14.08.2013 Views

Xilinx XC9536 CPLD - Smithsonian - The Chip Collection

Xilinx XC9536 CPLD - Smithsonian - The Chip Collection

Xilinx XC9536 CPLD - Smithsonian - The Chip Collection

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Report Number: SCA 9212-568<br />

Construction Analysis<br />

<strong>Xilinx</strong> <strong>XC9536</strong><br />

<strong>CPLD</strong><br />

Serving the Global Semiconductor Industry Since 1964<br />

17350 N. Hartford Drive<br />

Scottsdale, AZ 85255<br />

Phone: 602-515-9780<br />

Fax: 602-515-9781<br />

e-mail: ice@ice-corp.com<br />

Internet: http://www.ice-corp.com<br />

®


TITLE<br />

INDEX TO TEXT<br />

PAGE<br />

INTRODUCTION 1<br />

MAJOR FINDINGS 1<br />

TECHNOLOGY DESCRIPTION<br />

Packaging/Assembly 2<br />

Die Process 2 - 3<br />

ANALYSIS RESULTS I<br />

Assembly 4<br />

ANALYSIS RESULTS II<br />

TABLES<br />

Die Process 5 - 7<br />

Procedure 8<br />

Overall Quality Evaluation 9<br />

Package Markings 10<br />

Die Material Analysis 10<br />

Horizontal Dimensions 11<br />

Vertical Dimensions 12


INTRODUCTION<br />

This report describes a construction analysis of the <strong>Xilinx</strong> <strong>XC9536</strong> <strong>CPLD</strong>. One device<br />

packaged in a 44-pin VQFP (very small quad flat pack) with gull wing leads for surface<br />

mount applications was provided. <strong>The</strong> part was date coded 9633.<br />

Questionable Items: 1<br />

MAJOR FINDINGS<br />

• Metal 2 aluminum thinned up to 100 percent 2 at some vias (Figure 15) and metal 1<br />

aluminum thinned up to 100 percent 2 at some contacts (Figures 21 and 22). Barrier<br />

metal maintained continuity.<br />

Special Features:<br />

• Fast FLASH technology.<br />

• Sub-micron gates (0.45 micron N-channel, 0.5 micron P-channel).<br />

1 <strong>The</strong>se items present possible quality or reliability concerns. <strong>The</strong>y should be discussed<br />

with the manufacturer to determine their possible impact on the intended application.<br />

2 Seriousness depends on design margins.<br />

- 1 -


Packaging/Assembly:<br />

TECHNOLOGY DESCRIPTION<br />

• <strong>The</strong> device was encapsulated in a 44-pin very small quad flat pack with gull wing<br />

leads.<br />

• Lead locking provisions (anchors) at all pins.<br />

• <strong>The</strong>rmosonic ball bond method using gold wire.<br />

• Sawn dicing (full depth).<br />

• Silver (Ag) epoxy die attach.<br />

Die Process:<br />

• Fabrication: Twin-well CMOS, selective oxidation process. P substrate and no epi.<br />

• Final passivation: A layer of silicon-nitride over silicon-dioxide.<br />

• Metallization: Two levels of aluminum interconnect patterned by dry-etch<br />

techniques. A titanium-nitride (TiN) cap and barrier metal were employed with both<br />

metal levels. Standard vias and contacts were employed (no plugs).<br />

• Interlevel dielectric: Two layers of silicon-dioxide. A spin-on-glass (SOG) was<br />

used between these layers for planarization purposes. No evidence of chemical<br />

mechanical planarization (CMP) was present.<br />

• Pre-metal glass: A thick reflow glass over various densified oxides. It appeared to<br />

have been reflowed prior to contact cuts only.<br />

• Polysilicon: Two layers of polysilicon were present. Poly 1 was used exclusively in<br />

the array for floating gates and poly 2 (poly and tungsten silicide) was used for all<br />

standard gates on the die and word and program lines in the array.<br />

- 2 -


TECHNOLOGY DESCRIPTION (continued)<br />

• Diffusions: Transistors were formed using an LDD process in which the oxide sidewall<br />

spacers were left in place. Implanted N+ and P+ sources/drains. No silicide was used at<br />

diffusions.<br />

• Twin-wells were used in a P substrate. No epi was present. A step was present in the<br />

oxide at the well boundaries.<br />

• No buried contacts were employed on this device.<br />

• Memory cells: <strong>The</strong> programmable array consisted of EEPROM cells (Fast FLASH<br />

technology). Metal 2 was used to form "piggyback" word and program lines.<br />

Metal 1 distributed the bit lines and GND. Poly 2 formed the word and program<br />

lines and poly 1 formed the floating gates. <strong>The</strong> interpoly dielectric consisted of<br />

