- Page 1 and 2:
UNIVERSITE DE BOURGOGNE THÈSE Pour
- Page 3 and 4:
REMERCIEMENTS My heartfelt thanks g
- Page 5 and 6:
forming many of the ideas I present
- Page 7 and 8:
Abstract In the framework of commer
- Page 9 and 10:
2.3 A rticle 2: Les r étrocroiseme
- Page 11 and 12:
Table 3.2. Parameters of linear reg
- Page 13 and 14:
experiment. BC1NS is separated into
- Page 15 and 16:
Fig. 4.7. Mean and standard error (
- Page 17 and 18:
INTRODUCTION GENERALE Dans le cadre
- Page 19 and 20:
chapitre 1 dressant l’état des c
- Page 21 and 22:
CHAPTER 1 LITERATURE REVIEW ON THE
- Page 23 and 24:
oilseed rape and B. oleracea is ver
- Page 25 and 26:
populations is reduced as the dista
- Page 27 and 28:
into hybrids would affect the morph
- Page 29 and 30:
Snow e t a l. ( 1999) f ound no f i
- Page 31 and 32:
1.5 Consequences of introgression I
- Page 33 and 34:
more flowers and larger plant size
- Page 35 and 36:
Moreover, beside the introgression
- Page 37 and 38:
their parental plants. Moon et al.
- Page 39 and 40:
2.1 Introduction CHAPTER 2 CONDITIO
- Page 41 and 42:
ARTICLE 1 The effect of seed size o
- Page 43 and 44:
plant growth was evaluated without
- Page 45 and 46:
These two experiments were kept wee
- Page 47 and 48:
interactions were found among the t
- Page 49 and 50:
2006) or m ore f it t han their pa
- Page 51 and 52:
they b ear b eneficial t ransgenes
- Page 53 and 54:
Diggle PK, Abrahamson NJ, Baker RL
- Page 55 and 56:
Ramachandran S , B untin G D, A ll
- Page 57 and 58:
Table 2.2. F -values f rom a f ive-
- Page 59 and 60:
Days to flowering Biomass Per. of s
- Page 61 and 62:
2.3 Article 2: Les rétrocroisement
- Page 63 and 64:
Photo.2.3. S praying chlorsulfuron
- Page 65 and 66:
Introduction In t he f ramework o f
- Page 67 and 68:
eceived p ollens f rom wild B. j un
- Page 69 and 70:
Statistical analysis Mean values ar
- Page 71 and 72:
Characteristics of the backcrosses
- Page 73 and 74:
Table 2.7. Mean (±95% CL) of plant
- Page 75 and 76:
plants w ith B. napus morphology t
- Page 77 and 78:
Productivity of the resistant proge
- Page 79 and 80:
References [1] A .A. Snow, D .A. A
- Page 81 and 82:
insight into adaptive life-history
- Page 83 and 84:
CHAPTER 3 EFFETS DE LA RESISTANCE A
- Page 85 and 86:
3.2 A rticle 3 : S imulation d e l
- Page 87 and 88:
compétition et le devenir des popu
- Page 89 and 90:
difficult to predict. Similarly, it
- Page 91 and 92:
Table 3.1: ANOVA results of the eff
- Page 93 and 94:
Table 3.2: Parameters of linear reg
- Page 95 and 96:
herbivores than when exposed to Bt
- Page 97 and 98:
esistant hybrid populations might i
- Page 99 and 100:
Letourneau D .K., H agen J .A., 200
- Page 101 and 102:
Germination rate 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.
- Page 103 and 104:
3.3 Article 4: Compétition entre p
- Page 105 and 106:
Introduction The invasion of transg
- Page 107 and 108:
Whether a popul ation w ill e volve
- Page 109 and 110:
while ensuring that the same ratio
- Page 111 and 112:
silique number, seed number, seed w
- Page 113 and 114:
Our ga rden e xperiments s howed t
- Page 115 and 116: experiment, harsh growth conditions
- Page 117 and 118: References Agrawal AA. 2004. R esis
- Page 119 and 120: density- dependent c osts of vi ral
- Page 121 and 122: Table 3.5. F values of the analysis
- Page 123 and 124: Table 3.7. Results of Helmert contr
- Page 125 and 126: Fig. 3.4. Examples of experimental
- Page 127 and 128: Flowering date Seed weight Biomass
- Page 129 and 130: No. viable seeds Biomass 50000 4000
- Page 131 and 132: Photo 3.3. Cotton bollworm (Helicov
- Page 133 and 134: Introduction Spontaneous introgress
- Page 135 and 136: screening as transgenic BC2 (trBC2)
- Page 137 and 138: 2002), but certain studies showed n
- Page 139 and 140: Acknowledgements We t hank Z hixi T
- Page 141 and 142: 92, 368-374. Rieseberg, LH, and Bur
- Page 143 and 144: Table 3.10. F-values of three-way A
- Page 145 and 146: Seed number Biomass 140 120 100 80
- Page 147 and 148: CHAPTER 4 RECHERCHE DES CONSEQUENCE
- Page 149 and 150: Photo 4.1. Wild radish in a herbici
- Page 151 and 152: Introduction Plant divergence is ge
- Page 153 and 154: or t he popul ation of wild r adish
- Page 155 and 156: estimated. All the seeds of every h
- Page 157 and 158: Field experiment Number of siliques
- Page 159 and 160: aphanistrum from hybrids and R. sat
- Page 161 and 162: competition diminished the differen
- Page 163 and 164: Conner, J. K., Rice A. M., Stewart
- Page 165: Rattenbury J A. 1962. C yclic h ybr
- Page 169 and 170: Fig. 4.3. Flower phot os showing pe
- Page 171 and 172: Fig. 4.5. Plot of the first two axe
- Page 173 and 174: Plant weight No. of seeds per plant
- Page 175 and 176: Emergence rate Plant weight No.of a
- Page 177 and 178: CONCLUSION 172
- Page 179 and 180: véritable s uccès ad aptatif d an
- Page 181 and 182: Dans l e cas d es p remières gén
- Page 183 and 184: REFERENCES Abbott RJ, Comes HP.2007
- Page 185 and 186: Bing D J, D owney R K and R akow G
- Page 187 and 188: carinata and Brassica rapa. Plant B
- Page 189 and 190: Hybridisation within Brassica and a
- Page 191 and 192: etween weedy Brassica rapa and oils
- Page 193 and 194: Hybridization between oilseed rape
- Page 195 and 196: Nosil P. 2008. Speciation with gene
- Page 197 and 198: 32:305-32 Schadler, M., R. Brandl,
- Page 199 and 200: Thalmann C, Guadagnuolo R, Felber F
- Page 201 and 202: Zheng XM and Ge S. 2010. Ecological
- Page 203 and 204: Therefore, after a review of the st
- Page 205 and 206: more easily sieved out by harvester
- Page 207 and 208: Transgenic F1 produced higher bioma