UNIVERSITE DE BOURGOGNE THÈSE Yongbo LIU - Université de ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Holm, L., J. Doll, E. Holm, J. Pancho and J. Herberger,1997 World Weeds. Natural Histories and Distribution. Wiley, New York. Kercher S and Conner JK. 1996. Patterns of genetic variability within and among populations of wild radish, Raphanus raphanistrum (Brassicaceae). American Journal of Botany, 83, 1416-1421 Klinger T, Arriola PE, and Ellstrand NC. 1992. Crop-weed hybridization in radish (Raphanus sativus L.): e ffects of di stance and popul ation s ize. A merican J ournal of B otany, 79: 1431–1435. Lee T N, S now A A. 1998. P ollinator pr eferences a nd t he pe rsistence of crop ge nes i n w ild radish populations (Raphanus raphanistrum, Brassicaceae). American Journal of Botany 85: 333–349. Lenormand T. 2002. Gene flow and the limits to natural Selection. TRENDS in Ecology & Evolution.17, 183-189 Lexer, C ., W elch, M .E., R aymond, O . & R ieseberg, L.H. 2003 . The o rigin o f e cological divergence in Helianthus paradoxus (Asteraceae): selection on transgressive characters in a novel hybrid habitat. Evolution, 57, 1989–2000. Linder C R, T aha I, S eiler G J, S now A A, R ieseberg LH. 1998. Long-term introgression of crop genes into wild sunflower populations. Theoretical and Applied Genetics. 96: 339– 347. Morjan CL, Rieseberg LH. 2004. How species evolve collectively, implications of gene flow and selection for the spread of advantageous alleles. Molecular Ecology, 13, 1341-1356. Nosil P. 2008. Speciation with gene flow could be common. Molecular Ecology, 17, 2103 – 2106. Panetsos CA, and B aker HG. 1967. T he or igin of va riation i n wild Raphanus s ativus (Cruciferae) in California. Genetica 38: 243–274. Pilson D and Prendeville HR. 2004. E cological effects of transgenic crops and the escape of transgenes into wild populations. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 2004. 35:149–74 Postma E & va n N oordwijk A J. 2005. Gene f low m aintains a l arge genetic d ifference i n clutch size at a small spatial scale. Nature, 433, 65-68 Ramachandran S ., Buntin G .D., A ll J .N., R aymer P .L., S tewart C .N. 2000. I ntraspecific competition of a n i nsect-resistant t ransgenic c anola i n s eed m ixtures. A gron. J ., 92, 368–374. 159
Rattenbury J A. 1962. C yclic h ybridization a s a survival m echanism i n New Z ealand f orest flora. Evolution 16: 348–363. Rieseberg LH, Archer MA, and Wayne RK. 1999. Transgressive segregation, adaptation and speciation. Heredity, 83:363–372. Ross-Ibarra J, Tenaillon M, Gaut BS (2009) Historical divergence and gene flow in the genus Zea. Genetics, 181, 1399–1413. Sahli H F., C onner J K., S haw F H., H owe S a nd Lale A . 2008. A daptive D ifferentiation of Quantitative T raits in th e G lobally D istributed Weed, W ild R adish ( Raphanus raphanistrum). Genetics 180: 945–955 Snow A A, U thus K L, C ulley T M. 2001. F itness of h ybrids be tween weedy and cu ltivated radish: implications for weed evolution. Ecological Applications 11: 934–943. Snow AA, Culley TM, Campbell LG , Sweeney PM, Hegde SG, Ellstrand NC. 2010. L ong- term p ersistence o f cr op al leles i n w eedy populations of w ild r adish ( Raphanus raphanistrum). New Phytologist, 186: 537–548 Suh SH, Sato YI, Morishima H, 1997. Genetic characterization of weedy rice (Oryza sativa L.) based on m orph-physiology, i sozymes a nd R APD m arkers. T heoretical a nd A pplied Genetics, 94: 316-321. Thalmann C, Guadagnuolo R, Felber F. 2001. Search for spontaneous hybridization between oilseed r ape (Brassica napus L.) and w ild r adish ( Raphanus r aphanistrum L.) i n agricultural z ones and evaluation of t he ge netic di versity of t he w ild s pecies. B ot Helvetica 111:107-119 Tiedje JM, Colwell R K, Grossman Y L, Hodson R E, Lenski R E, Mack R N, a nd Regal P J. 1989. The pl anned i ntroduction of g enetically e ngineered or ganisms- ecological considerations and recommendations. Ecology, 70: 298-315 Tokunaga T, and Ohnishi O. 1992. Spatial autocrrelation analysis of allozyme variants within local sites of wild radish population. Jpn. J. Genet. 