ONO (oxide-nitride-oxide).<br />

• Design features: Metal 2 bus lines were slotted for stress relief. Some isolated vias<br />

were present on the die which may be used for probing purposes (see Figure 4).<br />

- 3 -


Assembly :<br />

Questionable Items: None.<br />

General Items:<br />

ANALYSIS RESULTS I<br />

• 44-pin VQFP plastic packages with gull wing leads.<br />

- 4 -<br />

Figures 1 and 6<br />

• Overall package quality: Normal. No defects were found on the external portions of<br />

the package.<br />

• Leadframe: Lead-locking provisions (anchors) were present at all pins.<br />

• Die attach: <strong>The</strong> die was attached to the header with silver-epoxy of normal quality.<br />

• Die dicing: Die separation was by sawing with normal quality workmanship. No<br />

cracks or large chipouts were found in the die.<br />

• Wirebonding: <strong>The</strong>rmosonic ball bond method using gold wire. Bonds were well<br />

formed and placement was good. Bond pad pitch was tight (117 microns);<br />

however, no problems were noted and wire spacing was good. Bond pad structure<br />

employed both metals.


Die Process :<br />

Questionable Items: 1<br />

ANALYSIS RESULTS II<br />

2Seriousness depends on design margins.<br />

- 5 -<br />

Figures 2 - 37<br />

• Metal 2 aluminum thinned up to 100 percent 2 at some vias (Figure 15) and metal 1<br />

aluminum thinned up to 100 percent 2 at some contacts (Figures 21 and 22). Barrier<br />

metal maintained continuity.<br />

Special Features:<br />

• Fast FLASH technology.<br />

• Sub-micron gates (0.45 micron N-channel, 0.5 micron P-channel).<br />

General Items:<br />

• Fabrication process: Selective oxidation CMOS process using twin-wells in a P<br />

substrate. No epi was present.<br />

• Process Implementation: Die layout was clean and efficient. Alignment/registration<br />

was good at all levels and no damage or contamination was found.<br />

• Final passivation: A layer of silicon-nitride over silicon-dioxide. Passivation<br />

extended into the scribe lane covering all metallization. A cutout was present in the<br />

passivation around the die perimeter in the scribe lane. This was probably employed<br />

to prevent cracks from radiating inward.<br />

• Metallization: Two levels of aluminum interconnect. A titanium-nitride (TiN) cap<br />

and barrier metal were employed with each metal level. Standard vias and contacts<br />

were employed (no plugs).<br />

1 <strong>The</strong>se items present possible quality or reliability concerns. <strong>The</strong>y should be discussed<br />

with the manufacturer to determine their possible impact on the intended application.


ANALYSIS RESULTS II (continued)<br />

• Metal patterning: Both layers were defined by dry-etch techniques. Definition was<br />

normal for both layers. Some neckdown of metal 2 lines was noted where they<br />

crossed over metal 1 lines. Metal lines were widened at vias and contacts.<br />

• Metal defects: No voiding or notching of the metals was found. No silicon nodules<br />

were found following the removal of the aluminum layers. No problems were<br />

noted.<br />

• Metal step coverage: Metal 2 aluminum thinned up to 100 percent at some via<br />

edges. Metal 1 aluminum also thinned up to 100 percent at some contact edges.<br />

