14.08.2013 Views

Docteur de l'université Automatic Segmentation and Shape Analysis ...

Docteur de l'université Automatic Segmentation and Shape Analysis ...

Docteur de l'université Automatic Segmentation and Shape Analysis ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chapter 5 Quantitative shape analysis of hippocampus in AD 129<br />

Sensitivity<br />

0.84 0.86 0.88 0.90<br />

● ●<br />

●<br />

● ●<br />

● ● ●<br />

●<br />

●<br />

●<br />

●●<br />

●<br />

●<br />

●<br />

●<br />

● ●<br />

●<br />

●● ●<br />

●<br />

● ●<br />

● ●<br />

● ● ● ●●<br />

●<br />

●<br />

●<br />

●<br />

●<br />

● ●<br />

●<br />

●<br />

●<br />

● ●<br />

●<br />

●<br />

●<br />

●<br />

● ●<br />

●<br />

●<br />

●<br />

●<br />

●<br />

●<br />

●<br />

●●<br />

● ●<br />

● ● ●●<br />

● ●<br />

● ●<br />

1e−04 1e−03 1e−02 1e−01 1e+00<br />

Threshold α<br />

(a) Testing set specificity, LR, MR<br />

Sensitivity<br />

0.80 0.85 0.90<br />

●<br />

●<br />

●<br />

●<br />

● ●<br />

●<br />

● ● ●<br />

●<br />

●<br />

●<br />

●●<br />

● ●●●<br />

●<br />

●●<br />

●<br />

●<br />

● ●<br />

●<br />

●<br />

●●<br />

● ●<br />

● ●<br />

●<br />

●<br />

●<br />

● ●<br />

●<br />

● ●<br />

●<br />

● ●<br />

● ●●<br />

●<br />

●<br />

●●●<br />

●<br />

● ●<br />

●<br />

●<br />

●<br />

●<br />

● ●<br />

●●<br />

1e−04 1e−03 1e−02 1e−01 1e+00<br />

Threshold α<br />

(c) Testing set specificity, LS, MR<br />

Sensitivity<br />

0.65 0.70 0.75 0.80<br />

●<br />

●<br />

● ●<br />

● ● ●<br />

●<br />

●<br />

●<br />

● ● ●<br />

●● ● ●●<br />

●<br />

● ●<br />

● ●<br />

● ● ●<br />

●<br />

●<br />

●<br />

●●●<br />

● ●<br />

●<br />

●<br />

●<br />

●<br />

●<br />

●<br />

● ●<br />

●<br />

●<br />

●●<br />

●●<br />

● ●<br />

● ●<br />

● ● ●<br />

●<br />

● ● ● ●<br />

● ●<br />

●●<br />

●<br />

●●<br />

●<br />

1e−04 1e−03 1e−02 1e−01 1e+00<br />

Threshold α<br />

(b) Testing set specificity, LR, MS<br />

Sensitivity<br />

0.65 0.75 0.85<br />

●<br />

●<br />

● ●● ●<br />

●<br />

● ● ● ●<br />

● ● ● ●<br />

●<br />

● ●<br />

●●<br />

●<br />

●● ●<br />

●<br />

●<br />

●●<br />

●<br />

●<br />

●<br />

●<br />

●<br />

●<br />

●<br />

●<br />

●<br />

●<br />

●<br />

●<br />

●● ●<br />

●<br />

●●●<br />

●<br />

●●<br />

● ●●<br />

●<br />

● ●<br />

●<br />

●<br />

●<br />

●●<br />

●<br />

●<br />

●<br />

●<br />

●<br />

●●<br />

●<br />

1e−04 1e−03 1e−02 1e−01 1e+00<br />

Threshold α<br />

(d) Testing set specificity, LS, MS<br />

Figure 5.10: The specificity of the disease classification using bagged support<br />

vector machines (SVMs) with varying thresholds in the l<strong>and</strong>mark selection on<br />

a separated testing set. Black circles: shape features from the Statistical <strong>Shape</strong><br />

Mo<strong>de</strong>l (SSM) only; red circles: shape features with additional volume features.<br />

Restricting the analysis to the subregions affected by the disease increased the<br />

discrimination ability of the SSM approach by capturing localized differences be-<br />

tween the subpopulations. Whole surface SSMs are able to <strong>de</strong>scribe the global<br />

shape or size-<strong>and</strong>-shape of the biological object, but are not sensitive to the <strong>de</strong>-<br />

formations limited to specific areas on the object surface. Localizing the PCA to<br />

subregions with significant shape difference (LS) on the surface produced overall<br />

better discrimination between NC <strong>and</strong> AD than using all the points. When TIV<br />

normalized volume was ad<strong>de</strong>d as additional features to the shape features, the<br />

best classification results were obtained using the SSM built using MR on the<br />

hippocampal subregions selected by LS.<br />

In particular, using LS in the localization step gave more informative surface masks<br />

than LR when <strong>de</strong>scribing the atrophy pattern in the disease classification. Subre-<br />

gional masks <strong>de</strong>rived from rigid-body aligned localization mo<strong>de</strong>l LR ten<strong>de</strong>d to be<br />

predominantly representing changes in global scale due to the volume reduction.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!