67: 209-216 Tutin TG, Burges NA, Chater AO, Edmondson JR, Heywood VH, Moore DM, Valentine DH, Walters SM, Webb DA. 1993. F lora Europaea. Volume 1: Psilotaceae to platanaceae. Second edition. Cambridge University Press. Page: 417 Vacher C., Weiss A.E., Hermann D., Kossler T., Young C., Hochberg M.E. 2004. Impact of ecological f actors o n th e in itial in vasion o f B t tr ansgenes in to w ild p opulations o f birdseed rape (Brassica rapa). Theor. Appl. Genet., 109, 806–814. Warwick S I, S imard M J, Légère A , B eckie HJ, Braun L, Zhu B et a l. 2003. Hybridization 160
Page 1 and 2:
UNIVERSITE DE BOURGOGNE THÈSE Pour
Page 3 and 4:
REMERCIEMENTS My heartfelt thanks g
Page 5 and 6:
forming many of the ideas I present
Page 7 and 8:
Abstract In the framework of commer
Page 9 and 10:
2.3 A rticle 2: Les r étrocroiseme
Page 11 and 12:
Table 3.2. Parameters of linear reg
Page 13 and 14:
experiment. BC1NS is separated into
Page 15 and 16:
Fig. 4.7. Mean and standard error (
Page 17 and 18:
INTRODUCTION GENERALE Dans le cadre
Page 19 and 20:
chapitre 1 dressant l’état des c
Page 21 and 22:
CHAPTER 1 LITERATURE REVIEW ON THE
Page 23 and 24:
oilseed rape and B. oleracea is ver
Page 25 and 26:
populations is reduced as the dista
Page 27 and 28:
into hybrids would affect the morph
Page 29 and 30:
Snow e t a l. ( 1999) f ound no f i
Page 31 and 32:
1.5 Consequences of introgression I
Page 33 and 34:
more flowers and larger plant size
Page 35 and 36:
Moreover, beside the introgression
Page 37 and 38:
their parental plants. Moon et al.
Page 39 and 40:
2.1 Introduction CHAPTER 2 CONDITIO
Page 41 and 42:
ARTICLE 1 The effect of seed size o
Page 43 and 44:
plant growth was evaluated without
Page 45 and 46:
These two experiments were kept wee
Page 47 and 48:
interactions were found among the t
Page 49 and 50:
2006) or m ore f it t han their pa
Page 51 and 52:
they b ear b eneficial t ransgenes
Page 53 and 54:
Diggle PK, Abrahamson NJ, Baker RL
Page 55 and 56:
Ramachandran S , B untin G D, A ll
Page 57 and 58:
Table 2.2. F -values f rom a f ive-
Page 59 and 60:
Days to flowering Biomass Per. of s
Page 61 and 62:
2.3 Article 2: Les rétrocroisement
Page 63 and 64:
Photo.2.3. S praying chlorsulfuron
Page 65 and 66:
Introduction In t he f ramework o f
Page 67 and 68:
eceived p ollens f rom wild B. j un
Page 69 and 70:
Statistical analysis Mean values ar
Page 71 and 72:
Characteristics of the backcrosses
Page 73 and 74:
Table 2.7. Mean (±95% CL) of plant
Page 75 and 76:
plants w ith B. napus morphology t
Page 77 and 78:
Productivity of the resistant proge
Page 79 and 80:
References [1] A .A. Snow, D .A. A
Page 81 and 82:
insight into adaptive life-history
Page 83 and 84:
CHAPTER 3 EFFETS DE LA RESISTANCE A
Page 85 and 86:
3.2 A rticle 3 : S imulation d e l
Page 87 and 88:
compétition et le devenir des popu
Page 89 and 90:
difficult to predict. Similarly, it
Page 91 and 92:
Table 3.1: ANOVA results of the eff
Page 93 and 94:
Table 3.2: Parameters of linear reg
Page 95 and 96:
herbivores than when exposed to Bt
Page 97 and 98:
esistant hybrid populations might i
Page 99 and 100:
Letourneau D .K., H agen J .A., 200
Page 101 and 102:
Germination rate 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.
