s 48 to make a claim under the policy is<br />

to be redrafted so as to import references to third party beneficiaries as defined in<br />

the addition to s 11(1). However, it is to be made clear under the revised version<br />

of s 48(3) that, in defending an action by a third party beneficiary, the insurers<br />

may raise, as against the third party beneficiary, any defence relating to the precontract<br />

or post-contract conduct of the assured, so that the beneficiary is subject<br />

to defences based on non-disclosure, misrepresentation or breach of one or other<br />

policy provision. 553<br />

(6) Subrogation rights are not to be exercised against third party beneficiaries.<br />

Variation of contracts of insurance<br />

8.51 Section 53 of the Insurance Contracts Act 1984 outlaws any term which confers upon<br />

insurers the right to vary unilaterally the terms of the policy, to the prejudice of the assured or<br />

any third party. The section is limited in its operation to policies declared by the Insurance<br />

Contracts Regulations 1985. The list of policies excluded from s 53 554 is: construction;<br />

commercial; mechanical breakdown; products liability; accidental loss; credit; life;<br />

superannuation; sickness and accident; export credits; and aviation liability. In essence,<br />

therefore, domestic policies alone are covered. It may be, in the light of the extension of all but<br />

domestic policies, that this provision is replicated by the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts<br />

Regulations 1999, and indeed the 1999 Regulations may have wider effect.<br />

552 A position reached by the courts in any event: Wylie v National Mutual Life Association of Australasia Limited<br />

(1997) 217 ALR 324; Hannover Life Re of Australasia Limited v Sayseng [2005] NSWCA 214; Dumitrov v S C<br />

Johnson & Son Superannuation Pty Ltd [2006] NSWSC 1372.<br />

553 These changes are extended to ss 48A and 48AA.<br />

554 SR 1985 No 162, reg 31, as amended by SR 2000 No 118.<br />

104

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!