Barrier metal maintained continuity. <strong>The</strong> excessive thinning appears to be due to the<br />

metal deposition method employed.<br />

• Vias and contacts: Metal 2 vias were overetched into the metal 1 cap; however, no<br />

problems are foreseen. No overetching of metal 1 contacts was noted.<br />

• Interlevel dielectric: <strong>The</strong> dielectric between the two metal levels consisted of two<br />

layers of silicon-dioxide with a spin-on-glass (SOG) employed between for<br />

planarization purposes. No problems were noted.<br />

• Pre-metal glass: <strong>The</strong> glass under metal 1 consisted of a thick reflow glass which<br />

was apparently reflowed prior to contact cuts only. This deposited glass was located<br />

over various densified oxides. No problems were found in any of the glass layers.<br />

• Polysilicon: Two layers of poly were used. Polycide (tungsten silicide on poly 2)<br />

formed all standard gates on the die. Poly 1 was used exclusively for floating gates<br />

in the array. No poly stringers or spurs were present. Definition was by a dry etch<br />

of good quality.<br />

• Isolation: Local oxide (LOCOS). No problems were present at the birdsbeak. A<br />

step was present in the field oxide indicating a twin-well process was used.<br />

- 6 -


ANALYSIS RESULTS II (continued)<br />

• Diffusions: Transistors were formed using an LDD process in which the oxide<br />

sidewall spacers were left in place. Implanted N+ and P+ sources/drains were<br />

employed. Definition was normal and no problems were present. Diffusions were<br />

not silicided.<br />

• Wells: Twin-wells in a P substrate. No problems were apparent.<br />

• Epi: No epi was used. No substrate defects were found.<br />

• Buried contacts: No buried contacts were used on this device.<br />

• Memory cells: <strong>The</strong> programmable array consisted of EEPROM cells (Fast FLASH<br />

technology). Metal 2 was used to form "piggyback" word and program lines.<br />

Metal 1 formed the bit lines and distributed GND. Poly 2 formed the word and<br />

program lines and poly 1 formed the floating gates. <strong>The</strong> interpoly dielectric<br />

consisted of ONO (oxide-nitride-oxide). Cell size was 5.2 x 6 microns and cell area<br />

was 31 microns 2 .<br />

- 7 -


PROCEDURE<br />

<strong>The</strong> devices were subjected to the following analysis procedures:<br />

External inspection<br />

X-ray<br />

Decapsulate<br />

Internal optical inspection<br />

Passivation removal and inspect metal 2<br />

Metal 2 removal and inspect barrier<br />

Delayer to metal 1 and inspect<br />

Aluminum 1 removal and inspect barrier<br />

Delayer to poly/substrate and inspect poly structures and die surface<br />

Die material analysis<br />

Die sectioning (90° for SEM) *<br />

Measure horizontal dimensions<br />

Measure vertical dimensions<br />

* Delineation of cross-sections is by silicon etch unless otherwise indicated.<br />

- 8 -


OVERALL QUALITY EVALUATION: Overall Rating: Normal/Poor<br />

DETAIL OF EVALUATION<br />

Package integrity N<br />

Die placement G<br />

Die attach quality N<br />

Wire spacing G<br />

Wirebond placement G<br />

Wirebond quality N<br />

Dicing quality G<br />

Die attach method Silver-epoxy<br />

Dicing method Sawn (full depth)<br />

Die surface integrity:<br />

Tool marks (absence) G<br />

Particles (absence) G<br />

Contamination (absence) G<br />

Process defects (absence) G<br />

General workmanship N<br />

Passivation integrity G<br />

Metal definition N<br />

Metal integrity P *<br />

Metal registration G<br />

Contact coverage G<br />

Contact registration G<br />

* Metal 2 and metal 1 aluminum thinning up to 100 percent.<br />

G = Good, P = Poor, N = Normal, NP = Normal/Poor<br />

- 9 -


TOP<br />

PACKAGE MARKINGS<br />

- 10 -<br />

BOTTOM (molded)<br />

(logo) XILINX® KOREA 23<br />

<strong>XC9536</strong><br />

VQ44ASJ9633<br />

A63042A 7C B(penciled)<br />

DIE MATERIAL ANALYSIS<br />

Final passivation: Silicon-nitride over silicon-dioxide.<br />

Metallization 2: Aluminum with a titanium-nitride cap and barrier metal.<br />

Interlevel dielectric: Two layers of silicon-dioxide with a spin-on glass.<br />

Metallization 1: Aluminum with a titanium-nitride cap and barrier metal.<br />

Intermediate glass: Reflow glass.<br />

Polycide: Tungsten on poly 2.


