UNIVERSITE DE BOURGOGNE THÈSE Yongbo LIU - Université de ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

REFERENCES 177
REFERENCES Abbott RJ, Comes HP.2007. Blowin’ in the wind—the transition from ecotypeto species. New Phytologist, 175, 197-200. Agrawal AA, Conner JK, Johnson MTJ, and Wallsgrove R. 2002. E cological genetics of an induced p lant d efense against h erbivores: A dditive g enetic v ariance and co sts o f phenotypic plasticity. Evolution, 56: 2206–2213 Agrawal AA. 1998. Induced responses to herbivory and increased plant performance. Science, 279:1201–1202. Agrawal A A. 199 9. Induced r esponses t o he rbivory i n w ild r adish: effects on s everal herbivores and plant fitness. Ecology, 80: 1713–1723 Agrawal AA. 2004. Resistance and susceptibility of milkweed: Competition, root herbivory, and plant genetic variation. Ecology 85: 2118-2133. Ahmed SU, Zuberi MI. 1973. Effects of seed size on yield and some of its components in rape seed, Brassica campestris L. var. Toria. Crop Science, 13: 119–120. Akinerden F. 1991. Determination of the ploidy level of pure and mixed plant populations of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) by flow cytometry. Plant Breeding, 107: 333-337. AL Mouemar A, and Darmency H. 2004. Lack of stable inheritance of introgressed transgene from oilseed rape in wild radish. Environ. Biosafety Res., 3:209–214. Allainguillaume J , Alexander M, Bullock J M, Saunders M, Allender CJ, King G, Ford CS, Wilkinson MJ . 2006. F itness of hybrids between rapeseed (Brassica napus) and wild Brassica rapa in natural habitats. Molecular Ecology, 15: 1175–1184. Allendorf F W, a nd Lundquist LL. 2003. Population bi ology, e volution, a nd c ontrol of invasive species. Conservation Biology, 17:24-30. Ammitzbøll H and Jørgensen RB. 2006. Hybridization between oilseed rape (Brassica napus) and different populations and species of Raphanus. Environ. Biosafety Res. 5: 3-13 Ammitzboll H , M ikkelsen T N, J orgensen R B. 2005. T ransgene expression a nd f itness of hybrids between GM oilseed rape and Brassica rapa. Environ. Biosafety Res. 4: 3–12 Anderson, E. 1949. Introgressive hybridization. John Wiley and Sons, N.Y. Andersson MS and de Vicente MC. 2010. G ene flow between crops and their wild relatives. (Press: The Johns Hopkins University press) Aono M , Wakiyama S , Nagatsu M , N akajima N, Tamaoki M , K ubo A a nd S aji H. 2006. Detection o f feral transgenic o ilseed r ape with mu ltiple-herbicide r esistance i n J apan. 178
Page 1 and 2:
UNIVERSITE DE BOURGOGNE THÈSE Pour
Page 3 and 4:
REMERCIEMENTS My heartfelt thanks g
Page 5 and 6:
forming many of the ideas I present
Page 7 and 8:
Abstract In the framework of commer
Page 9 and 10:
2.3 A rticle 2: Les r étrocroiseme
Page 11 and 12:
Table 3.2. Parameters of linear reg
Page 13 and 14:
experiment. BC1NS is separated into
Page 15 and 16:
Fig. 4.7. Mean and standard error (
Page 17 and 18:
INTRODUCTION GENERALE Dans le cadre
Page 19 and 20:
chapitre 1 dressant l’état des c
Page 21 and 22:
CHAPTER 1 LITERATURE REVIEW ON THE
Page 23 and 24:
oilseed rape and B. oleracea is ver
Page 25 and 26:
populations is reduced as the dista
Page 27 and 28:
into hybrids would affect the morph
Page 29 and 30:
Snow e t a l. ( 1999) f ound no f i
Page 31 and 32:
1.5 Consequences of introgression I
Page 33 and 34:
more flowers and larger plant size
Page 35 and 36:
Moreover, beside the introgression
Page 37 and 38:
their parental plants. Moon et al.
