UNIVERSITE DE BOURGOGNE THÈSE Yongbo LIU - Université de ...
UNIVERSITE DE BOURGOGNE THÈSE Yongbo LIU - Université de ...
UNIVERSITE DE BOURGOGNE THÈSE Yongbo LIU - Université de ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
silique number, seed number, seed weight, biomass, number of viable seeds (all P < 0.001),<br />
and seed number per silique (P < 0.05) than NC plants. The clipping effect was less evi<strong>de</strong>nt in<br />
the s econd ex periment; i n t his cas e C P p lants h ad f ewer s iliques, l ighter s eed w eights, a nd<br />
lower biomass than NC plants (Figure 3.5, Table 3.5). Clipping had no effect on flowering<br />
date, number of viable seeds, or the resource allocation in<strong>de</strong>x in either year (Table 3.5).<br />
Effect of the percentage of simulated insect-resistant plants<br />
In the 2008 experiment, an increased percentage of NC plants resulted in reduced seed<br />
weight, biomass, and number of viable seeds in both plant types (P < 0.01 for all variables),<br />
though t he pr esence a nd m agnitu<strong>de</strong> o f t his e ffect varied w ith pl ot pos ition. T here was no<br />
effect o n f lowering t ime o r t he r esource al location i n<strong>de</strong>x. T here w as al so a s ignificant<br />
interaction between leaf clipping, the percentage of NC plants, and plot position (Table 3.5),<br />
suggesting that NC and CP plants reacted differently to different combinations of conditions.<br />
In t he p lot cen tre, an i ncreased p ercentage o f N C p lants resulted i n d ecreased s eed w eight,<br />
biomass, and number of viable seeds of both plant types. However, at the plot bor<strong>de</strong>r, these<br />
variables only <strong>de</strong>creased for NC plants (Figure 3.6, Table 3.6). Each of these variables was<br />
plotted against the percentage of NC plants separately for each plant type at the bor<strong>de</strong>r, and<br />
again f or t hose a t t he c enter of t he pl ots ( Figure 3 .6). T he r egression s lopes di d not di ffer<br />
between NC and CP plants situated at the center of the plot. The slopes for NC plants situated<br />
at the bor<strong>de</strong>r did not differ from those situated at the centre. In all cases, the low values of the<br />
regression coefficient R 2 indicated a poor fit and a great <strong>de</strong>al of variability among plots (Table<br />
3.6).<br />
In the 2009 e xperiment, there was no l ink between the percentage of NC plants and<br />
any of the measured characteristics, and no interaction among treatments. There was only one<br />
significant lin ear r egression; f lowering d ate o f th e N C p lants s ituated a t th e p lot c enter<br />
increased with the percentage of NC plants (Figure 3.6).<br />
In the 2008 e xperiment, the relationship between the variables and percentage of NC<br />
plants was non-linear for CP plants at the plot bor<strong>de</strong>r ( Figure 3.6). The resource allocation<br />
in<strong>de</strong>x was lowest at T 50 for all NC and CP plants at both plot positions (Figure 3.6). In the<br />
2009 experiment, the relationship between the variables and percentage of NC plants was also<br />
non-linear for both NC and CP plants at the plot center. In this experiment, extreme values of<br />
NC plants were observed at T75 in the plot bor<strong>de</strong>r and the resource allocation in<strong>de</strong>x of NC and<br />
106