14.08.2013 Views

UNIVERSITE DE BOURGOGNE THÈSE Yongbo LIU - Université de ...

UNIVERSITE DE BOURGOGNE THÈSE Yongbo LIU - Université de ...

UNIVERSITE DE BOURGOGNE THÈSE Yongbo LIU - Université de ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

large-see<strong>de</strong>d plants did, and there was no di fference for thousand-seed weight (Fig. 2.2). At<br />

low d ensity, s mall-see<strong>de</strong>d pl ants of GT pr oduced l ower bi omass a nd thousand-seed weight<br />

than l arge-see<strong>de</strong>d pl ants, but f lowering t ime and s eed num ber w as not di fferent. The<br />

percentage of large, medium and small seeds produced was not different among the three seed<br />

categories for all four plant types at both high and low <strong>de</strong>nsity.<br />

Fitness c omparison of f our pl ant t ypes All f itness c omponents, e xcept of t he<br />

emergence rate, were significantly different in the four plant types: trF1, ntrF1, mustard and<br />

GT (Tables 2.2, 2.3). Wild mustard flowered the earliest, trF1 and GT the latest, and ntrF1 was<br />

intermediate. T ransgenic F 1 and nt rF1 produced hi gher bi omass, l ower s eed num ber a nd<br />

weight a nd reproductive a llocation t han m ustard a nd G T, w ith l owest bi omass a nd hi ghest<br />

seed number and allocation in mustard and highest seed weight in GT (Table 2.3). Thousandseed<br />

weight of trF1 and ntrF1 was higher than that of mustard but lower than that of GT. The<br />

percentage o f l arge s eeds, m edium s eeds a nd s mall s eeds pr oduced b y t he f our pl ant t ypes<br />

was significantly different, and trF1 and ntrF1 produced 77% and 72% large seeds, 54% for<br />

GT and 1% for wild mustard (Table 2.3).<br />

At small seed size level, the seed number and seed weight of small-see<strong>de</strong>d plants of trF1<br />

were not significantly different compared with their parents, mustard and GT, in high <strong>de</strong>nsity<br />

population, and they were lower than their parents at low <strong>de</strong>nsity level.<br />

Discussion<br />

Growth and reproduction of various plant types<br />

Fitness o f h ybrids b etween t ransgenic cr ops an d w ild r elatives i nfluences t he eco logical<br />

consequences of transgene flow from GM crops to their wild relatives (Ellstrand et al. 1999;<br />

Pilson & Pren<strong>de</strong>ville 2004; V acher et a l. 2004). S everal f itness components of t wo<br />

interspecific hybrids (trF1 and ntrF1) and the parent plants--transgenic oilseed rape (GT) and B.<br />

juncea (mustard), ar e d escribed at al l g rowth stages f rom s eedling e mergence t o s eed<br />

production i n t he c urrent s tudy. T he h ybrids s howed h igher v egetative f itness b ut lo wer<br />

reproductive fitness than their parents, which is consistent with the results of Di et al. (2009).<br />

There are some cases in which wild-crop hybrids may be as fit (Lefol et al. 1995; Arriola &<br />

Ellstrand 1997) , l ess f it (Hauser et a l. 1998; G ueritaine et a l. 2002; A llainguillaume et a l.<br />

43

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!