HORIZONTAL DIMENSIONS<br />

Die size: 3.4 x 5.6 mm (134 x 222 mils)<br />

Die area: 19.2 mm 2 (29,748 mils 2 )<br />

Min pad size: 0.11 x 0.11 mm (4.3 x 4.3 mils)<br />

Min pad window: 0.09 x 0.09 mm (3.7 x 3.7 mils)<br />

Min pad space: 8 microns<br />

Min metal 2 width: 0.8 micron<br />

Min metal 2 space: 1.0 micron<br />

Min metal 2 pitch (uncontacted): 1.9 micron<br />

Min metal 2 pitch (contacted): 2.6 microns<br />

Min via: 1.0 micron (round)<br />

Min via pitch: 2.0 microns<br />

Min metal 1 width: 0.55 micron<br />

Min metal 1 space: 0.9 micron<br />

Min metal 1 pitch (uncontacted): 1.6 micron<br />

Min metal 1 pitch (contacted): 2.5 microns<br />

Min contact: 1.0 micron<br />

Min contact pitch: 1.7 micron<br />

Min contact-to-gate: 0.6 micron<br />

Min poly 2 width: 0.45 micron<br />

Min poly 2 space: 0.85 micron<br />

Min poly 1 width: 0.65 micron<br />

Min gate length * (N-ch): 0.45 micron<br />

(P-ch): 0.5 micron<br />

Cell pitch: 5.2 x 6 microns<br />

Cell size: 31 microns 2<br />

* Physical gate length.<br />

- 11 -


VERTICAL DIMENSIONS<br />

Die thickness: 0.4 mm (16 mils)<br />

Layers:<br />

Passivation 2: 0.45 micron<br />

Passivation 1: 0.25 micron<br />

Metallization 2 - cap: 0.05 micron (approx.)<br />

- aluminum: 0.75 micron<br />

- barrier: 0.1 micron<br />

Interlevel dielectric: 0.65 - 1.9 micron<br />

Metallization 1 - cap: 0.07 micron<br />

- aluminum: 0.5 micron<br />

- barrier: 0.1 micron<br />

Pre-metal glass: 0.35 - 0.9 micron<br />

Polycide - silicide: 0.13 micron<br />

- poly 2: 0.1 micron<br />

Poly 1: 0.1 micron<br />

Local oxide: 0.5 micron<br />

N+ S/D: 0.17 micron<br />

P+ S/D: 0.2 micron<br />

N-well: 4.0 microns<br />

- 12 -


INDEX TO FIGURES<br />

PACKAGE PHOTOGRAPH AND X-RAY Figure 1<br />

DIE LAYOUT AND IDENTIFICATION Figures 2 - 5<br />

PHYSICAL DIE STRUCTURES Figures 6 - 37<br />

CROSS SECTION DRAWING Figure 30<br />

MEMORY CELL Figures 31 - 37


<strong>Xilinx</strong> <strong>XC9536</strong><br />

PIN 1<br />

Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation<br />

Figure 1. Package photograph and x-ray view of the <strong>Xilinx</strong> <strong>XC9536</strong>. Mag. 6x.


<strong>Xilinx</strong> <strong>XC9536</strong><br />

Figure 2. Whole die photograph of the <strong>Xilinx</strong> <strong>XC9536</strong>. Mag. 40x.<br />

Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation


Figure 3. Die identification markings. Mag. 400x.<br />

<strong>Xilinx</strong> <strong>XC9536</strong><br />

Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation


<strong>Xilinx</strong> <strong>XC9536</strong><br />

Mag. 400x<br />

Mag. 800x<br />

ISOLATED VIAS<br />

Figure 4. Optical views illustrating design features.<br />

Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation<br />

SLOTS


<strong>Xilinx</strong> <strong>XC9536</strong><br />

Figure 5. Optical views of die corners. Mag. 160x.<br />

Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation<br />

DAMAGED DURING<br />

REMOVAL


<strong>Xilinx</strong> <strong>XC9536</strong><br />

METAL 2<br />

METAL 2<br />

METAL 1<br />

CUTOUT<br />

123<br />

SUBSTRATE<br />

Mag. 2600x<br />

PASSIVATION 2<br />

PASSIVATION 1<br />

Mag. 10,300x<br />

Figure 6. SEM section views of the edge seal structure.<br />

P+<br />

EDGE OF DIE<br />

Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation


<strong>Xilinx</strong> <strong>XC9536</strong><br />

PAD WINDOW<br />

METAL 2 PAD<br />

METAL 1<br />

PASSIVATION 2<br />

METAL 2 BOND PAD<br />

METAL 1<br />

PASSIVATION 1<br />

Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation<br />

Au BOND<br />

Mag. 320x<br />

Mag. 2200x<br />

Mag. 7700x<br />

Figure 7. Topological and section views of the bond pad layout and structure.


<strong>Xilinx</strong> <strong>XC9536</strong><br />

LOCAL OXIDE<br />

POLY 2 GATE<br />

METAL 1<br />

METAL 2<br />

METAL 2<br />

Mag. 7900x<br />

PASSIVATION 2<br />

ILD<br />

PASSIVATION 1<br />

Mag. 9600x<br />

PASSIVATION 2<br />

SOG<br />

METAL 1<br />

N+ S/D P+<br />

Figure 8. SEM section views illustrating general device structure.<br />

Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation<br />

POLY 2 GATES<br />

N+ S/D


<strong>Xilinx</strong> <strong>XC9536</strong><br />

SOG<br />

PASSIVATION 2<br />

ILD<br />

METAL 1<br />

PASSIVATION 1<br />

LOCAL OXIDE<br />

METAL 1<br />

Mag. 7600x<br />

PASSIVATION 2<br />

METAL 2<br />

POLY 2<br />

Mag. 9000x<br />

METAL 2<br />

POLY 2<br />

SOG<br />

Figure 9. Glass etch section views illustrating general device structure.<br />

Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation


<strong>Xilinx</strong> <strong>XC9536</strong><br />

PASSIVATION 2<br />

PASSIVATION 1<br />

METAL 2<br />

TiN CAP<br />

PASSIVATION 2<br />

METAL 2<br />

ILD<br />

METAL 1<br />

PRE-METAL DIELECTRIC<br />

ILD<br />

Ti ADHESION LAYER<br />

POLY 2<br />

PASSIVATION 2<br />

PASSIVATION 1<br />

ALUMINUM 2<br />

TiN BARRIER<br />

Figure 10. SEM section views of metal 2 line profiles.<br />

Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation<br />

Mag. 15,500x<br />

Mag. 26,250x<br />

Mag. 34,000x


<strong>Xilinx</strong> <strong>XC9536</strong><br />

METAL 2 VIAS<br />

Figure 11. Topological SEM views of metal 2 patterning. Mag. 5500x, 0°.<br />

Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation


METAL 2<br />

METAL 2<br />

NECKDOWN<br />

VIA<br />

METAL 2<br />

Figure 12. Topological SEM views of metal 2 design rule features. Mag. 13,000x, 0°.<br />

