14.08.2013 Views

Docteur de l'université Automatic Segmentation and Shape Analysis ...

Docteur de l'université Automatic Segmentation and Shape Analysis ...

Docteur de l'université Automatic Segmentation and Shape Analysis ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chapter 5 Quantitative shape analysis of hippocampus in AD 125<br />

Accuracy<br />

Accuracy<br />

0.84 0.85 0.86 0.87<br />

●<br />

● ●<br />

●<br />

● ●<br />

● ●<br />

●<br />

●<br />

●<br />

● ● ●<br />

●<br />

● ●<br />

● ●<br />

●<br />

●<br />

● ● ●<br />

●<br />

● ●<br />

● ●●<br />

●● ● ●<br />

● ● ●<br />

● ● ●<br />

●●<br />

●<br />

●<br />

●<br />

●● ●<br />

●<br />

●<br />

●<br />

●<br />

●<br />

● ●● ● ● ●<br />

●<br />

●<br />

● ●<br />

●<br />

● ●<br />

● ●●<br />

● ●<br />

1e−04 1e−03 1e−02 1e−01 1e+00<br />

Threshold α<br />

(a) Testing set accuracy, LR, MR<br />

0.70 0.75 0.80 0.85<br />

● ●●●<br />

●●<br />

● ●●<br />

●<br />

● ●<br />

● ●<br />

● ●<br />

●●●<br />

●<br />

●<br />

●<br />

●●<br />

●<br />

●●<br />

●●●<br />

●●<br />

●<br />

● ●● ●<br />

●<br />

●<br />

●<br />

● ●<br />

● ● ● ● ●<br />

●<br />

● ● ●<br />

●<br />

●<br />

●●<br />

●<br />

● ●●<br />

●<br />

●<br />

1e−04 1e−03 1e−02 1e−01 1e+00<br />

Threshold α<br />

(c) Testing set accuracy, LS, MR<br />

Accuracy<br />

Accuracy<br />

0.70 0.74 0.78 0.82<br />

●<br />

● ● ●<br />

●<br />

●<br />

● ●<br />

●●<br />

●<br />

●<br />

● ●●<br />

●<br />

●<br />

●<br />

●<br />

●●<br />

● ● ● ● ●<br />

● ● ●<br />

● ●<br />

● ● ●<br />

●<br />

●<br />

● ●<br />

●<br />

●●<br />

●●<br />

●●<br />

●<br />

● ●<br />

● ●<br />

● ●●<br />

● ●<br />

●<br />

●<br />

●<br />

●●<br />

●<br />

● ●<br />

●●<br />

1e−04 1e−03 1e−02 1e−01 1e+00<br />

Threshold α<br />

(b) Testing set accuracy, LR, MS<br />

0.70 0.75 0.80 0.85<br />

●<br />

●<br />

●<br />

●<br />

● ●<br />

● ●<br />

●<br />

●<br />

●<br />

●<br />

●● ●<br />

●<br />

●<br />

●<br />

●<br />

●<br />

●●●●<br />

●<br />

●<br />

● ●<br />

●●●<br />

●<br />

● ● ●<br />

●●<br />

● ●●<br />

●●<br />

● ●<br />

● ●<br />

●<br />

●●<br />

●<br />

●<br />

●●<br />

● ●●<br />

● ●<br />

●<br />

● ●●<br />

●<br />

●<br />

1e−04 1e−03 1e−02 1e−01 1e+00<br />

Threshold α<br />

(d) Testing set accuracy, LS, MS<br />

Figure 5.6: The accuracy of the disease classification using bagged support<br />

vector machines (SVMs) with varying thresholds in the l<strong>and</strong>mark selection on<br />

a separated testing set. Black circles: shape features from the Statistical <strong>Shape</strong><br />

Mo<strong>de</strong>l (SSM) only; red circles: shape features with additional volume features.<br />

both right <strong>and</strong> left hippocampus (visualization in Figure 5.12). The shape com-<br />

ponents extracted from subregions with significant shape differences indicate a<br />

better representation of the effect of the disease on the shape of the hippocampus.<br />

The mean difference between the NC <strong>and</strong> AD groups in the training set is shown<br />

in Figs. 5.14 <strong>and</strong> 5.15.<br />

5.6 Discussion<br />

5.6.1 <strong>Shape</strong> mo<strong>de</strong>l <strong>and</strong> correspon<strong>de</strong>nces<br />

In our current setting, the correspon<strong>de</strong>nce over the training set is MDL optimized,<br />

<strong>and</strong> propagated to the testing set via closest point. This is an economical solution<br />

while suboptimal to the optimization of MDL over the testing set. In practice,<br />

however, we found that the classification accuracy was not lowered when using the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!