napus, Theor. Appl. Genet. 91 (1995) 236–241. [13] D.J. Bing, R.K. Downey, G.F.W. Rakow, Hybridizations among Brassica napus, B. rapa and B. j uncea and t heir t wo w eedy relatives B.nigra and Sinapis ar vensis un<strong>de</strong>r op en pollination conditions in the field, Plant Breeding 115 (1996) 470-473. [14] X .L. S ong, C .H. Huangfu, S . Qiang, G ene f low f rom t ransgenic glufosinate- or glyphosate-tolerant oilseed rape to wild rape, J. Plant Ecol. 31 (2007) 729-737. [15] K. Di, C.N. Stewart J r, W. Wei, B.C. Shen, Z.X; Tang, K.P. Ma, Fitness an d m aternal effects i n h ybrids f ormed b etween t ransgenic o ilseed r ape ( Brassica nap us L.) and w ild brown mustard [B. juncea (L.) Czern et Coss.] in the field, Pest Manag Sci. 65 (2009) 753– 760. [16] W. Wei, H. Darmency, Gene flow hampered by low seed size of hybrids between oilseed rape and five wild relatives, Seed Sci. Res. 18 (2008) 115–123. [17] X. Song, Z. Wang, J. Zuo, C. Huangfu, S. Qiang, Potential gene flow of two herbici<strong>de</strong>- tolerant transgenes from oilseed rape to wild B. juncea var. gracilis, Theor. Appl. Genet. 120 (2010) 1501-1510. [18] M. Issaka Magha, P. Guerche, M. Bergeon, M. Renard, Characterization of a spontaneous rapeseed mutant tolerant to sulfonylurea and imidazolinone herbici<strong>de</strong>s, Plant Breeding 111 (1993) 132-141. [19] F. Akiner<strong>de</strong>n, Determination of the ploidy level of pure and mixed plant populations of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) by flow cytometry, Plant Breeding 107 (1991) 333-337. [20] T.M. P almer, M . Z immerman, P ollen c ompetition a nd s porophyte fitness i n Brassica campestris: does intense pollen competition result in individuals with better pollen, Oikos 69 (1994) 80-86. [21] C.J. Schelfhout, R. Snowdon, W.A. Cowling, J.M. Wroth, Tracing B-genome chromatin in Brassica napus x B. juncea interspecific progeny, Genome 49 (2006) 1490-1497. [22] X.L. Song, K. Munns, S. Qiang, R. Blackshaw, R. Sharma, Detection and quantification of 5 e nolpyruvylshikimate-3-phosphate s ynthase ( cp4 e psps) upon Brassica napus × Brassica j uncea outcrossing us ing r eal-time P CR, E ur. F ood. R es. Technol. 228 (2009) 939–944. [23] R.C. Yang, M.R. Thiagarajah, V.K. Bansal, G.R. Stringam, M.H. Rahman, Detecting and estimating segregation d istortion and linkage between glufosinate tolerance and blackleg resistance in Brassica napus L, Euphytica 148 (2006) 217–225. [24] L .G. C ampbel, A .A. S now, P .M. Sweeney, W hen di vergent l ife histories h ybridize: 75
insight into adaptive life-history traits in an annual weed, New. Phytol. 184 (2009) 806-818. [25] M.M. Vila-Aiub, P. Neve, S.B. Powles, Fitness costs associated with evolved herbici<strong>de</strong> resistance alleles in plants, New Phytol 184 (2009) 751-767. [26] A. Husken, A. Dietz-Pfeilstetter, Pollen-mediated intraspecific gene flow from herbici<strong>de</strong> resistant oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.), Transgenic. Res. 16 (2007) 57–569. 76
- Page 1 and 2:
UNIVERSITE DE BOURGOGNE THÈSE Pour
- Page 3 and 4:
REMERCIEMENTS My heartfelt thanks g
- Page 5 and 6:
forming many of the ideas I present
- Page 7 and 8:
Abstract In the framework of commer
- Page 9 and 10:
2.3 A rticle 2: Les r étrocroiseme
- Page 11 and 12:
Table 3.2. Parameters of linear reg
- Page 13 and 14:
experiment. BC1NS is separated into
- Page 15 and 16:
Fig. 4.7. Mean and standard error (
- Page 17 and 18:
INTRODUCTION GENERALE Dans le cadre
- Page 19 and 20:
chapitre 1 dressant l’état des c
- Page 21 and 22:
CHAPTER 1 LITERATURE REVIEW ON THE
- Page 23 and 24:
oilseed rape and B. oleracea is ver
- Page 25 and 26:
populations is reduced as the dista
- Page 27 and 28:
into hybrids would affect the morph
- Page 29 and 30: Snow e t a l. ( 1999) f ound no f i
- Page 31 and 32: 1.5 Consequences of introgression I
- Page 33 and 34: more flowers and larger plant size
- Page 35 and 36: Moreover, beside the introgression
- Page 37 and 38: their parental plants. Moon et al.
