15.08.2013 Views

Journal of Accident Investigation

Journal of Accident Investigation

Journal of Accident Investigation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Testing and Simulation<br />

Full-Scale Crash Testing<br />

NHTSA reviewed data from its Fatality Analysis Reporting<br />

System (FARS), National Automotive Sampling System<br />

(NASS), General Estimates System (GES), and Special Crash<br />

<strong>Investigation</strong>s (SCI), as well as State and local crash data and<br />

data from the Safety Board. NHTSA found that the most<br />

significant factors in two-vehicle, fatal school bus crashes<br />

were that they occurred on roadways with posted speed limits<br />

between -60 mph and that they involved heavy trucks.<br />

Based on these findings, NHTSA designed two full-scale crash<br />

tests to represent the real-world environment <strong>of</strong> large school<br />

bus crashes.<br />

Frontal Crash Test - The first crash test was conducted<br />

by frontally impacting a conventional school bus into a rigid<br />

barrier at 30 mph. The impact speed was chosen to ensure<br />

that sufficient energy would be imparted to the occupants to<br />

evaluate the protective capability <strong>of</strong> compartmentalization, and<br />

to provide a level at which other methods for occupant injury<br />

mitigation could be evaluated during sled testing. A 30-mph<br />

impact into the rigid barrier is also equivalent to two vehicles<br />

<strong>of</strong> similar size impacting at a closing speed <strong>of</strong> approximately 60<br />

mph, which NHTSA found to be prevalent in their review <strong>of</strong><br />

crash data sources.<br />

Figures 8 and 9 show the frontally impacted bus before and<br />

after the impact. As is typical <strong>of</strong> large school buses, the body <strong>of</strong><br />

the bus was mounted to the frame rails <strong>of</strong> the chassis by a series<br />

<strong>of</strong> clips or clamps. This non-rigid mounting feature allowed<br />

the bus body to slide forward approximately 36 inches during<br />

impact (see figure 10). This dissipation <strong>of</strong> impact energy over a<br />

longer time reduced the acceleration levels experienced by the<br />

vehicle’s occupants.<br />

Accelerometers were positioned along the center aisle <strong>of</strong> the<br />

bus body to record accelerations during the crash. Ten dummies<br />

were used in the test: five Hybrid II and III 0th percentile adult<br />

male (representing adult and large, teenaged occupants), two<br />

Hybrid III th percentile adult females (representing average<br />

12-year-old occupants), and three Hybrid II and III<br />

6-year-olds. Four <strong>of</strong> the ten were ballast dummies, which were<br />

placed throughout the bus. See figure 11.<br />

Table 2 contains the dummy injury values for the frontal<br />

crash tests. The neck injury (Nij) value was calculated based<br />

on the criteria being used for the revised FMVSS No. 208,11<br />

“Occupant Protection.” The pass/fail criterion for Nij was 1.0,<br />

11 Code <strong>of</strong> Federal Regulations, Title 49, Chapter V–National Highway<br />

Traffic Safety Administration, Department <strong>of</strong> Transportation, Federal<br />

Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS) No. 71.208; Occupant Crash<br />

Protection.<br />

OCCUPANT SAFETY IN LARGE SCHOOL BUSES<br />

Figure 8. The school bus in the frontal impact scenario before the impact.<br />

Figure 9. The school bus in the frontal impact scenario after the impact.<br />

Figure 10. Displacement <strong>of</strong> the bus body on the<br />

chassis during frontal impact.<br />

NTSB JOURNAL OF ACCIDENT INVESTIGATION, SPRING 2006; VOLUME 2, ISSUE 1 61

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!