14.08.2013 Views

UNIVERSITE DE BOURGOGNE THÈSE Yongbo LIU - Université de ...

UNIVERSITE DE BOURGOGNE THÈSE Yongbo LIU - Université de ...

UNIVERSITE DE BOURGOGNE THÈSE Yongbo LIU - Université de ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Productivity of the resistant progeny<br />

In our s tudy, w e e valuated pr oductivity, m easured as bi omass and s eed s et p arameters,<br />

without c ompetition be tween co -cultivated ge notypes, w hich c ould correspond t o t he<br />

conditions at the field bor<strong>de</strong>r (i.e. the cultivated bor<strong>de</strong>r line that is not sown). In most studies<br />

of t ransgene es cape b etween B. napus and B. r apa, BC 1 and F 2 exhibited l ower s eed<br />

production t han their pa rents [ 6, 9] . In our s tudy, BC1 and F 2 <strong>de</strong>monstrated s ignificantly<br />

higher ve getative pe rformance t han B. napus , which c ould pr ovi<strong>de</strong> op portunity f or qui ck<br />

establishment at the expense of volunteer and cropped oilseed rape. In contrast, BC1 and F 2<br />

produced less seeds than B. napus, and they had lower seed production efficiency per biomass<br />

unit t han B. napus , ( Fig 2.5), w hich c ould i mpact t heir r eproductive s uccess be cause m ore<br />

resources were nee<strong>de</strong>d to produce seeds. The difference of seed production between BC1 and<br />

F2 was bor<strong>de</strong>ring significance, because of the effect of the high variance found in BC1, which<br />

probably <strong>de</strong>noted an effective difference. Especially, the productivity of BC1 per biomass unit<br />

was cl early h igher t han t hat o f F 2 (Fig. 2.5). T herefore, it is lik ely th at B C1 are ab le t o<br />

establish in waste areas, field bor<strong>de</strong>rs, and even arable fields, more easily and rapidly than F2<br />

plants. The low variability noted for B. napus in the regression function between seed number<br />

and biomass was of environmental nature only because the cv. Drakkar is a pure line, which<br />

suggests that the higher variability recor<strong>de</strong>d in BC1 and F2 could be genetically <strong>de</strong>termined. A<br />

similar case of higher variability of performances was also observed in B. napus and B. rapa<br />

hybrid pr ogeny [ 8], w hich c ould be t he s ource of f urther genetic a daptation a nd l ead t o<br />

successful volunteers o r new w eeds in both non -crop and crop habitats. Such a situation is<br />

highly favorable t o t he r apid e volution of a daptive t raits t o t he a groecosystem [24]. I n<br />

addition, half of the BC1 exhibit the herbici<strong>de</strong>-resistance, which could help plants to survive<br />

in arable fields and roadsi<strong>de</strong>s if the corresponding herbici<strong>de</strong> were employed.<br />

No d ifference was o bserved b etween r esistant an d s usceptible BC1 plants (BC1NR versus<br />

BC1NS + BC 1NS*) and between resistant and susceptible F 2 plants, which suggests that no<br />

<strong>de</strong>trimental effect existed for expressing the herbici<strong>de</strong>-resistance gene. Preliminary data of the<br />

comparison of t he m utant l ine us ed he re w ith i ts or iginal c ultivar s howed th at d elayed<br />

flowering w as r esponsible f or 6 -14 % l ower yield [ 18]. In t wo ot her c ases onl y t he f itness<br />

differential due to ALS-endowed resistance was studied with appropriate plant materials and<br />

72

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!