- Page 39 and 40: 2.1 Introduction CHAPTER 2 CONDITIO
- Page 41 and 42: ARTICLE 1 The effect of seed size o
- Page 43 and 44: plant growth was evaluated without
- Page 45 and 46: These two experiments were kept wee
- Page 47 and 48: interactions were found among the t
- Page 49 and 50: 2006) or m ore f it t han their pa
- Page 51 and 52: they b ear b eneficial t ransgenes
- Page 53 and 54: Diggle PK, Abrahamson NJ, Baker RL
- Page 55 and 56: Ramachandran S , B untin G D, A ll
- Page 57 and 58: Table 2.2. F -values f rom a f ive-
- Page 59 and 60: Days to flowering Biomass Per. of s
- Page 61 and 62: 2.3 Article 2: Les rétrocroisement
- Page 63 and 64: Photo.2.3. S praying chlorsulfuron
- Page 65 and 66: Introduction In t he f ramework o f
- Page 67 and 68: eceived p ollens f rom wild B. j un
- Page 69 and 70: Statistical analysis Mean values ar
- Page 71 and 72: Characteristics of the backcrosses
- Page 73 and 74: Table 2.7. Mean (±95% CL) of plant
- Page 75 and 76: plants w ith B. napus morphology t
- Page 77 and 78: Productivity of the resistant proge
- Page 79: References [1] A .A. Snow, D .A. A
- Page 83 and 84: CHAPTER 3 EFFETS DE LA RESISTANCE A
- Page 85 and 86: 3.2 A rticle 3 : S imulation d e l
- Page 87 and 88: compétition et le devenir des popu
- Page 89 and 90: difficult to predict. Similarly, it
- Page 91 and 92: Table 3.1: ANOVA results of the eff
- Page 93 and 94: Table 3.2: Parameters of linear reg
- Page 95 and 96: herbivores than when exposed to Bt
- Page 97 and 98: esistant hybrid populations might i
- Page 99 and 100: Letourneau D .K., H agen J .A., 200
- Page 101 and 102: Germination rate 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.
- Page 103 and 104: 3.3 Article 4: Compétition entre p
- Page 105 and 106: Introduction The invasion of transg
- Page 107 and 108: Whether a popul ation w ill e volve
- Page 109 and 110: while ensuring that the same ratio
- Page 111 and 112: silique number, seed number, seed w
- Page 113 and 114: Our ga rden e xperiments s howed t
- Page 115 and 116: experiment, harsh growth conditions
- Page 117 and 118: References Agrawal AA. 2004. R esis
- Page 119 and 120: density- dependent c osts of vi ral
- Page 121 and 122: Table 3.5. F values of the analysis
- Page 123 and 124: Table 3.7. Results of Helmert contr
- Page 125 and 126: Fig. 3.4. Examples of experimental
- Page 127 and 128: Flowering date Seed weight Biomass
- Page 129 and 130: No. viable seeds Biomass 50000 4000
- Page 131 and 132:
Photo 3.3. Cotton bollworm (Helicov
- Page 133 and 134:
Introduction Spontaneous introgress
- Page 135 and 136:
screening as transgenic BC2 (trBC2)
- Page 137 and 138:
2002), but certain studies showed n
- Page 139 and 140:
Acknowledgements We t hank Z hixi T
- Page 141 and 142:
92, 368-374. Rieseberg, LH, and Bur
- Page 143 and 144:
Table 3.10. F-values of three-way A
- Page 145 and 146:
Seed number Biomass 140 120 100 80
- Page 147 and 148:
CHAPTER 4 RECHERCHE DES CONSEQUENCE
- Page 149 and 150:
Photo 4.1. Wild radish in a herbici
- Page 151 and 152:
Introduction Plant divergence is ge
- Page 153 and 154:
or t he popul ation of wild r adish
- Page 155 and 156:
estimated. All the seeds of every h
- Page 157 and 158:
Field experiment Number of siliques
- Page 159 and 160:
aphanistrum from hybrids and R. sat
- Page 161 and 162:
competition diminished the differen
- Page 163 and 164:
Conner, J. K., Rice A. M., Stewart
- Page 165 and 166:
Rattenbury J A. 1962. C yclic h ybr
- Page 167 and 168:
Fig. 4.1. Four r egions where w ild
- Page 169 and 170:
Fig. 4.3. Flower phot os showing pe
- Page 171 and 172:
Fig. 4.5. Plot of the first two axe
- Page 173 and 174:
Plant weight No. of seeds per plant
- Page 175 and 176:
Emergence rate Plant weight No.of a
- Page 177 and 178:
CONCLUSION 172
- Page 179 and 180:
véritable s uccès ad aptatif d an
- Page 181 and 182:
Dans l e cas d es p remières gén
- Page 183 and 184:
REFERENCES Abbott RJ, Comes HP.2007
- Page 185 and 186:
Bing D J, D owney R K and R akow G
- Page 187 and 188:
carinata and Brassica rapa. Plant B
- Page 189 and 190:
Hybridisation within Brassica and a
- Page 191 and 192:
etween weedy Brassica rapa and oils
- Page 193 and 194:
Hybridization between oilseed rape
- Page 195 and 196:
Nosil P. 2008. Speciation with gene
- Page 197 and 198:
32:305-32 Schadler, M., R. Brandl,
- Page 199 and 200:
Thalmann C, Guadagnuolo R, Felber F
- Page 201 and 202:
Zheng XM and Ge S. 2010. Ecological
- Page 203 and 204:
Therefore, after a review of the st
- Page 205 and 206:
more easily sieved out by harvester
- Page 207 and 208:
Transgenic F1 produced higher bioma