UNIVERSITE DE BOURGOGNE THÈSE Yongbo LIU - Université de ...
UNIVERSITE DE BOURGOGNE THÈSE Yongbo LIU - Université de ...
UNIVERSITE DE BOURGOGNE THÈSE Yongbo LIU - Université de ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
interactions were found among the three factors, plant <strong>de</strong>nsity, seed category and plant type,<br />
for all measured fitness components (Table 2.2).<br />
Effect of plant <strong>de</strong>nsity on performances of plants from different seed categories For<br />
trF1, increased <strong>de</strong>nsity only <strong>de</strong>layed flowering of medium-see<strong>de</strong>d plants (F1,41=5.7, P=0.022)<br />
and increased thousand seeds weight of small-see<strong>de</strong>d plants (F1,35=6.1, P=0.018) (F ig. 2.2).<br />
Flowering d ate ( F1,39=5.9, P =0.02 f or l arge-see<strong>de</strong>d p lants; F 1,38=5.2, P =0.028 f or m edium;<br />
F1,34=10.5, P =0.002 f or s mall) a nd bi omass ( F1,40=15.01, P =0.003 f or l arge-see<strong>de</strong>d p lants;<br />
F1,38=4.3, P =0.045 f or medium; F 1,37=7.2, P =0.01 f or s mall) i n nt rF1 were s ignificantly<br />
affected by plant <strong>de</strong>nsity for all three seed categories. Seed number of small-see<strong>de</strong>d plants in<br />
ntrF1 at low <strong>de</strong>nsity was higher than at high <strong>de</strong>nsity (F1,37=7.9, P=0.007), but there were no<br />
differences between plant <strong>de</strong>nsities for large- and medium-see<strong>de</strong>d plants in ntrF1. Thousandseed<br />
weight was not affected for all seed categories in ntrF1 (Fig. 2.2).<br />
Large-, m edium- and s mall-see<strong>de</strong>d pl ants of m ustard pr oduced hi gher biomass a nd,<br />
more s eeds (P0.05, Fig. 2.2).<br />
Days t o f lowering, bi omass, s eed num ber and t housand-seed num ber of l arge- and<br />
medium-see<strong>de</strong>d pl ants of G T w as not a ffected by pl ant <strong>de</strong> nsity ( P>0.05). Increased pl ant<br />
<strong>de</strong>nsity <strong>de</strong>layed flowering time (F1,36=25.1, P=0.000), <strong>de</strong>creased biomass (F1,36=6.7, P=0.014)<br />
and seed number (F1,36=15.9, P=0.000) for small-see<strong>de</strong>d plants of GT (Fig. 2.2).<br />
Performances o f d ifferent s eed ca tegories Small-see<strong>de</strong>d pl ants of t rF1 revealed no<br />
difference in fitness components compared to medium- and large-see<strong>de</strong>d plants in both high<br />
and l ow <strong>de</strong> nsity popul ations ( Fig. 2.2). T he t hree s eed c ategories of ntrF1 pr oduced no<br />
different s eed num ber a nd bi omass a t bot h hi gh a nd l ow <strong>de</strong> nsity l evels, but s mall-see<strong>de</strong>d<br />
plants <strong>de</strong>layed flowering at high <strong>de</strong>nsity and produced lower thousand-seed weight than largesee<strong>de</strong>d<br />
pl ants a t l ow d ensity ( Fig. 2.2). S mall-see<strong>de</strong>d pl ants of wild m ustard pr oduced no<br />
different biomass, seed number and thousand-seed weight compared with the other two seed<br />
categories, and they flowered later at both high and low <strong>de</strong>nsity (Fig. 2.2).<br />
The three seed categories of GT performed differently at the two <strong>de</strong>nsities (Fig. 2.2). At<br />
high <strong>de</strong>nsity, small-see<strong>de</strong>d plants flowering later and produced less biomass and seeds than<br />
42