Page 103 and 104:
3.3 Article 4: Compétition entre p
Page 105 and 106:
Introduction The invasion of transg
Page 107 and 108:
Whether a popul ation w ill e volve
Page 109 and 110:
while ensuring that the same ratio
Page 111 and 112:
silique number, seed number, seed w
Page 113 and 114: Our ga rden e xperiments s howed t
Page 115 and 116: experiment, harsh growth conditions
Page 117 and 118: References Agrawal AA. 2004. R esis
Page 119 and 120: density- dependent c osts of vi ral
Page 121 and 122: Table 3.5. F values of the analysis
Page 123 and 124: Table 3.7. Results of Helmert contr
Page 125 and 126: Fig. 3.4. Examples of experimental
Page 127 and 128: Flowering date Seed weight Biomass
Page 129 and 130: No. viable seeds Biomass 50000 4000
Page 131 and 132: Photo 3.3. Cotton bollworm (Helicov
Page 133 and 134: Introduction Spontaneous introgress
Page 135 and 136: screening as transgenic BC2 (trBC2)
Page 137 and 138: 2002), but certain studies showed n
Page 139 and 140: Acknowledgements We t hank Z hixi T
Page 141 and 142: 92, 368-374. Rieseberg, LH, and Bur
Page 143 and 144: Table 3.10. F-values of three-way A
Page 145 and 146: Seed number Biomass 140 120 100 80
Page 147 and 148: CHAPTER 4 RECHERCHE DES CONSEQUENCE
Page 149 and 150: Photo 4.1. Wild radish in a herbici
Page 151 and 152: Introduction Plant divergence is ge
Page 153 and 154: or t he popul ation of wild r adish
Page 155 and 156: estimated. All the seeds of every h
Page 157 and 158: Field experiment Number of siliques
Page 159 and 160: aphanistrum from hybrids and R. sat
Page 161 and 162: competition diminished the differen
Page 163: Conner, J. K., Rice A. M., Stewart
Page 167 and 168: Fig. 4.1. Four r egions where w ild
Page 169 and 170: Fig. 4.3. Flower phot os showing pe
Page 171 and 172: Fig. 4.5. Plot of the first two axe
Page 173 and 174: Plant weight No. of seeds per plant
Page 175 and 176: Emergence rate Plant weight No.of a
Page 177 and 178: CONCLUSION 172
Page 179 and 180: véritable s uccès ad aptatif d an
Page 181 and 182: Dans l e cas d es p remières gén
Page 183 and 184: REFERENCES Abbott RJ, Comes HP.2007
Page 185 and 186: Bing D J, D owney R K and R akow G
Page 187 and 188: carinata and Brassica rapa. Plant B
Page 189 and 190: Hybridisation within Brassica and a
Page 191 and 192: etween weedy Brassica rapa and oils
Page 193 and 194: Hybridization between oilseed rape
Page 195 and 196: Nosil P. 2008. Speciation with gene
Page 197 and 198: 32:305-32 Schadler, M., R. Brandl,
Page 199 and 200: Thalmann C, Guadagnuolo R, Felber F
Page 201 and 202: Zheng XM and Ge S. 2010. Ecological
Page 203 and 204: Therefore, after a review of the st
Page 205 and 206: more easily sieved out by harvester
Page 207 and 208: Transgenic F1 produced higher bioma
show all

UNIVERSITE DE BOURGOGNE THÈSE Yongbo LIU - Université de ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?