14.08.2013 Views

Docteur de l'université Automatic Segmentation and Shape Analysis ...

Docteur de l'université Automatic Segmentation and Shape Analysis ...

Docteur de l'université Automatic Segmentation and Shape Analysis ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter 4 Statistical shape mo<strong>de</strong>l of Hippocampus 97<br />

4.3 Experimental results<br />

In the experiments, we first built SSMs for hippocampus based on the semi-<br />

automated segmentations from the ADNI database. The compactness, specificity<br />

<strong>and</strong> generalization ability of the result shape mo<strong>de</strong>ls were evaluated. Then we<br />

tested the performance of the EM-ICP based mo<strong>de</strong>l extrapolation method we<br />

proposed. We compared the performance of the symmetric <strong>and</strong> asymmetric esti-<br />

mation both with <strong>and</strong> without regularization. The reconstruction error <strong>and</strong> the<br />

accuracy of the parameter estimation are evaluated.<br />

4.3.1 SSM Building<br />

The hippocampal volumes used to build the SSMs were segmented semi-automatically<br />

by SNT provi<strong>de</strong>d by ADNI (see §3.4.2.1). The SSMs for right <strong>and</strong> left hippocampi<br />

were built on a training subset consisting of 60 AD subjects with average age<br />

75.2(6.7) years old <strong>and</strong> 60 NC subjects with average age 77.0(4.8) years old.<br />

The correspon<strong>de</strong>nces of 4098 sampled l<strong>and</strong>marks in the SSMs were established<br />

by groupwise optimization <strong>de</strong>scribed in the §4.1.<br />

Examples of first 3 principal components of shape variation in left hippocampus<br />

is shown in Figure 4.11. The results of optimized SSMs are evaluated in terms<br />

of their compactness, specificity, <strong>and</strong> generalization ability. The compactness of<br />

the optimized SSM <strong>and</strong> the initial mo<strong>de</strong>l is compared in Figure 4.8. For the left<br />

hippocampus, the 90% of the total variance is explained by the first 12 mo<strong>de</strong>s, 95%<br />

by the first 20 mo<strong>de</strong>s, <strong>and</strong> 98% by the first 36 mo<strong>de</strong>s in the optimized mo<strong>de</strong>l. For<br />

the right hippocampus, the 90% of the total variance is explained by the first 13<br />

mo<strong>de</strong>s, 95% by the first 20 mo<strong>de</strong>s, <strong>and</strong> 98% by the first 37 mo<strong>de</strong>s in the optimized<br />

mo<strong>de</strong>l.<br />

In the process of optimization, the information theoretic MDL is the object func-<br />

tion to be minimized. As the MDL of the mo<strong>de</strong>l <strong>de</strong>creases, the specificity <strong>and</strong> the<br />

generalization ability of the mo<strong>de</strong>l improves as shown in Figures 4.9 <strong>and</strong> 4.10.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!