VIAS<br />

VIAS<br />

<strong>Xilinx</strong> <strong>XC9536</strong><br />

Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation


<strong>Xilinx</strong> <strong>XC9536</strong><br />

BARRIER<br />

Mag. 6000x<br />

Mag. 25,000x<br />

ALUMINUM 2<br />

Figure 13. SEM views of general metal 2 integrity. 60°.<br />

Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation


<strong>Xilinx</strong> <strong>XC9536</strong><br />

TiN BARRIER<br />

VIAS<br />

Mag. 15,000x, 0°<br />

Mag. 31,000x, 55°<br />

Figure 14. SEM views of metal 2 barrier.<br />

Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation<br />

TiN BARRIER


PASSIVATION 1<br />

METAL 2<br />

PASSIVATION 2 PASSIVATION 1<br />

METAL 2<br />

METAL 1<br />

PRE-METAL DIELECTRIC<br />

Mag. 14,000x<br />

100% THINNING<br />

METAL 1<br />

Mag. 30,000x<br />

VOID<br />

ILD<br />

METAL 2<br />

Figure 15. SEM section views of metal 2-to-metal 1 vias.<br />

METAL 2<br />

METAL 1<br />

PASSIVATION 1<br />

PRE-METAL DIELECTRIC<br />

Mag. 14,600x<br />

100% THINNING<br />

METAL 1<br />

VOID<br />

Mag. 30,000x<br />

PASSIVATION 2<br />

ILD<br />

ILD<br />

<strong>Xilinx</strong> <strong>XC9536</strong><br />

Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation


<strong>Xilinx</strong> <strong>XC9536</strong><br />

TiN CAP<br />

ALUMINUM 1<br />

TiN BARRIER<br />

PASSIVATION 2<br />

METAL 1<br />

PRE-METAL DIELECTRIC<br />

LOCAL OXIDE<br />

Mag. 18,300x<br />

SOG<br />

Mag. 37,300x<br />

SOG<br />

Figure 16. SEM section views of metal 1 line profiles.<br />

ILD<br />

Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation


<strong>Xilinx</strong> <strong>XC9536</strong><br />

Mag. 4000x<br />

Mag. 6000x<br />

CONTACTS<br />

METAL 1<br />

Figure 17. Topological SEM views of metal 1 patterning. 0°.<br />

Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation


<strong>Xilinx</strong> <strong>XC9536</strong><br />

METAL 1<br />

CONTACT<br />

CONTACTS<br />

Figure 18. Topological SEM views of metal 1 design rule features. 0°.<br />

Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation<br />

Mag. 26,000x<br />

Mag. 13,000x<br />

Mag. 13,000x


<strong>Xilinx</strong> <strong>XC9536</strong><br />

TiN CAP<br />

ALUMINUM 1<br />

TiN BARRIER<br />

Figure 19. SEM views of general metal 1 integrity. 55°.<br />

Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation<br />

Mag. 5500x<br />

Mag. 9000x<br />

Mag. 27,000x


<strong>Xilinx</strong> <strong>XC9536</strong><br />

CONTACTS<br />

TiN BARRIER<br />

Mag. 26,000x, 0°<br />

Mag. 20,000x, 55°<br />

TiN BARRIER<br />

Figure 20. SEM views of metal 1 barrier.<br />

Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation


<strong>Xilinx</strong> <strong>XC9536</strong><br />

PRE-METAL<br />

DIELECTRIC<br />

POLY 2<br />

GATE<br />

N+ S/D<br />

METAL 1<br />

N+ S/D<br />

SOG<br />

SOG<br />

ILD<br />

ILD<br />

METAL 1<br />

100% THINNING<br />

METAL 1<br />

POLY 2<br />

LOCAL OXIDE<br />

100% THINNING<br />

POLY 2<br />

LOCAL OXIDE<br />

Figure 21. SEM section views of metal 1 contacts.<br />

Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation<br />

PRE-METAL<br />

DIELECTRIC<br />

Mag. 19,500x<br />

Mag. 27,400x<br />

Mag. 29,300x


POLY 2<br />

METAL 1<br />

ILD<br />

METAL 1<br />

LOCAL OXIDE<br />

Mag. 20,500x<br />

SOG<br />

ILD<br />

Mag. 23,000x<br />

POLY 2<br />

SOG<br />

LOCAL OXIDE<br />

N+ S/D N+ S/D<br />

POLY 2<br />

Figure 22. SEM section views illustrating metal 1 contact spacings.<br />

ILD<br />

SOG<br />

METAL 1<br />

P+<br />

Mag. 23,300x<br />

ILD<br />

METAL 1<br />

N+<br />

Mag. 20,500x<br />

SOG<br />

<strong>Xilinx</strong> <strong>XC9536</strong><br />

Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation


<strong>Xilinx</strong> <strong>XC9536</strong><br />

POLY 2<br />

GATES<br />

POLY 2 GATES<br />

Figure 23. Topological SEM views of poly patterning. Mag. 4000x, 0°.<br />

Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation


<strong>Xilinx</strong> <strong>XC9536</strong><br />

CONTACT<br />

POLY 2<br />

POLY 2<br />

CONTACT<br />

POLY 2<br />

CONTACT<br />

Figure 24. Topological SEM views of poly design rule features.<br />

Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation<br />

Mag. 13,000x<br />

Mag. 26,000x<br />

Mag. 26,000x


<strong>Xilinx</strong> <strong>XC9536</strong><br />

POLY 2 GATE<br />

DIFFUSION<br />

POLY 2 GATE<br />

Figure 25. Perspective SEM views of poly coverage. 55°.<br />

Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation<br />

DIFFUSION<br />

Mag. 5000x<br />

Mag. 9000x<br />

Mag. 25,000x


<strong>Xilinx</strong> <strong>XC9536</strong><br />

PASSIVATION 2<br />

METAL 1<br />

N+ S/D<br />

N+ S/D<br />

ILD<br />

METAL 1<br />

N+ S/D<br />

METAL 1<br />

ILD<br />

POLY 2 GATES<br />

POLY 2 GATE<br />

POLY 2 GATE<br />

PRE-METAL DIELECTRIC<br />

GATE OXIDE<br />

SOG<br />

Figure 26. SEM section views of N-channel transistors.<br />

Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation<br />

Mag. 14,600x<br />

Mag. 17,700x<br />

Mag. 31,500x


<strong>Xilinx</strong> <strong>XC9536</strong><br />

P+ S/D<br />

METAL 1<br />

POLY 2 GATE PRE-METAL<br />

DIELECTRIC<br />

P+ S/D<br />

SOG<br />

POLY 2 GATE<br />

GATE OXIDE<br />

W SILICIDE<br />

POLY 2<br />

GATE OXIDE<br />

Figure 27. SEM section views of P-channel transistors.<br />

Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation<br />

PRE-METAL<br />

DIELECTRIC<br />

P+ S/D<br />

SIDEWALL<br />

SPACER<br />

Mag. 22,200x<br />

Mag. 42,000x<br />

Mag. 61,000x


<strong>Xilinx</strong> <strong>XC9536</strong><br />

PRE-METAL<br />

DIELECTRIC<br />

METAL 1<br />

METAL 1<br />

STEP<br />

METAL 2<br />

SOG<br />

POLY 2 GATE<br />

N+<br />

N+ S/D<br />

N+ S/D<br />

Figure 28. SEM section views of the I/O structure.<br />

Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation<br />

POLY 2<br />

PRE-METAL<br />

DIELECTRIC<br />

Mag. 7500x<br />

Mag. 23,200x<br />

Mag. 30,000x


GATE OXIDE<br />

LOCAL OXIDE<br />

POLY 2<br />

LOCAL OXIDE<br />

Mag. 36,400x<br />

Mag. 41,200x<br />

POLY 2<br />

GATE OXIDE<br />

Figure 29. SEM section views of local oxide and well structure.<br />

P+<br />

STEP<br />

METAL 1<br />

Mag. 25,300x<br />

P SUBSTRATE<br />

Mag. 800x<br />

N-WELL<br />

N+<br />

<strong>Xilinx</strong> <strong>XC9536</strong><br />

Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation


PASSIVATION 2<br />

,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,<br />

INTERLEVEL DIELECTRIC<br />

,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,<br />

,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,<br />

,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,<br />

,,,,,,,,,,<br />

,,,,,,,,,,<br />

P-WELL<br />

PASSIVATION 1<br />

SILICDE<br />

N+ S/D<br />

PRE-METAL GLASS<br />

LOCAL OXIDE<br />

P SUBSTRATE<br />

METAL 2<br />

METAL 1<br />

N-WELL<br />

Orange = Nitride, Blue = Metal, Yellow = Oxide, Green = Poly,<br />

Red = Diffusion, and Gray = Substrate<br />

Figure 30. Color cross section drawing illustrating device structure.<br />

,,,,,,,,,,,,,<br />

,,,,,,,,,,,,,<br />

,,,,,,,,,,,,,<br />

P+ S/D<br />

POLY 2<br />

SOG<br />

<strong>Xilinx</strong> <strong>XC9536</strong><br />

Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation


<strong>Xilinx</strong> <strong>XC9536</strong><br />

“PIGGYBACK”<br />

PROGRAM<br />

LINES<br />

PROGRAM<br />

LINES<br />

“PIGGYBACK”<br />

PROGRAM LINES<br />

“PIGGYBACK”<br />

WORD LINES<br />

“PIGGYBACK”<br />

WORD LINES<br />

WORD<br />

LINES<br />

Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation<br />

metal 2<br />

metal 1<br />

poly 2<br />

Figure 31. Topological SEM views of the EEPROM array illustrating “piggyback” word<br />

line connections. Mag. 5000x, 0°.