Page 39 and 40:
2.1 Introduction CHAPTER 2 CONDITIO
Page 41 and 42:
ARTICLE 1 The effect of seed size o
Page 43 and 44:
plant growth was evaluated without
Page 45 and 46:
These two experiments were kept wee
Page 47 and 48:
interactions were found among the t
Page 49 and 50:
2006) or m ore f it t han their pa
Page 51 and 52:
they b ear b eneficial t ransgenes
Page 53 and 54:
Diggle PK, Abrahamson NJ, Baker RL
Page 55 and 56:
Ramachandran S , B untin G D, A ll
Page 57 and 58:
Table 2.2. F -values f rom a f ive-
Page 59 and 60:
Days to flowering Biomass Per. of s
Page 61 and 62:
2.3 Article 2: Les rétrocroisement
Page 63 and 64:
Photo.2.3. S praying chlorsulfuron
Page 65 and 66:
Introduction In t he f ramework o f
Page 67 and 68:
eceived p ollens f rom wild B. j un
Page 69 and 70:
Statistical analysis Mean values ar
Page 71 and 72:
Characteristics of the backcrosses
Page 73 and 74:
Table 2.7. Mean (±95% CL) of plant
Page 75 and 76:
plants w ith B. napus morphology t
Page 77 and 78:
Productivity of the resistant proge
Page 79 and 80:
References [1] A .A. Snow, D .A. A
Page 81 and 82:
insight into adaptive life-history
Page 83 and 84:
CHAPTER 3 EFFETS DE LA RESISTANCE A
Page 85 and 86:
3.2 A rticle 3 : S imulation d e l
Page 87 and 88:
compétition et le devenir des popu
Page 89 and 90:
difficult to predict. Similarly, it
Page 91 and 92:
Table 3.1: ANOVA results of the eff
Page 93 and 94:
Table 3.2: Parameters of linear reg
Page 95 and 96:
herbivores than when exposed to Bt
Page 97 and 98:
esistant hybrid populations might i
Page 99 and 100:
Letourneau D .K., H agen J .A., 200
Page 101 and 102:
Germination rate 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.
Page 103 and 104:
3.3 Article 4: Compétition entre p
Page 105 and 106:
Introduction The invasion of transg
Page 107 and 108:
Whether a popul ation w ill e volve
Page 109 and 110:
while ensuring that the same ratio
Page 111 and 112:
silique number, seed number, seed w
Page 113 and 114:
Our ga rden e xperiments s howed t
Page 115 and 116:
experiment, harsh growth conditions
Page 117 and 118:
References Agrawal AA. 2004. R esis
Page 119 and 120:
density- dependent c osts of vi ral
Page 121 and 122:
Table 3.5. F values of the analysis
Page 123 and 124:
Table 3.7. Results of Helmert contr
Page 125 and 126:
Fig. 3.4. Examples of experimental
Page 127 and 128:
Flowering date Seed weight Biomass
Page 129 and 130:
No. viable seeds Biomass 50000 4000
Page 131 and 132: Photo 3.3. Cotton bollworm (Helicov
Page 133 and 134: Introduction Spontaneous introgress
Page 135 and 136: screening as transgenic BC2 (trBC2)
Page 137 and 138: 2002), but certain studies showed n
Page 139 and 140: Acknowledgements We t hank Z hixi T
Page 141 and 142: 92, 368-374. Rieseberg, LH, and Bur
Page 143 and 144: Table 3.10. F-values of three-way A
Page 145 and 146: Seed number Biomass 140 120 100 80
Page 147 and 148: CHAPTER 4 RECHERCHE DES CONSEQUENCE
Page 149 and 150: Photo 4.1. Wild radish in a herbici
Page 151 and 152: Introduction Plant divergence is ge
Page 153 and 154: or t he popul ation of wild r adish
Page 155 and 156: estimated. All the seeds of every h
Page 157 and 158: Field experiment Number of siliques
Page 159 and 160: aphanistrum from hybrids and R. sat
Page 161 and 162: competition diminished the differen
Page 163 and 164: Conner, J. K., Rice A. M., Stewart
Page 165 and 166: Rattenbury J A. 1962. C yclic h ybr
Page 167 and 168: Fig. 4.1. Four r egions where w ild
Page 169 and 170: Fig. 4.3. Flower phot os showing pe
Page 171 and 172: Fig. 4.5. Plot of the first two axe
Page 173 and 174: Plant weight No. of seeds per plant
Page 175 and 176: Emergence rate Plant weight No.of a
Page 177 and 178: CONCLUSION 172
Page 179 and 180: véritable s uccès ad aptatif d an
Page 181: Dans l e cas d es p remières gén
Page 185 and 186: Bing D J, D owney R K and R akow G
Page 187 and 188: carinata and Brassica rapa. Plant B
Page 189 and 190: Hybridisation within Brassica and a
Page 191 and 192: etween weedy Brassica rapa and oils
Page 193 and 194: Hybridization between oilseed rape
Page 195 and 196: Nosil P. 2008. Speciation with gene
Page 197 and 198: 32:305-32 Schadler, M., R. Brandl,
Page 199 and 200: Thalmann C, Guadagnuolo R, Felber F
Page 201 and 202: Zheng XM and Ge S. 2010. Ecological
Page 203 and 204: Therefore, after a review of the st
Page 205 and 206: more easily sieved out by harvester
Page 207 and 208: Transgenic F1 produced higher bioma
show all

UNIVERSITE DE BOURGOGNE THÈSE Yongbo LIU - Université de ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?