14.08.2013 Views

Docteur de l'université Automatic Segmentation and Shape Analysis ...

Docteur de l'université Automatic Segmentation and Shape Analysis ...

Docteur de l'université Automatic Segmentation and Shape Analysis ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter 4 Statistical shape mo<strong>de</strong>l of Hippocampus 83<br />

(a) reparameterization ˜γ<br />

(b) reparameterization ψ = g −1 ◦ ˜γ ◦ g<br />

Figure 4.6: Reparameterization on the spherical parameterization <strong>and</strong> on the<br />

shape image. Left: the reparameterization ˜γ on the sphere; right: the reparameterization<br />

ψ = g −1 ◦ ˜γ ◦ g on the shape image, which is equivalent to a<br />

<strong>de</strong>formation on a 2D image. Image credit: Davies et al. (2008a).<br />

with the <strong>de</strong>formation<br />

4.1.3.2 MDL cost function <strong>and</strong> its gradient<br />

ψ(x) = x − u(x). (4.27)<br />

The original MDL cost function for optimizing correspon<strong>de</strong>nces was proposed by<br />

Davies et al. (2002, 2003), which was simplified by Thodberg (2003). With each<br />

shape surface in the collection {Xi, i = 1, · · · , n} sampled by octahedron <strong>and</strong><br />

mapped to 2D images, the mean ¯ S <strong>and</strong> the covariance matrix Σ for the shape<br />

sample can be computed<br />

Σij =<br />

1<br />

(2N + 1) 2<br />

2N+1<br />

∑<br />

ı=1<br />

2N+1<br />

∑<br />

j=1<br />

¯S(x) = 1<br />

n<br />

The MDL cost function is <strong>de</strong>fined as<br />

LMDL = ∑<br />

n∑<br />

Si(x), (4.28)<br />

i=1<br />

(<br />

Si(xı,j) − ¯ S(xı,j) )<br />

· (<br />

Sj(xı,j) − ¯ S(xı,j) )<br />

. (4.29)<br />

λm≥λc<br />

(<br />

1 + log λm<br />

)<br />

+ ∑<br />

λc<br />

λm

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!