14.08.2013 Views

Docteur de l'université Automatic Segmentation and Shape Analysis ...

Docteur de l'université Automatic Segmentation and Shape Analysis ...

Docteur de l'université Automatic Segmentation and Shape Analysis ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter 5 Quantitative shape analysis of hippocampus in AD 113<br />

5.2 <strong>Shape</strong> analysis using SSM<br />

The SSM for hippocampus is built upon a training set of hippocampal surfaces, in<br />

which the k l<strong>and</strong>marks on the surface of hippocampus are reparameterized to avoid<br />

the false variation induced by incorrect correspon<strong>de</strong>nces. This correspon<strong>de</strong>nce<br />

problem can be solved by a groupwise optimization <strong>and</strong> fluid regularization on the<br />

shape image (Davies et al., 2008b) as <strong>de</strong>scribed in the §4.1.<br />

Once the correspon<strong>de</strong>nce is established, the surfaces can be aligned by using Pro-<br />

crustes analysis, either through rigid-body or similarity transformations. The vol-<br />

ume information is preserved after rigid body transformations. Procrustes analysis<br />

aligns the training data via rigid-body transformations to the size-<strong>and</strong>-shape space<br />

SΣ k 3 in which the variation among the data would be driven by the change in both<br />

the size <strong>and</strong> the shape of hippocampus. If the training samples are aligned via<br />

isotropic similarity transformations, the surfaces will be rescaled to normalize the<br />

hippocampal volume. Thus we have the training set in the shape space Σ k 3. As<br />

shape is <strong>de</strong>fined as the remaining information ‘when the differences which can<br />

be attributed to translations, rotations, <strong>and</strong> dilations have been quotiented out’<br />

(Kendall, 1984), the normalization of the volume by similarity transform enables<br />

the SSM to be more specific to the change in shape rather than incorporating<br />

variations in the sizes of hippocampi. The SSMs used are built on both rigid-body<br />

<strong>and</strong> similarity aligned surfaces.<br />

For a set of hippocampal l<strong>and</strong>marks {X1, X2, · · · , Xn} consisting of n samples<br />

with established correspon<strong>de</strong>nce, each sample is represented by the coordinates of<br />

its k l<strong>and</strong>marks concatenated as a 3k-vector<br />

Xi = (<br />

x 1 i , y 1 i , z 1 i , x 2 i , y 2 i , z 2 i , · · · , x k i , y k i , z k ) T<br />

i<br />

∈ R 3k , (5.1)<br />

where p s i = (x s i , y s i , z s i ) T ∈ Xi is the position of the s-th sampled l<strong>and</strong>mark point on<br />

the Xi. If the surfaces in {Xi, i = 1, · · · , n} are aligned using Procrustes analysis,<br />

either rigidly or via isotropic similarity transformations, a PCA can be performed

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!