<strong>Xilinx</strong> <strong>XC9536</strong><br />

“PIGGYBACK”<br />

LINES<br />

WORD<br />

LINES<br />

BIT LINES<br />

“PIGGYBACK”<br />

CONTACTS<br />

PROGRAM<br />

LINES<br />

Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation<br />

metal 2<br />

metal 1<br />

poly 2<br />

Figure 32. Perspective SEM views of the EEPROM array. Mag. 4000x, 55°.


<strong>Xilinx</strong> <strong>XC9536</strong><br />

POLY 1<br />

POLY 2 PROGRAM<br />

POLY 2 PROGRAM<br />

POLY 1<br />

FLOATING GATE<br />

Figure 33. SEM detail views of EEPROM cells. 55°.<br />

Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation<br />

Mag. 10,000x<br />

Mag. 24,000x<br />

Mag. 24,000x


“PIGGYBACK” LINES<br />

metal 2<br />

GND<br />

BIT<br />

metal 1<br />

poly<br />

Figure 34. Topological SEM views of EEPROM cells and schematic. Mag. 5000x, 0°.<br />

GND<br />

Q2 Q1<br />

BIT<br />

WORD<br />

PGM<br />

SELECT<br />

GATE<br />

BIT<br />

Q1<br />

Q2<br />

<strong>Xilinx</strong> <strong>XC9536</strong><br />

Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation


BIT CONTACT<br />

N+ S/D<br />

POLY 2 SELECT<br />

GATE<br />

“PIGGYBACK” LINES<br />

10,500x<br />

PRE-METAL<br />

DIELECTRIC<br />

Mag. 22,500x<br />

POLY 2<br />

POLY 1<br />

POLY 1<br />

FLOATING GATE<br />

POLY 2<br />

PROGRAM<br />

N+ S/D<br />

N+ S/D<br />

POLY 2<br />

GATE OXIDE<br />

Mag. 47,000x<br />

Mag. 21,000x<br />

Figure 35. SEM section views of an EEPROM cell (perpendicular to word line).<br />

METAL 1 BIT<br />

CONTACT<br />

SOG<br />

POLY 2 SELECT<br />

GATE<br />

N+ S/D<br />

SOG<br />

<strong>Xilinx</strong> <strong>XC9536</strong><br />

Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation


<strong>Xilinx</strong> <strong>XC9536</strong><br />

POLY 1<br />

FLOATING GATE<br />

N+ S/D<br />

POLY 2<br />

GATE OXIDE<br />

W SILICIDE<br />

POLY 2<br />

POLY 1<br />

W SILICIDE<br />

POLY 2<br />

POLY 1<br />

NITRIDE<br />

NITRIDE<br />

Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation<br />

NITRIDE<br />

Mag. 59,000x<br />

glass etch,<br />

Mag. 59,000x<br />

glass etch,<br />

Mag. 117,500x<br />

Figure 36. Detail views of EEPROM floating gate structure (perpendicular to word lines).


<strong>Xilinx</strong> <strong>XC9536</strong><br />

LOCAL OXIDE<br />

POLY 2<br />

LOCAL OXIDE<br />

LOCAL OXIDE<br />

POLY 2<br />

POLY 1<br />

METAL 2<br />

METAL 1<br />

PASSIVATION 2<br />

PRE-METAL<br />

DIELECTRIC<br />

POLY 1 FLOATING<br />

GATE<br />

POLY 2<br />

PROGRAM<br />

LINE<br />

POLY 1<br />

ONO<br />

Figure 37. SEM section views of EEPROM cells (parallel to word line).<br />

Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation<br />

Mag. 13,000x<br />

Mag. 26,000x<br />

Mag. 52,000x

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!